Epidemiology of infective endocarditis before after change of international guidelines: a systematic review

Introduction: All major international guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis (IE) have undergone major revisions, recommending antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) restriction to high-risk patients or foregoing AP completely. We performed a systematic review to investigate the effect of thes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael L. Williams, Mathew P. Doyle, Nicholas McNamara, Daniel Tardo, Manish Mathew, Benjamin Robinson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-03-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/17539447211002687
id doaj-81001ee7405b4defb0353f212c51e376
record_format Article
spelling doaj-81001ee7405b4defb0353f212c51e3762021-03-31T21:34:31ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease1753-94552021-03-011510.1177/17539447211002687Epidemiology of infective endocarditis before after change of international guidelines: a systematic reviewMichael L. WilliamsMathew P. DoyleNicholas McNamaraDaniel TardoManish MathewBenjamin RobinsonIntroduction: All major international guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis (IE) have undergone major revisions, recommending antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) restriction to high-risk patients or foregoing AP completely. We performed a systematic review to investigate the effect of these guideline changes on the global incidence of IE. Methods: Electronic database searches were performed using Ovid Medline, EMBASE and Web of Science. Studies were included if they compared the incidence of IE prior to and following any change in international guideline recommendations. Relevant studies fulfilling the predefined search criteria were categorized according to their inclusion of either adult or pediatric patients. Incidence of IE, causative microorganisms and AP prescription rates were compared following international guideline updates. Results: Sixteen studies were included, reporting over 1.3 million cases of IE. The crude incidence of IE following guideline updates has increased globally. Adjusted incidence increased in one study after European guideline updates, while North American rates did not increase. Cases of IE with a causative pathogen identified ranged from 62% to 91%. Rates of streptococcal IE varied across adult and pediatric populations, while the relative proportion of staphylococcal IE increased (range pre-guidelines 16–24.8%, range post-guidelines 26–43%). AP prescription trends were reduced in both moderate and high-risk patients following guideline updates. Discussion: The restriction of AP to only high-risk patients has not resulted in an increase in the incidence of streptococcal IE in North American populations. The evidence of the impact of AP restriction on IE incidence is still unclear for other populations. Future population-based studies with adjusted incidence of IE, AP prescription rates and accurate pathogen identification are required to delineate findings further in these other regions.https://doi.org/10.1177/17539447211002687
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael L. Williams
Mathew P. Doyle
Nicholas McNamara
Daniel Tardo
Manish Mathew
Benjamin Robinson
spellingShingle Michael L. Williams
Mathew P. Doyle
Nicholas McNamara
Daniel Tardo
Manish Mathew
Benjamin Robinson
Epidemiology of infective endocarditis before after change of international guidelines: a systematic review
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease
author_facet Michael L. Williams
Mathew P. Doyle
Nicholas McNamara
Daniel Tardo
Manish Mathew
Benjamin Robinson
author_sort Michael L. Williams
title Epidemiology of infective endocarditis before after change of international guidelines: a systematic review
title_short Epidemiology of infective endocarditis before after change of international guidelines: a systematic review
title_full Epidemiology of infective endocarditis before after change of international guidelines: a systematic review
title_fullStr Epidemiology of infective endocarditis before after change of international guidelines: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiology of infective endocarditis before after change of international guidelines: a systematic review
title_sort epidemiology of infective endocarditis before after change of international guidelines: a systematic review
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease
issn 1753-9455
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Introduction: All major international guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis (IE) have undergone major revisions, recommending antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) restriction to high-risk patients or foregoing AP completely. We performed a systematic review to investigate the effect of these guideline changes on the global incidence of IE. Methods: Electronic database searches were performed using Ovid Medline, EMBASE and Web of Science. Studies were included if they compared the incidence of IE prior to and following any change in international guideline recommendations. Relevant studies fulfilling the predefined search criteria were categorized according to their inclusion of either adult or pediatric patients. Incidence of IE, causative microorganisms and AP prescription rates were compared following international guideline updates. Results: Sixteen studies were included, reporting over 1.3 million cases of IE. The crude incidence of IE following guideline updates has increased globally. Adjusted incidence increased in one study after European guideline updates, while North American rates did not increase. Cases of IE with a causative pathogen identified ranged from 62% to 91%. Rates of streptococcal IE varied across adult and pediatric populations, while the relative proportion of staphylococcal IE increased (range pre-guidelines 16–24.8%, range post-guidelines 26–43%). AP prescription trends were reduced in both moderate and high-risk patients following guideline updates. Discussion: The restriction of AP to only high-risk patients has not resulted in an increase in the incidence of streptococcal IE in North American populations. The evidence of the impact of AP restriction on IE incidence is still unclear for other populations. Future population-based studies with adjusted incidence of IE, AP prescription rates and accurate pathogen identification are required to delineate findings further in these other regions.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/17539447211002687
work_keys_str_mv AT michaellwilliams epidemiologyofinfectiveendocarditisbeforeafterchangeofinternationalguidelinesasystematicreview
AT mathewpdoyle epidemiologyofinfectiveendocarditisbeforeafterchangeofinternationalguidelinesasystematicreview
AT nicholasmcnamara epidemiologyofinfectiveendocarditisbeforeafterchangeofinternationalguidelinesasystematicreview
AT danieltardo epidemiologyofinfectiveendocarditisbeforeafterchangeofinternationalguidelinesasystematicreview
AT manishmathew epidemiologyofinfectiveendocarditisbeforeafterchangeofinternationalguidelinesasystematicreview
AT benjaminrobinson epidemiologyofinfectiveendocarditisbeforeafterchangeofinternationalguidelinesasystematicreview
_version_ 1724177268215906304