Religious law versus secular law<br> The example of the <i>get</i> refusal in Dutch, English and Israeli law

The tension between religious law and secular law in modern democracies is illustrated in this article by a discussion of the different approaches to the get (a bill of divorce) refusal (based on Jewish law) under Dutch, English and Israeli law. These legal orders share many characteristics, but als...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Matthijs de Blois
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University School of Law 2010-06-01
Series:Utrecht Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.126/
id doaj-81500ceeeb1b4ab5a06d7cbf56c07191
record_format Article
spelling doaj-81500ceeeb1b4ab5a06d7cbf56c071912020-11-25T03:48:51ZengUtrecht University School of LawUtrecht Law Review1871-515X2010-06-01629311410.18352/ulr.126126Religious law versus secular law<br> The example of the <i>get</i> refusal in Dutch, English and Israeli lawMatthijs de BloisThe tension between religious law and secular law in modern democracies is illustrated in this article by a discussion of the different approaches to the get (a bill of divorce) refusal (based on Jewish law) under Dutch, English and Israeli law. These legal orders share many characteristics, but also display important differences as to the role of religion and religious law in the public realm. The Dutch system is the most secular of the three; it does not recognize a role for religious law within the secular system as such. The English legislation provides for means that to a certain extent facilitate the effectuation of a religious divorce. In Israel, finally, the law of marriage and divorce is as such governed by the religious law of the parties concerned; for the majority of the population that is Jewish law. An evaluation of the different approaches in the framework of human rights law reveals the complexities of the collision of the underlying values in terms of equality, religious freedom and minority rights, also having regard to the diversity of opinions within religious communities.http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.126/religious lawsecular lawJewish lawcomparative lawDutch lawEnglish lawIsraeli lawdivorceget refusalequalityfreedom of religioncollision of human rights
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthijs de Blois
spellingShingle Matthijs de Blois
Religious law versus secular law<br> The example of the <i>get</i> refusal in Dutch, English and Israeli law
Utrecht Law Review
religious law
secular law
Jewish law
comparative law
Dutch law
English law
Israeli law
divorce
get refusal
equality
freedom of religion
collision of human rights
author_facet Matthijs de Blois
author_sort Matthijs de Blois
title Religious law versus secular law<br> The example of the <i>get</i> refusal in Dutch, English and Israeli law
title_short Religious law versus secular law<br> The example of the <i>get</i> refusal in Dutch, English and Israeli law
title_full Religious law versus secular law<br> The example of the <i>get</i> refusal in Dutch, English and Israeli law
title_fullStr Religious law versus secular law<br> The example of the <i>get</i> refusal in Dutch, English and Israeli law
title_full_unstemmed Religious law versus secular law<br> The example of the <i>get</i> refusal in Dutch, English and Israeli law
title_sort religious law versus secular law<br> the example of the <i>get</i> refusal in dutch, english and israeli law
publisher Utrecht University School of Law
series Utrecht Law Review
issn 1871-515X
publishDate 2010-06-01
description The tension between religious law and secular law in modern democracies is illustrated in this article by a discussion of the different approaches to the get (a bill of divorce) refusal (based on Jewish law) under Dutch, English and Israeli law. These legal orders share many characteristics, but also display important differences as to the role of religion and religious law in the public realm. The Dutch system is the most secular of the three; it does not recognize a role for religious law within the secular system as such. The English legislation provides for means that to a certain extent facilitate the effectuation of a religious divorce. In Israel, finally, the law of marriage and divorce is as such governed by the religious law of the parties concerned; for the majority of the population that is Jewish law. An evaluation of the different approaches in the framework of human rights law reveals the complexities of the collision of the underlying values in terms of equality, religious freedom and minority rights, also having regard to the diversity of opinions within religious communities.
topic religious law
secular law
Jewish law
comparative law
Dutch law
English law
Israeli law
divorce
get refusal
equality
freedom of religion
collision of human rights
url http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.126/
work_keys_str_mv AT matthijsdeblois religiouslawversussecularlawltbrgttheexampleoftheltigtgetltigtrefusalindutchenglishandisraelilaw
_version_ 1724496774899433472