Subjective Ontology and the Individual’s Lifeworld

The author proposes an interpretation of the core role of subjective ontology in the formation of the individual’s lifeworld. It is shown that the actual implementation of the life journey obliges the person to think ontologically, explaining to oneself, basing on the accumulated experience, how the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sapogova E.E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education 2019-03-01
Series:Культурно-историческая психология
Subjects:
Online Access:http://psyjournals.ru/en/kip/2019/n1/Sapogova.shtml
id doaj-810bd64f14f44bec97c1f0c2556d4f05
record_format Article
spelling doaj-810bd64f14f44bec97c1f0c2556d4f052020-11-25T02:37:10ZengMoscow State University of Psychology and EducationКультурно-историческая психология1816-54352224-89352019-03-01151354510.17759/chp.2019150104Subjective Ontology and the Individual’s LifeworldSapogova E.E.0Moscow State Pedagogical University, Moscow, RussiaThe author proposes an interpretation of the core role of subjective ontology in the formation of the individual’s lifeworld. It is shown that the actual implementation of the life journey obliges the person to think ontologically, explaining to oneself, basing on the accumulated experience, how the reality is arranged, and building a version of the causes and consequences of his own existence in it. Solving the tasks of self-development and constructing personal life stories, the individual relies upon some ultimate ontologemes (‘fate’, ‘fortuity’, ‘free will’), each of which generates different foci of interpretation of self-experience and defines the individual semantics of possible life events: if the ontology of free will dominates, then self-interpretation is built primarily as an explanation of human deeds; if the person believes in the predetermination of everything by fate, then life fulfillment would be in the focus of his/her consciousness; if everything is dominated by the fortuity, then life is perceived as a set of unpredictable incidents. The assimilated ultimate ontologemes stimulate the prevalence in self-interpretation of one of the mental processes (belief, thinking, intuition) and thus set three possible frames for the interpretation of the life path: fate — fulfillment — belief; fortuity — incident — intuition; free will — deed — thinking. The lifeworld is represented as a pyramid whose top is formed by subjective ontology that performs a system-forming function in relation to it, and its facets are its epistemological, axiological, praxeological and symbolic dimensions.http://psyjournals.ru/en/kip/2019/n1/Sapogova.shtmlsubjective ontologyontologeme
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sapogova E.E.
spellingShingle Sapogova E.E.
Subjective Ontology and the Individual’s Lifeworld
Культурно-историческая психология
subjective ontology
ontologeme
author_facet Sapogova E.E.
author_sort Sapogova E.E.
title Subjective Ontology and the Individual’s Lifeworld
title_short Subjective Ontology and the Individual’s Lifeworld
title_full Subjective Ontology and the Individual’s Lifeworld
title_fullStr Subjective Ontology and the Individual’s Lifeworld
title_full_unstemmed Subjective Ontology and the Individual’s Lifeworld
title_sort subjective ontology and the individual’s lifeworld
publisher Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
series Культурно-историческая психология
issn 1816-5435
2224-8935
publishDate 2019-03-01
description The author proposes an interpretation of the core role of subjective ontology in the formation of the individual’s lifeworld. It is shown that the actual implementation of the life journey obliges the person to think ontologically, explaining to oneself, basing on the accumulated experience, how the reality is arranged, and building a version of the causes and consequences of his own existence in it. Solving the tasks of self-development and constructing personal life stories, the individual relies upon some ultimate ontologemes (‘fate’, ‘fortuity’, ‘free will’), each of which generates different foci of interpretation of self-experience and defines the individual semantics of possible life events: if the ontology of free will dominates, then self-interpretation is built primarily as an explanation of human deeds; if the person believes in the predetermination of everything by fate, then life fulfillment would be in the focus of his/her consciousness; if everything is dominated by the fortuity, then life is perceived as a set of unpredictable incidents. The assimilated ultimate ontologemes stimulate the prevalence in self-interpretation of one of the mental processes (belief, thinking, intuition) and thus set three possible frames for the interpretation of the life path: fate — fulfillment — belief; fortuity — incident — intuition; free will — deed — thinking. The lifeworld is represented as a pyramid whose top is formed by subjective ontology that performs a system-forming function in relation to it, and its facets are its epistemological, axiological, praxeological and symbolic dimensions.
topic subjective ontology
ontologeme
url http://psyjournals.ru/en/kip/2019/n1/Sapogova.shtml
work_keys_str_mv AT sapogovaee subjectiveontologyandtheindividualslifeworld
_version_ 1724796276306870272