Effect of H2S and HCl on solid oxide fuel cells fed with simulated biosyngas containing primary tar

Abstract Integrated biomass gasifier solid oxide fuel cell systems are an alternative to fossil‐fuel‐based combined heat and power generators. However, biosyngas contaminants represent a bottleneck for small‐scale systems. In this work, we present the results of experiments on the effects of H2S, HC...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alessandro Cavalli, Roberta Bernardini, Tommaso Del Carlo, Purushothaman Vellayani Aravind
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-12-01
Series:Energy Science & Engineering
Subjects:
H2S
HCl
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.434
id doaj-81077fd08252434c9714e02a942f923a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-81077fd08252434c9714e02a942f923a2020-11-25T00:27:32ZengWileyEnergy Science & Engineering2050-05052019-12-01762456246810.1002/ese3.434Effect of H2S and HCl on solid oxide fuel cells fed with simulated biosyngas containing primary tarAlessandro Cavalli0Roberta Bernardini1Tommaso Del Carlo2Purushothaman Vellayani Aravind3Process & Energy Department, 3me Faculty Delft University of Technology Delft The NetherlandsDepartment of Energy, Systems, Territory and Construction Engineering, Faculty of Engineering University of Pisa Pisa ItalyDepartment of Energy, Systems, Territory and Construction Engineering, Faculty of Engineering University of Pisa Pisa ItalyProcess & Energy Department, 3me Faculty Delft University of Technology Delft The NetherlandsAbstract Integrated biomass gasifier solid oxide fuel cell systems are an alternative to fossil‐fuel‐based combined heat and power generators. However, biosyngas contaminants represent a bottleneck for small‐scale systems. In this work, we present the results of experiments on the effects of H2S, HCl, and acetic acid as model primary tar on Ni‐GDC SOFC. First, the effects of 17‐128 g/Nm3 dry basis acetic acid were studied. On a second cell, 0.8 and 1.3 ppm(v) H2S were added to the simulated biosyngas anode flow. After a full recovery, the cell was exposed to 42 g/Nm3 acetic acid and 0.8 ppm(v) H2S. On a third cell, 3.4, 20, and 50 ppm(v) HCl were tested and, after a recovery period, 42 g/Nm3 acetic acid and HCl were added. Even 0.8 ppm(v) H2S caused an immediate voltage drop. H2S affected CH4 reforming and water‐gas shift reaction. Differently, even 50 ppm(v) HCl appeared not to significantly affect these reactions. Acetic acid increased the cell voltage but caused carbon deposition at the cell inlet. The voltage increase seemed not to be affected by H2S or HCl, and no acetic acid was measured at the cell outlet, indicating that these contaminants do not affect the primary tar conversion.https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.434biomass gasifiercontaminants cross‐influencedirect internal tar reformingH2SHClSOFC
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alessandro Cavalli
Roberta Bernardini
Tommaso Del Carlo
Purushothaman Vellayani Aravind
spellingShingle Alessandro Cavalli
Roberta Bernardini
Tommaso Del Carlo
Purushothaman Vellayani Aravind
Effect of H2S and HCl on solid oxide fuel cells fed with simulated biosyngas containing primary tar
Energy Science & Engineering
biomass gasifier
contaminants cross‐influence
direct internal tar reforming
H2S
HCl
SOFC
author_facet Alessandro Cavalli
Roberta Bernardini
Tommaso Del Carlo
Purushothaman Vellayani Aravind
author_sort Alessandro Cavalli
title Effect of H2S and HCl on solid oxide fuel cells fed with simulated biosyngas containing primary tar
title_short Effect of H2S and HCl on solid oxide fuel cells fed with simulated biosyngas containing primary tar
title_full Effect of H2S and HCl on solid oxide fuel cells fed with simulated biosyngas containing primary tar
title_fullStr Effect of H2S and HCl on solid oxide fuel cells fed with simulated biosyngas containing primary tar
title_full_unstemmed Effect of H2S and HCl on solid oxide fuel cells fed with simulated biosyngas containing primary tar
title_sort effect of h2s and hcl on solid oxide fuel cells fed with simulated biosyngas containing primary tar
publisher Wiley
series Energy Science & Engineering
issn 2050-0505
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Abstract Integrated biomass gasifier solid oxide fuel cell systems are an alternative to fossil‐fuel‐based combined heat and power generators. However, biosyngas contaminants represent a bottleneck for small‐scale systems. In this work, we present the results of experiments on the effects of H2S, HCl, and acetic acid as model primary tar on Ni‐GDC SOFC. First, the effects of 17‐128 g/Nm3 dry basis acetic acid were studied. On a second cell, 0.8 and 1.3 ppm(v) H2S were added to the simulated biosyngas anode flow. After a full recovery, the cell was exposed to 42 g/Nm3 acetic acid and 0.8 ppm(v) H2S. On a third cell, 3.4, 20, and 50 ppm(v) HCl were tested and, after a recovery period, 42 g/Nm3 acetic acid and HCl were added. Even 0.8 ppm(v) H2S caused an immediate voltage drop. H2S affected CH4 reforming and water‐gas shift reaction. Differently, even 50 ppm(v) HCl appeared not to significantly affect these reactions. Acetic acid increased the cell voltage but caused carbon deposition at the cell inlet. The voltage increase seemed not to be affected by H2S or HCl, and no acetic acid was measured at the cell outlet, indicating that these contaminants do not affect the primary tar conversion.
topic biomass gasifier
contaminants cross‐influence
direct internal tar reforming
H2S
HCl
SOFC
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.434
work_keys_str_mv AT alessandrocavalli effectofh2sandhclonsolidoxidefuelcellsfedwithsimulatedbiosyngascontainingprimarytar
AT robertabernardini effectofh2sandhclonsolidoxidefuelcellsfedwithsimulatedbiosyngascontainingprimarytar
AT tommasodelcarlo effectofh2sandhclonsolidoxidefuelcellsfedwithsimulatedbiosyngascontainingprimarytar
AT purushothamanvellayaniaravind effectofh2sandhclonsolidoxidefuelcellsfedwithsimulatedbiosyngascontainingprimarytar
_version_ 1725339171366633472