Electronic Monitoring in Europe – a Panacea for Reforming Criminal Sanctions Systems? A Critical Review
[full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian] First experiments with electronic monitoring emerged in Europe in the early 1990s. Within 15 years, the majority of countries in Europe reported having introduced electronic monitoring at least as pilot projects. The amazing dynamic ris...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Vilnius University Press
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Kriminologijos studijos |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.journals.vu.lt/kriminologijos-studijos/article/view/12674 |
id |
doaj-8105f5a949824d36a38db03d8fd95ccc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8105f5a949824d36a38db03d8fd95ccc2020-11-25T02:46:37ZengVilnius University PressKriminologijos studijos2538-87542351-60972018-12-01610.15388/CrimLithuan.2018.6.3Electronic Monitoring in Europe – a Panacea for Reforming Criminal Sanctions Systems? A Critical ReviewFrieder Dünkel0Universität Greifswald [full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian] First experiments with electronic monitoring emerged in Europe in the early 1990s. Within 15 years, the majority of countries in Europe reported having introduced electronic monitoring at least as pilot projects. The amazing dynamic rise of electronic monitoring in Europe may be explained by the commercial interests that become evident when looking at the activities of private companies selling the technique. Although electronic monitoring seems to have expanded in many countries, one has to realize its marginal role within the European sanctions systems compared to other sentencing or release options. On average, only about 3% of all probationary supervised persons were under electronic monitoring at the end of 2013. This article deals with questions regarding the impact of electronic monitoring on prison population rates and reduced reoffending, with net-widening effects and costs, essential rehabilitative support, human rights-based perspectives and the general (non)sense of electronic monitoring. http://www.journals.vu.lt/kriminologijos-studijos/article/view/12674electronic monitoringpunishmentinternational standardshuman rightscriminal justice |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Frieder Dünkel |
spellingShingle |
Frieder Dünkel Electronic Monitoring in Europe – a Panacea for Reforming Criminal Sanctions Systems? A Critical Review Kriminologijos studijos electronic monitoring punishment international standards human rights criminal justice |
author_facet |
Frieder Dünkel |
author_sort |
Frieder Dünkel |
title |
Electronic Monitoring in Europe – a Panacea for Reforming Criminal Sanctions Systems? A Critical Review |
title_short |
Electronic Monitoring in Europe – a Panacea for Reforming Criminal Sanctions Systems? A Critical Review |
title_full |
Electronic Monitoring in Europe – a Panacea for Reforming Criminal Sanctions Systems? A Critical Review |
title_fullStr |
Electronic Monitoring in Europe – a Panacea for Reforming Criminal Sanctions Systems? A Critical Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Electronic Monitoring in Europe – a Panacea for Reforming Criminal Sanctions Systems? A Critical Review |
title_sort |
electronic monitoring in europe – a panacea for reforming criminal sanctions systems? a critical review |
publisher |
Vilnius University Press |
series |
Kriminologijos studijos |
issn |
2538-8754 2351-6097 |
publishDate |
2018-12-01 |
description |
[full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian]
First experiments with electronic monitoring emerged in Europe in the early 1990s. Within 15 years, the majority of countries in Europe reported having introduced electronic monitoring at least as pilot projects. The amazing dynamic rise of electronic monitoring in Europe may be explained by the commercial interests that become evident when looking at the activities of private companies selling the technique. Although electronic monitoring seems to have expanded in many countries, one has to realize its marginal role within the European sanctions systems compared to other sentencing or release options. On average, only about 3% of all probationary supervised persons were under electronic monitoring at the end of 2013. This article deals with questions regarding the impact of electronic monitoring on prison population rates and reduced reoffending, with net-widening effects and costs, essential rehabilitative support, human rights-based perspectives and the general (non)sense of electronic monitoring.
|
topic |
electronic monitoring punishment international standards human rights criminal justice |
url |
http://www.journals.vu.lt/kriminologijos-studijos/article/view/12674 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT friederdunkel electronicmonitoringineuropeapanaceaforreformingcriminalsanctionssystemsacriticalreview |
_version_ |
1724757062421839872 |