PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI

Constitutional Court (MK) through Verdict Number 138/PUU-VII/2009 have, conclusion  that authoritative MK to check, to  judging, and breaking application of examination of Regulation of Government of Substitution of Code.  Though  article  24  C  sentence  (1)  Constitution of  Indonesia  State  194...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Djoko Imbawani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta 2014-06-01
Series:Jurnal Media Hukum
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/1158
id doaj-8132a0e280034b3999de6a411a2513f5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8132a0e280034b3999de6a411a2513f52020-11-24T21:39:17ZengUniversitas Muhammadiyah YogyakartaJurnal Media Hukum0854-89192503-10232014-06-01211980PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSIDjoko Imbawani0Universitas Widyagama MalangConstitutional Court (MK) through Verdict Number 138/PUU-VII/2009 have, conclusion  that authoritative MK to check, to  judging, and breaking application of examination of Regulation of Government of Substitution of Code.  Though  article  24  C  sentence  (1)  Constitution of  Indonesia  State  1945  (III  amendment)  for  example authoritative test  inviter code  to  constitution,  to uphold supremacy of constitution. Assessment  to  regulation of  government of  substitution  of  code  according  to  rule  articles  22  sentence  (2) Constitution of  Indonesia State  1945  conducted  by  Parliament  in  next  conference.This  Research  type  is  research  of  law  of  normative. Approach which utilized in this research is approach of law philosophy, approach of law theory, and constitutional approach. The system based on the Constitution’s attempt to RIS or UUDS,  judicial it does not allow review of product  in the  form of  legislative act because  the product  is a  result of the exercise of  sovereignty,  let alone judicial  review  against  a Perpu.  Similarly a Perpu born based on  the Constitution  of 1945  (original  text) also cannot be done  yudicial  review. After he did  the  amendment to  the Constitution process yudicial review  can be done. Yudicial review against a Perpu can be done, but  the need for the restriction that a Perpu substance should  set  things outside  the  realm of  the  Executive branch  can do  yudicial review.<br /><br />http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/1158judicial reviewregulation of government of substitution codeconstitutional court
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Djoko Imbawani
spellingShingle Djoko Imbawani
PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI
Jurnal Media Hukum
judicial review
regulation of government of substitution code
constitutional court
author_facet Djoko Imbawani
author_sort Djoko Imbawani
title PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI
title_short PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI
title_full PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI
title_fullStr PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI
title_full_unstemmed PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI
title_sort pengujian peraturan pemerintah pengganti undang-undang oleh mahkamah konstitusi
publisher Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
series Jurnal Media Hukum
issn 0854-8919
2503-1023
publishDate 2014-06-01
description Constitutional Court (MK) through Verdict Number 138/PUU-VII/2009 have, conclusion  that authoritative MK to check, to  judging, and breaking application of examination of Regulation of Government of Substitution of Code.  Though  article  24  C  sentence  (1)  Constitution of  Indonesia  State  1945  (III  amendment)  for  example authoritative test  inviter code  to  constitution,  to uphold supremacy of constitution. Assessment  to  regulation of  government of  substitution  of  code  according  to  rule  articles  22  sentence  (2) Constitution of  Indonesia State  1945  conducted  by  Parliament  in  next  conference.This  Research  type  is  research  of  law  of  normative. Approach which utilized in this research is approach of law philosophy, approach of law theory, and constitutional approach. The system based on the Constitution’s attempt to RIS or UUDS,  judicial it does not allow review of product  in the  form of  legislative act because  the product  is a  result of the exercise of  sovereignty,  let alone judicial  review  against  a Perpu.  Similarly a Perpu born based on  the Constitution  of 1945  (original  text) also cannot be done  yudicial  review. After he did  the  amendment to  the Constitution process yudicial review  can be done. Yudicial review against a Perpu can be done, but  the need for the restriction that a Perpu substance should  set  things outside  the  realm of  the  Executive branch  can do  yudicial review.<br /><br />
topic judicial review
regulation of government of substitution code
constitutional court
url http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/1158
work_keys_str_mv AT djokoimbawani pengujianperaturanpemerintahpenggantiundangundangolehmahkamahkonstitusi
_version_ 1725931533070499840