PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI
Constitutional Court (MK) through Verdict Number 138/PUU-VII/2009 have, conclusion that authoritative MK to check, to judging, and breaking application of examination of Regulation of Government of Substitution of Code. Though article 24 C sentence (1) Constitution of Indonesia State 194...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
2014-06-01
|
Series: | Jurnal Media Hukum |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/1158 |
id |
doaj-8132a0e280034b3999de6a411a2513f5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8132a0e280034b3999de6a411a2513f52020-11-24T21:39:17ZengUniversitas Muhammadiyah YogyakartaJurnal Media Hukum0854-89192503-10232014-06-01211980PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSIDjoko Imbawani0Universitas Widyagama MalangConstitutional Court (MK) through Verdict Number 138/PUU-VII/2009 have, conclusion that authoritative MK to check, to judging, and breaking application of examination of Regulation of Government of Substitution of Code. Though article 24 C sentence (1) Constitution of Indonesia State 1945 (III amendment) for example authoritative test inviter code to constitution, to uphold supremacy of constitution. Assessment to regulation of government of substitution of code according to rule articles 22 sentence (2) Constitution of Indonesia State 1945 conducted by Parliament in next conference.This Research type is research of law of normative. Approach which utilized in this research is approach of law philosophy, approach of law theory, and constitutional approach. The system based on the Constitution’s attempt to RIS or UUDS, judicial it does not allow review of product in the form of legislative act because the product is a result of the exercise of sovereignty, let alone judicial review against a Perpu. Similarly a Perpu born based on the Constitution of 1945 (original text) also cannot be done yudicial review. After he did the amendment to the Constitution process yudicial review can be done. Yudicial review against a Perpu can be done, but the need for the restriction that a Perpu substance should set things outside the realm of the Executive branch can do yudicial review.<br /><br />http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/1158judicial reviewregulation of government of substitution codeconstitutional court |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Djoko Imbawani |
spellingShingle |
Djoko Imbawani PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Jurnal Media Hukum judicial review regulation of government of substitution code constitutional court |
author_facet |
Djoko Imbawani |
author_sort |
Djoko Imbawani |
title |
PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI |
title_short |
PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI |
title_full |
PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI |
title_fullStr |
PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI |
title_full_unstemmed |
PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI |
title_sort |
pengujian peraturan pemerintah pengganti undang-undang oleh mahkamah konstitusi |
publisher |
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta |
series |
Jurnal Media Hukum |
issn |
0854-8919 2503-1023 |
publishDate |
2014-06-01 |
description |
Constitutional Court (MK) through Verdict Number 138/PUU-VII/2009 have, conclusion that authoritative MK to check, to judging, and breaking application of examination of Regulation of Government of Substitution of Code. Though article 24 C sentence (1) Constitution of Indonesia State 1945 (III amendment) for example authoritative test inviter code to constitution, to uphold supremacy of constitution. Assessment to regulation of government of substitution of code according to rule articles 22 sentence (2) Constitution of Indonesia State 1945 conducted by Parliament in next conference.This Research type is research of law of normative. Approach which utilized in this research is approach of law philosophy, approach of law theory, and constitutional approach. The system based on the Constitution’s attempt to RIS or UUDS, judicial it does not allow review of product in the form of legislative act because the product is a result of the exercise of sovereignty, let alone judicial review against a Perpu. Similarly a Perpu born based on the Constitution of 1945 (original text) also cannot be done yudicial review. After he did the amendment to the Constitution process yudicial review can be done. Yudicial review against a Perpu can be done, but the need for the restriction that a Perpu substance should set things outside the realm of the Executive branch can do yudicial review.<br /><br /> |
topic |
judicial review regulation of government of substitution code constitutional court |
url |
http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/1158 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT djokoimbawani pengujianperaturanpemerintahpenggantiundangundangolehmahkamahkonstitusi |
_version_ |
1725931533070499840 |