Electronic Monitoring in Europe – a Panacea for Reforming Criminal Sanctions Systems? A Critical Review

[full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian] First experiments with electronic monitoring emerged in Europe in the early 1990s. Within 15 years, the majority of countries in Europe reported having introduced electronic monitoring at least as pilot projects. The amazing dynamic ris...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Frieder Dünkel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius University Press 2018-12-01
Series:Kriminologijos studijos
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journals.vu.lt/kriminologijos-studijos/article/view/12674
id doaj-8105f5a949824d36a38db03d8fd95ccc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8105f5a949824d36a38db03d8fd95ccc2020-11-25T02:46:37ZengVilnius University PressKriminologijos studijos2538-87542351-60972018-12-01610.15388/CrimLithuan.2018.6.3Electronic Monitoring in Europe – a Panacea for Reforming Criminal Sanctions Systems? A Critical ReviewFrieder Dünkel0Universität Greifswald [full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian] First experiments with electronic monitoring emerged in Europe in the early 1990s. Within 15 years, the majority of countries in Europe reported having introduced electronic monitoring at least as pilot projects. The amazing dynamic rise of electronic monitoring in Europe may be explained by the commercial interests that become evident when looking at the activities of private companies selling the technique. Although electronic monitoring seems to have expanded in many countries, one has to realize its marginal role within the European sanctions systems compared to other sentencing or release options. On average, only about 3% of all probationary supervised persons were under electronic monitoring at the end of 2013. This article deals with questions regarding the impact of electronic monitoring on prison population rates and reduced reoffending, with net-widening effects and costs, essential rehabilitative support, human rights-based perspectives and the general (non)sense of electronic monitoring. http://www.journals.vu.lt/kriminologijos-studijos/article/view/12674electronic monitoringpunishmentinternational standardshuman rightscriminal justice
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Frieder Dünkel
spellingShingle Frieder Dünkel
Electronic Monitoring in Europe – a Panacea for Reforming Criminal Sanctions Systems? A Critical Review
Kriminologijos studijos
electronic monitoring
punishment
international standards
human rights
criminal justice
author_facet Frieder Dünkel
author_sort Frieder Dünkel
title Electronic Monitoring in Europe – a Panacea for Reforming Criminal Sanctions Systems? A Critical Review
title_short Electronic Monitoring in Europe – a Panacea for Reforming Criminal Sanctions Systems? A Critical Review
title_full Electronic Monitoring in Europe – a Panacea for Reforming Criminal Sanctions Systems? A Critical Review
title_fullStr Electronic Monitoring in Europe – a Panacea for Reforming Criminal Sanctions Systems? A Critical Review
title_full_unstemmed Electronic Monitoring in Europe – a Panacea for Reforming Criminal Sanctions Systems? A Critical Review
title_sort electronic monitoring in europe – a panacea for reforming criminal sanctions systems? a critical review
publisher Vilnius University Press
series Kriminologijos studijos
issn 2538-8754
2351-6097
publishDate 2018-12-01
description [full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian] First experiments with electronic monitoring emerged in Europe in the early 1990s. Within 15 years, the majority of countries in Europe reported having introduced electronic monitoring at least as pilot projects. The amazing dynamic rise of electronic monitoring in Europe may be explained by the commercial interests that become evident when looking at the activities of private companies selling the technique. Although electronic monitoring seems to have expanded in many countries, one has to realize its marginal role within the European sanctions systems compared to other sentencing or release options. On average, only about 3% of all probationary supervised persons were under electronic monitoring at the end of 2013. This article deals with questions regarding the impact of electronic monitoring on prison population rates and reduced reoffending, with net-widening effects and costs, essential rehabilitative support, human rights-based perspectives and the general (non)sense of electronic monitoring.
topic electronic monitoring
punishment
international standards
human rights
criminal justice
url http://www.journals.vu.lt/kriminologijos-studijos/article/view/12674
work_keys_str_mv AT friederdunkel electronicmonitoringineuropeapanaceaforreformingcriminalsanctionssystemsacriticalreview
_version_ 1724757062421839872