Governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectives

Abstract Background The development of public health policy is inextricably linked with governance structure. In our increasingly globalized world, human migration and infectious diseases often span multiple administrative jurisdictions that might have different systems of government and divergent m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julie C. Blackwood, Mykhaylo M. Malakhov, Junyan Duan, Jordan J. Pellett, Ishan S. Phadke, Suzanne Lenhart, Charles Sims, Katriona Shea
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-10-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11797-3
id doaj-814f69ca682246299814e414c21034ee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-814f69ca682246299814e414c21034ee2021-10-03T11:18:24ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582021-10-0121111310.1186/s12889-021-11797-3Governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectivesJulie C. Blackwood0Mykhaylo M. Malakhov1Junyan Duan2Jordan J. Pellett3Ishan S. Phadke4Suzanne Lenhart5Charles Sims6Katriona Shea7Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Williams CollegeDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of MinnesotaCenter for Complex Biological Systems, University of California IrvineDepartment of Mathematics, University of TennesseeDepartment of Economics, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillDepartment of Mathematics, University of TennesseeDepartment of Economics, University of TennesseeDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University ParkAbstract Background The development of public health policy is inextricably linked with governance structure. In our increasingly globalized world, human migration and infectious diseases often span multiple administrative jurisdictions that might have different systems of government and divergent management objectives. However, few studies have considered how the allocation of regulatory authority among jurisdictions can affect disease management outcomes. Methods Here we evaluate the relative merits of decentralized and centralized management by developing and numerically analyzing a two-jurisdiction SIRS model that explicitly incorporates migration. In our model, managers choose between vaccination, isolation, medication, border closure, and a travel ban on infected individuals while aiming to minimize either the number of cases or the number of deaths. Results We consider a variety of scenarios and show how optimal strategies differ for decentralized and centralized management levels. We demonstrate that policies formed in the best interest of individual jurisdictions may not achieve global objectives, and identify situations where locally applied interventions can lead to an overall increase in the numbers of cases and deaths. Conclusions Our approach underscores the importance of tailoring disease management plans to existing regulatory structures as part of an evidence-based decision framework. Most importantly, we demonstrate that there needs to be a greater consideration of the degree to which governance structure impacts disease outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11797-3GovernanceInfectious diseaseManagementMathematical modelMigrationObjectives
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julie C. Blackwood
Mykhaylo M. Malakhov
Junyan Duan
Jordan J. Pellett
Ishan S. Phadke
Suzanne Lenhart
Charles Sims
Katriona Shea
spellingShingle Julie C. Blackwood
Mykhaylo M. Malakhov
Junyan Duan
Jordan J. Pellett
Ishan S. Phadke
Suzanne Lenhart
Charles Sims
Katriona Shea
Governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectives
BMC Public Health
Governance
Infectious disease
Management
Mathematical model
Migration
Objectives
author_facet Julie C. Blackwood
Mykhaylo M. Malakhov
Junyan Duan
Jordan J. Pellett
Ishan S. Phadke
Suzanne Lenhart
Charles Sims
Katriona Shea
author_sort Julie C. Blackwood
title Governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectives
title_short Governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectives
title_full Governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectives
title_fullStr Governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectives
title_full_unstemmed Governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectives
title_sort governance structure affects transboundary disease management under alternative objectives
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2021-10-01
description Abstract Background The development of public health policy is inextricably linked with governance structure. In our increasingly globalized world, human migration and infectious diseases often span multiple administrative jurisdictions that might have different systems of government and divergent management objectives. However, few studies have considered how the allocation of regulatory authority among jurisdictions can affect disease management outcomes. Methods Here we evaluate the relative merits of decentralized and centralized management by developing and numerically analyzing a two-jurisdiction SIRS model that explicitly incorporates migration. In our model, managers choose between vaccination, isolation, medication, border closure, and a travel ban on infected individuals while aiming to minimize either the number of cases or the number of deaths. Results We consider a variety of scenarios and show how optimal strategies differ for decentralized and centralized management levels. We demonstrate that policies formed in the best interest of individual jurisdictions may not achieve global objectives, and identify situations where locally applied interventions can lead to an overall increase in the numbers of cases and deaths. Conclusions Our approach underscores the importance of tailoring disease management plans to existing regulatory structures as part of an evidence-based decision framework. Most importantly, we demonstrate that there needs to be a greater consideration of the degree to which governance structure impacts disease outcomes.
topic Governance
Infectious disease
Management
Mathematical model
Migration
Objectives
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11797-3
work_keys_str_mv AT juliecblackwood governancestructureaffectstransboundarydiseasemanagementunderalternativeobjectives
AT mykhaylommalakhov governancestructureaffectstransboundarydiseasemanagementunderalternativeobjectives
AT junyanduan governancestructureaffectstransboundarydiseasemanagementunderalternativeobjectives
AT jordanjpellett governancestructureaffectstransboundarydiseasemanagementunderalternativeobjectives
AT ishansphadke governancestructureaffectstransboundarydiseasemanagementunderalternativeobjectives
AT suzannelenhart governancestructureaffectstransboundarydiseasemanagementunderalternativeobjectives
AT charlessims governancestructureaffectstransboundarydiseasemanagementunderalternativeobjectives
AT katrionashea governancestructureaffectstransboundarydiseasemanagementunderalternativeobjectives
_version_ 1716845508122640384