National mental health programme–optimism and caution: A narrative review
India was one of the major World Health Organization (WHO) member countries to launch its National Mental Health Programme (NMHP) in 1982 in accordance with WHO's recommendations to deliver mental health services to the people under the framework of general health care system in the community....
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ijpm.info/article.asp?issn=0253-7176;year=2018;volume=40;issue=6;spage=509;epage=516;aulast=Gupta |
id |
doaj-80e80becd78d4867a101bdedd5ee0b1b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-80e80becd78d4867a101bdedd5ee0b1b2021-08-02T06:49:00ZengSAGE PublishingIndian Journal of Psychological Medicine0253-71762018-01-0140650951610.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_191_18National mental health programme–optimism and caution: A narrative reviewSnehil GuptaRajesh SagarIndia was one of the major World Health Organization (WHO) member countries to launch its National Mental Health Programme (NMHP) in 1982 in accordance with WHO's recommendations to deliver mental health services to the people under the framework of general health care system in the community. NMHP underwent major strategic revisions over its course, starting from setting a district as the unit for program planning and implementation under the District Mental Health Program (DMHP) to incorporating it with the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) for effectively scaling up the program. The program also underwent evaluations by government bodies and independent agencies and was reviewed by many researchers. The program has been partly successful in terms of enhancing its reach to community, improving service delivery, and getting increased budgetary allocation, but at the same time, its impact was limited by financial and human resource constraints, lack of community participation, ineffective training, poor NGO/private partnership, and lack of a robust monitoring and evaluation (M and E) system. The latest National Mental Health Policy and the incorporation of its objectives have given a new impetus to the ongoing NMHP, however, its implementation needs to be monitored and the impact is yet to be evaluated. We attempted to review the available literature pertaining to NMHP and DMHP to highlight the determinants of its outcome, with special emphasis on on-going programs and to provide some important future directions.http://www.ijpm.info/article.asp?issn=0253-7176;year=2018;volume=40;issue=6;spage=509;epage=516;aulast=Gupta12th Five-Year Plancommunity mental health and community mental health programmeDistrict Mental Health ProgramNational Mental Health Programme |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Snehil Gupta Rajesh Sagar |
spellingShingle |
Snehil Gupta Rajesh Sagar National mental health programme–optimism and caution: A narrative review Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine 12th Five-Year Plan community mental health and community mental health programme District Mental Health Program National Mental Health Programme |
author_facet |
Snehil Gupta Rajesh Sagar |
author_sort |
Snehil Gupta |
title |
National mental health programme–optimism and caution: A narrative review |
title_short |
National mental health programme–optimism and caution: A narrative review |
title_full |
National mental health programme–optimism and caution: A narrative review |
title_fullStr |
National mental health programme–optimism and caution: A narrative review |
title_full_unstemmed |
National mental health programme–optimism and caution: A narrative review |
title_sort |
national mental health programme–optimism and caution: a narrative review |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine |
issn |
0253-7176 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
India was one of the major World Health Organization (WHO) member countries to launch its National Mental Health Programme (NMHP) in 1982 in accordance with WHO's recommendations to deliver mental health services to the people under the framework of general health care system in the community. NMHP underwent major strategic revisions over its course, starting from setting a district as the unit for program planning and implementation under the District Mental Health Program (DMHP) to incorporating it with the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) for effectively scaling up the program. The program also underwent evaluations by government bodies and independent agencies and was reviewed by many researchers. The program has been partly successful in terms of enhancing its reach to community, improving service delivery, and getting increased budgetary allocation, but at the same time, its impact was limited by financial and human resource constraints, lack of community participation, ineffective training, poor NGO/private partnership, and lack of a robust monitoring and evaluation (M and E) system. The latest National Mental Health Policy and the incorporation of its objectives have given a new impetus to the ongoing NMHP, however, its implementation needs to be monitored and the impact is yet to be evaluated. We attempted to review the available literature pertaining to NMHP and DMHP to highlight the determinants of its outcome, with special emphasis on on-going programs and to provide some important future directions. |
topic |
12th Five-Year Plan community mental health and community mental health programme District Mental Health Program National Mental Health Programme |
url |
http://www.ijpm.info/article.asp?issn=0253-7176;year=2018;volume=40;issue=6;spage=509;epage=516;aulast=Gupta |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT snehilgupta nationalmentalhealthprogrammeoptimismandcautionanarrativereview AT rajeshsagar nationalmentalhealthprogrammeoptimismandcautionanarrativereview |
_version_ |
1721239883837603840 |