Comparing the effects of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation on intubation duration and hospital stay after coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Background: Different modes of mechanical ventilation are used for respiratory support after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). This study aimed to compare the effect(s) of using adaptive support ventilation (ASV) and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) on the length of mechanic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmadreza Yazdannik, Hadi Zarei, Gholamreza Massoumi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijnmrjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-9066;year=2016;volume=21;issue=2;spage=207;epage=212;aulast=Yazdannik
id doaj-80f34a2083004714bdfed3929649761c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-80f34a2083004714bdfed3929649761c2020-11-24T23:49:16ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research1735-90662016-01-0121220721210.4103/1735-9066.178250Comparing the effects of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation on intubation duration and hospital stay after coronary artery bypass graft surgeryAhmadreza YazdannikHadi ZareiGholamreza MassoumiBackground: Different modes of mechanical ventilation are used for respiratory support after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). This study aimed to compare the effect(s) of using adaptive support ventilation (ASV) and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) on the length of mechanical ventilation (intubation duration) and hospital stay after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Materials and Methods: In a randomized control trial, 64 patients were ventilated with ASV as the experiment group or with SIMV as the control group after CABG surgery in Chamran Hospital of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. The time of tracheal intubation and the length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Data were analyzed and described using statistical analysis (independent t-test). Results: The mean time of intubation duration was significantly lower in ASV group compared with SIMV group. (4.83 h vs 6.71 h, P < 0.001). The lengths of hospital stay in the ASV and the SIMV groups were 140.6 h and 145.1 h, respectively. This difference was significant between the two groups (P = 0.006). Conclusions: According to the results of this study, using ASV mode for mechanical ventilation after CABG led to a decrease in intubation duration and also hospital stay in comparison with the SIMV group. It is recommended to use ASV mode on ventilators for respiratory support of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.http://www.ijnmrjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-9066;year=2016;volume=21;issue=2;spage=207;epage=212;aulast=YazdannikAdaptive support ventilationcardiac surgery intensive care unitcoronary artery bypasscoronary artery bypass graft surgeryintensive care unitIranmechanical ventilationnursesnursingsynchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ahmadreza Yazdannik
Hadi Zarei
Gholamreza Massoumi
spellingShingle Ahmadreza Yazdannik
Hadi Zarei
Gholamreza Massoumi
Comparing the effects of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation on intubation duration and hospital stay after coronary artery bypass graft surgery
Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research
Adaptive support ventilation
cardiac surgery intensive care unit
coronary artery bypass
coronary artery bypass graft surgery
intensive care unit
Iran
mechanical ventilation
nurses
nursing
synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation
author_facet Ahmadreza Yazdannik
Hadi Zarei
Gholamreza Massoumi
author_sort Ahmadreza Yazdannik
title Comparing the effects of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation on intubation duration and hospital stay after coronary artery bypass graft surgery
title_short Comparing the effects of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation on intubation duration and hospital stay after coronary artery bypass graft surgery
title_full Comparing the effects of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation on intubation duration and hospital stay after coronary artery bypass graft surgery
title_fullStr Comparing the effects of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation on intubation duration and hospital stay after coronary artery bypass graft surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the effects of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation on intubation duration and hospital stay after coronary artery bypass graft surgery
title_sort comparing the effects of adaptive support ventilation and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation on intubation duration and hospital stay after coronary artery bypass graft surgery
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research
issn 1735-9066
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Background: Different modes of mechanical ventilation are used for respiratory support after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). This study aimed to compare the effect(s) of using adaptive support ventilation (ASV) and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) on the length of mechanical ventilation (intubation duration) and hospital stay after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Materials and Methods: In a randomized control trial, 64 patients were ventilated with ASV as the experiment group or with SIMV as the control group after CABG surgery in Chamran Hospital of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. The time of tracheal intubation and the length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Data were analyzed and described using statistical analysis (independent t-test). Results: The mean time of intubation duration was significantly lower in ASV group compared with SIMV group. (4.83 h vs 6.71 h, P < 0.001). The lengths of hospital stay in the ASV and the SIMV groups were 140.6 h and 145.1 h, respectively. This difference was significant between the two groups (P = 0.006). Conclusions: According to the results of this study, using ASV mode for mechanical ventilation after CABG led to a decrease in intubation duration and also hospital stay in comparison with the SIMV group. It is recommended to use ASV mode on ventilators for respiratory support of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
topic Adaptive support ventilation
cardiac surgery intensive care unit
coronary artery bypass
coronary artery bypass graft surgery
intensive care unit
Iran
mechanical ventilation
nurses
nursing
synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation
url http://www.ijnmrjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-9066;year=2016;volume=21;issue=2;spage=207;epage=212;aulast=Yazdannik
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadrezayazdannik comparingtheeffectsofadaptivesupportventilationandsynchronizedintermittentmandatoryventilationonintubationdurationandhospitalstayaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgery
AT hadizarei comparingtheeffectsofadaptivesupportventilationandsynchronizedintermittentmandatoryventilationonintubationdurationandhospitalstayaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgery
AT gholamrezamassoumi comparingtheeffectsofadaptivesupportventilationandsynchronizedintermittentmandatoryventilationonintubationdurationandhospitalstayaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgery
_version_ 1725483190925131776