Governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectives
Abstract Background The development of public health policy is inextricably linked with governance structure. In our increasingly globalized world, human migration and infectious diseases often span multiple administrative jurisdictions that might have different systems of government and divergent m...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-10-01
|
Series: | BMC Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11797-3 |
id |
doaj-814f69ca682246299814e414c21034ee |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-814f69ca682246299814e414c21034ee2021-10-03T11:18:24ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582021-10-0121111310.1186/s12889-021-11797-3Governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectivesJulie C. Blackwood0Mykhaylo M. Malakhov1Junyan Duan2Jordan J. Pellett3Ishan S. Phadke4Suzanne Lenhart5Charles Sims6Katriona Shea7Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Williams CollegeDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of MinnesotaCenter for Complex Biological Systems, University of California IrvineDepartment of Mathematics, University of TennesseeDepartment of Economics, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillDepartment of Mathematics, University of TennesseeDepartment of Economics, University of TennesseeDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University ParkAbstract Background The development of public health policy is inextricably linked with governance structure. In our increasingly globalized world, human migration and infectious diseases often span multiple administrative jurisdictions that might have different systems of government and divergent management objectives. However, few studies have considered how the allocation of regulatory authority among jurisdictions can affect disease management outcomes. Methods Here we evaluate the relative merits of decentralized and centralized management by developing and numerically analyzing a two-jurisdiction SIRS model that explicitly incorporates migration. In our model, managers choose between vaccination, isolation, medication, border closure, and a travel ban on infected individuals while aiming to minimize either the number of cases or the number of deaths. Results We consider a variety of scenarios and show how optimal strategies differ for decentralized and centralized management levels. We demonstrate that policies formed in the best interest of individual jurisdictions may not achieve global objectives, and identify situations where locally applied interventions can lead to an overall increase in the numbers of cases and deaths. Conclusions Our approach underscores the importance of tailoring disease management plans to existing regulatory structures as part of an evidence-based decision framework. Most importantly, we demonstrate that there needs to be a greater consideration of the degree to which governance structure impacts disease outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11797-3GovernanceInfectious diseaseManagementMathematical modelMigrationObjectives |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Julie C. Blackwood Mykhaylo M. Malakhov Junyan Duan Jordan J. Pellett Ishan S. Phadke Suzanne Lenhart Charles Sims Katriona Shea |
spellingShingle |
Julie C. Blackwood Mykhaylo M. Malakhov Junyan Duan Jordan J. Pellett Ishan S. Phadke Suzanne Lenhart Charles Sims Katriona Shea Governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectives BMC Public Health Governance Infectious disease Management Mathematical model Migration Objectives |
author_facet |
Julie C. Blackwood Mykhaylo M. Malakhov Junyan Duan Jordan J. Pellett Ishan S. Phadke Suzanne Lenhart Charles Sims Katriona Shea |
author_sort |
Julie C. Blackwood |
title |
Governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectives |
title_short |
Governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectives |
title_full |
Governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectives |
title_fullStr |
Governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectives |
title_full_unstemmed |
Governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectives |
title_sort |
governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectives |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Public Health |
issn |
1471-2458 |
publishDate |
2021-10-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The development of public health policy is inextricably linked with governance structure. In our increasingly globalized world, human migration and infectious diseases often span multiple administrative jurisdictions that might have different systems of government and divergent management objectives. However, few studies have considered how the allocation of regulatory authority among jurisdictions can affect disease management outcomes. Methods Here we evaluate the relative merits of decentralized and centralized management by developing and numerically analyzing a two-jurisdiction SIRS model that explicitly incorporates migration. In our model, managers choose between vaccination, isolation, medication, border closure, and a travel ban on infected individuals while aiming to minimize either the number of cases or the number of deaths. Results We consider a variety of scenarios and show how optimal strategies differ for decentralized and centralized management levels. We demonstrate that policies formed in the best interest of individual jurisdictions may not achieve global objectives, and identify situations where locally applied interventions can lead to an overall increase in the numbers of cases and deaths. Conclusions Our approach underscores the importance of tailoring disease management plans to existing regulatory structures as part of an evidence-based decision framework. Most importantly, we demonstrate that there needs to be a greater consideration of the degree to which governance structure impacts disease outcomes. |
topic |
Governance Infectious disease Management Mathematical model Migration Objectives |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11797-3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT juliecblackwood governancestructureaffectstransboundarydiseasemanagementunderalternativeobjectives AT mykhaylommalakhov governancestructureaffectstransboundarydiseasemanagementunderalternativeobjectives AT junyanduan governancestructureaffectstransboundarydiseasemanagementunderalternativeobjectives AT jordanjpellett governancestructureaffectstransboundarydiseasemanagementunderalternativeobjectives AT ishansphadke governancestructureaffectstransboundarydiseasemanagementunderalternativeobjectives AT suzannelenhart governancestructureaffectstransboundarydiseasemanagementunderalternativeobjectives AT charlessims governancestructureaffectstransboundarydiseasemanagementunderalternativeobjectives AT katrionashea governancestructureaffectstransboundarydiseasemanagementunderalternativeobjectives |
_version_ |
1716845508122640384 |