Does burst-suppression achieve seizure control in refractory status epilepticus?

Abstract Background The general principles in the administration of anesthetic drugs entail not only the suppression of seizure activity but also the achievement of electroencephalography burst suppression (BS). However, previous studies have reported conflicting results, possibly owing to the inclu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kanitpong Phabphal, Suparat Chisurajinda, Thapanee Somboon, Kanjana Unwongse, Alan Geater
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-04-01
Series:BMC Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12883-018-1050-3
id doaj-80e765cecebe4865a61caf9fa4afc05b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-80e765cecebe4865a61caf9fa4afc05b2020-11-24T21:50:30ZengBMCBMC Neurology1471-23772018-04-011811710.1186/s12883-018-1050-3Does burst-suppression achieve seizure control in refractory status epilepticus?Kanitpong Phabphal0Suparat Chisurajinda1Thapanee Somboon2Kanjana Unwongse3Alan Geater4Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityNeurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityPrasat Neurological InstitutePrasat Neurological InstituteEpidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityAbstract Background The general principles in the administration of anesthetic drugs entail not only the suppression of seizure activity but also the achievement of electroencephalography burst suppression (BS). However, previous studies have reported conflicting results, possibly owing to the inclusion of various anesthetic agents, not all patients undergoing continuous electroencephalography (cEEG), and the inclusion of anoxic encephalopathy. This study aimed to analyze the effects of midazolam-induced BS on the occurrence outcomes in refractory status epilepticus patients. Methods Based on a prospective database of patients who had been diagnosed with status epilepticus via cEEG, multivariate Poisson regression modules were used to estimate the effect of midazolam-induced BS on breakthrough seizure, withdrawal seizure, intra-hospital complications, functional outcome at 3 months, and mortality. Modules were based on a pre-compiled directed acyclic graph (DAG). Results We included 51 non-anoxic encephalopathy, refractory status epilepticus patients. Burst suppression was achieved in 26 patients (51%); 25 patients (49%) had non-burst suppression on their cEEG. Breakthrough seizure was less often seen in the burst suppression group than in the non-burst suppression group. The incidence risk ratio [IRR] was 0.30 (95% confidence interval = 0.13–0.74). There was weak evidence of an association between BS and increased withdrawal seizure, but no association between BS and intra-hospital complications, mortality or functional outcomes was observed. Conclusion This study provides evidence that BS is safe and associated with less breakthrough seizures. Additionally, it was not associated with an increased rate of intra-hospital complications or long-term outcomes.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12883-018-1050-3Burst suppressionRefractory status epilepticusMidazolamOutcome
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kanitpong Phabphal
Suparat Chisurajinda
Thapanee Somboon
Kanjana Unwongse
Alan Geater
spellingShingle Kanitpong Phabphal
Suparat Chisurajinda
Thapanee Somboon
Kanjana Unwongse
Alan Geater
Does burst-suppression achieve seizure control in refractory status epilepticus?
BMC Neurology
Burst suppression
Refractory status epilepticus
Midazolam
Outcome
author_facet Kanitpong Phabphal
Suparat Chisurajinda
Thapanee Somboon
Kanjana Unwongse
Alan Geater
author_sort Kanitpong Phabphal
title Does burst-suppression achieve seizure control in refractory status epilepticus?
title_short Does burst-suppression achieve seizure control in refractory status epilepticus?
title_full Does burst-suppression achieve seizure control in refractory status epilepticus?
title_fullStr Does burst-suppression achieve seizure control in refractory status epilepticus?
title_full_unstemmed Does burst-suppression achieve seizure control in refractory status epilepticus?
title_sort does burst-suppression achieve seizure control in refractory status epilepticus?
publisher BMC
series BMC Neurology
issn 1471-2377
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Abstract Background The general principles in the administration of anesthetic drugs entail not only the suppression of seizure activity but also the achievement of electroencephalography burst suppression (BS). However, previous studies have reported conflicting results, possibly owing to the inclusion of various anesthetic agents, not all patients undergoing continuous electroencephalography (cEEG), and the inclusion of anoxic encephalopathy. This study aimed to analyze the effects of midazolam-induced BS on the occurrence outcomes in refractory status epilepticus patients. Methods Based on a prospective database of patients who had been diagnosed with status epilepticus via cEEG, multivariate Poisson regression modules were used to estimate the effect of midazolam-induced BS on breakthrough seizure, withdrawal seizure, intra-hospital complications, functional outcome at 3 months, and mortality. Modules were based on a pre-compiled directed acyclic graph (DAG). Results We included 51 non-anoxic encephalopathy, refractory status epilepticus patients. Burst suppression was achieved in 26 patients (51%); 25 patients (49%) had non-burst suppression on their cEEG. Breakthrough seizure was less often seen in the burst suppression group than in the non-burst suppression group. The incidence risk ratio [IRR] was 0.30 (95% confidence interval = 0.13–0.74). There was weak evidence of an association between BS and increased withdrawal seizure, but no association between BS and intra-hospital complications, mortality or functional outcomes was observed. Conclusion This study provides evidence that BS is safe and associated with less breakthrough seizures. Additionally, it was not associated with an increased rate of intra-hospital complications or long-term outcomes.
topic Burst suppression
Refractory status epilepticus
Midazolam
Outcome
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12883-018-1050-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kanitpongphabphal doesburstsuppressionachieveseizurecontrolinrefractorystatusepilepticus
AT suparatchisurajinda doesburstsuppressionachieveseizurecontrolinrefractorystatusepilepticus
AT thapaneesomboon doesburstsuppressionachieveseizurecontrolinrefractorystatusepilepticus
AT kanjanaunwongse doesburstsuppressionachieveseizurecontrolinrefractorystatusepilepticus
AT alangeater doesburstsuppressionachieveseizurecontrolinrefractorystatusepilepticus
_version_ 1725883472369680384