Did the Great Recession Downsize Immigrants and Native-Born Americans Differently? Unemployment Differentials by Nativity, Race and Gender from 2007 to 2013 in the U.S.

We use data from the Current Population Survey from 2007 and 2013 to investigate demographic differentials in unemployment during the Great Recession in the U.S. Although our analysis is primarily exploratory and descriptive, our major research objective is to illuminate the unemployment differentia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sharron Xuanren Wang, Arthur Sakamoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-09-01
Series:Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/5/3/49
id doaj-80f53b9263cd41f6ab6f1e2437721fac
record_format Article
spelling doaj-80f53b9263cd41f6ab6f1e2437721fac2020-11-24T22:26:04ZengMDPI AGSocial Sciences2076-07602016-09-01534910.3390/socsci5030049socsci5030049Did the Great Recession Downsize Immigrants and Native-Born Americans Differently? Unemployment Differentials by Nativity, Race and Gender from 2007 to 2013 in the U.S.Sharron Xuanren Wang0Arthur Sakamoto1Department of Sociology, Texas A&M University, 4351 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-4351, USADepartment of Sociology, Texas A&M University, 4351 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-4351, USAWe use data from the Current Population Survey from 2007 and 2013 to investigate demographic differentials in unemployment during the Great Recession in the U.S. Although our analysis is primarily exploratory and descriptive, our major research objective is to illuminate the unemployment differential between the foreign born and the native born. The findings indicate that during the height of the Great Recession, the foreign born had higher unemployment rates than the native born. However, this differential is statistically explained by their observed characteristics, such as race/ethnicity, gender, age and education. With the net of those variables and a few other demographic covariates, foreign born workers as an overall group actually had somewhat lower chances of being unemployed than native born workers. This finding is discussed in terms of the selectivity of immigrant workers and the possibility that they are somewhat more immediately dependent on having a job. After breaking down the foreign born into major racial/ethnic groups, the results suggest that foreign-born blacks and foreign-born Hispanics are particularly selective with the net of their observed characteristics. The possible sources of such differentials by race/ethnicity and by gender are discussed.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/5/3/49unemploymentGreat Recessionraceethnicityimmigrantsgender
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sharron Xuanren Wang
Arthur Sakamoto
spellingShingle Sharron Xuanren Wang
Arthur Sakamoto
Did the Great Recession Downsize Immigrants and Native-Born Americans Differently? Unemployment Differentials by Nativity, Race and Gender from 2007 to 2013 in the U.S.
Social Sciences
unemployment
Great Recession
race
ethnicity
immigrants
gender
author_facet Sharron Xuanren Wang
Arthur Sakamoto
author_sort Sharron Xuanren Wang
title Did the Great Recession Downsize Immigrants and Native-Born Americans Differently? Unemployment Differentials by Nativity, Race and Gender from 2007 to 2013 in the U.S.
title_short Did the Great Recession Downsize Immigrants and Native-Born Americans Differently? Unemployment Differentials by Nativity, Race and Gender from 2007 to 2013 in the U.S.
title_full Did the Great Recession Downsize Immigrants and Native-Born Americans Differently? Unemployment Differentials by Nativity, Race and Gender from 2007 to 2013 in the U.S.
title_fullStr Did the Great Recession Downsize Immigrants and Native-Born Americans Differently? Unemployment Differentials by Nativity, Race and Gender from 2007 to 2013 in the U.S.
title_full_unstemmed Did the Great Recession Downsize Immigrants and Native-Born Americans Differently? Unemployment Differentials by Nativity, Race and Gender from 2007 to 2013 in the U.S.
title_sort did the great recession downsize immigrants and native-born americans differently? unemployment differentials by nativity, race and gender from 2007 to 2013 in the u.s.
publisher MDPI AG
series Social Sciences
issn 2076-0760
publishDate 2016-09-01
description We use data from the Current Population Survey from 2007 and 2013 to investigate demographic differentials in unemployment during the Great Recession in the U.S. Although our analysis is primarily exploratory and descriptive, our major research objective is to illuminate the unemployment differential between the foreign born and the native born. The findings indicate that during the height of the Great Recession, the foreign born had higher unemployment rates than the native born. However, this differential is statistically explained by their observed characteristics, such as race/ethnicity, gender, age and education. With the net of those variables and a few other demographic covariates, foreign born workers as an overall group actually had somewhat lower chances of being unemployed than native born workers. This finding is discussed in terms of the selectivity of immigrant workers and the possibility that they are somewhat more immediately dependent on having a job. After breaking down the foreign born into major racial/ethnic groups, the results suggest that foreign-born blacks and foreign-born Hispanics are particularly selective with the net of their observed characteristics. The possible sources of such differentials by race/ethnicity and by gender are discussed.
topic unemployment
Great Recession
race
ethnicity
immigrants
gender
url http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/5/3/49
work_keys_str_mv AT sharronxuanrenwang didthegreatrecessiondownsizeimmigrantsandnativebornamericansdifferentlyunemploymentdifferentialsbynativityraceandgenderfrom2007to2013intheus
AT arthursakamoto didthegreatrecessiondownsizeimmigrantsandnativebornamericansdifferentlyunemploymentdifferentialsbynativityraceandgenderfrom2007to2013intheus
_version_ 1725754824173027328