Quantifying location error to define uncertainty in volcanic mass flow hazard simulations
<p>The use of mass flow simulations in volcanic hazard zonation and mapping is often limited by model complexity (i.e. uncertainty in correct values of model parameters), a lack of model uncertainty quantification, and limited approaches to incorporate this uncertainty into hazard maps. When q...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences |
Online Access: | https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/21/2447/2021/nhess-21-2447-2021.pdf |
id |
doaj-8148bce6872a44d88f234728562fcdcf |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8148bce6872a44d88f234728562fcdcf2021-08-20T05:36:12ZengCopernicus PublicationsNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences1561-86331684-99812021-08-01212447246010.5194/nhess-21-2447-2021Quantifying location error to define uncertainty in volcanic mass flow hazard simulationsS. R. MeadJ. ProcterG. Kereszturi<p>The use of mass flow simulations in volcanic hazard zonation and mapping is often limited by model complexity (i.e. uncertainty in correct values of model parameters), a lack of model uncertainty quantification, and limited approaches to incorporate this uncertainty into hazard maps. When quantified, mass flow simulation errors are typically evaluated on a pixel-pair basis, using the difference between simulated and observed (“actual”) map-cell values to evaluate the performance of a model. However, these comparisons conflate location and quantification errors, neglecting possible spatial autocorrelation of evaluated errors. As a result, model performance assessments typically yield moderate accuracy values. In this paper, similarly moderate accuracy values were found in a performance assessment of three depth-averaged numerical models using the 2012 debris avalanche from the Upper Te Maari crater, Tongariro Volcano, as a benchmark. To provide a fairer assessment of performance and evaluate spatial covariance of errors, we use a fuzzy set approach to indicate the proximity of similarly valued map cells. This “fuzzification” of simulated results yields improvements in targeted performance metrics relative to a length scale parameter at the expense of decreases in opposing metrics (e.g. fewer false negatives result in more false positives) and a reduction in resolution. The use of this approach to generate hazard zones incorporating the identified uncertainty and associated trade-offs is demonstrated and indicates a potential use for informed stakeholders by reducing the complexity of uncertainty estimation and supporting decision-making from simulated data.</p>https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/21/2447/2021/nhess-21-2447-2021.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
S. R. Mead J. Procter G. Kereszturi |
spellingShingle |
S. R. Mead J. Procter G. Kereszturi Quantifying location error to define uncertainty in volcanic mass flow hazard simulations Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences |
author_facet |
S. R. Mead J. Procter G. Kereszturi |
author_sort |
S. R. Mead |
title |
Quantifying location error to define uncertainty in volcanic mass flow hazard simulations |
title_short |
Quantifying location error to define uncertainty in volcanic mass flow hazard simulations |
title_full |
Quantifying location error to define uncertainty in volcanic mass flow hazard simulations |
title_fullStr |
Quantifying location error to define uncertainty in volcanic mass flow hazard simulations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quantifying location error to define uncertainty in volcanic mass flow hazard simulations |
title_sort |
quantifying location error to define uncertainty in volcanic mass flow hazard simulations |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences |
issn |
1561-8633 1684-9981 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
<p>The use of mass flow simulations in volcanic hazard zonation and mapping is often limited by model complexity (i.e. uncertainty in correct values of model parameters), a lack of model uncertainty quantification, and limited approaches to incorporate this uncertainty into hazard maps. When quantified, mass flow simulation errors are typically evaluated on a pixel-pair basis, using the difference between simulated and observed (“actual”) map-cell values to evaluate the performance of a model.
However, these comparisons conflate location and quantification errors,
neglecting possible spatial autocorrelation of evaluated errors. As a
result, model performance assessments typically yield moderate accuracy
values. In this paper, similarly moderate accuracy values were found in a
performance assessment of three depth-averaged numerical models using the
2012 debris avalanche from the Upper Te Maari crater, Tongariro Volcano, as a benchmark. To provide a fairer assessment of performance and evaluate
spatial covariance of errors, we use a fuzzy set approach to indicate the
proximity of similarly valued map cells. This “fuzzification” of simulated results yields improvements in targeted performance metrics relative to a length scale parameter at the expense of decreases in opposing metrics (e.g. fewer false negatives result in more false positives) and a reduction in resolution. The use of this approach to generate hazard zones incorporating the identified uncertainty and associated trade-offs is demonstrated and indicates a potential use for informed stakeholders by reducing the complexity of uncertainty estimation and supporting decision-making from simulated data.</p> |
url |
https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/21/2447/2021/nhess-21-2447-2021.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT srmead quantifyinglocationerrortodefineuncertaintyinvolcanicmassflowhazardsimulations AT jprocter quantifyinglocationerrortodefineuncertaintyinvolcanicmassflowhazardsimulations AT gkereszturi quantifyinglocationerrortodefineuncertaintyinvolcanicmassflowhazardsimulations |
_version_ |
1721201539314352128 |