Does burst-suppression achieve seizure control in refractory status epilepticus?
Abstract Background The general principles in the administration of anesthetic drugs entail not only the suppression of seizure activity but also the achievement of electroencephalography burst suppression (BS). However, previous studies have reported conflicting results, possibly owing to the inclu...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Neurology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12883-018-1050-3 |
id |
doaj-80e765cecebe4865a61caf9fa4afc05b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-80e765cecebe4865a61caf9fa4afc05b2020-11-24T21:50:30ZengBMCBMC Neurology1471-23772018-04-011811710.1186/s12883-018-1050-3Does burst-suppression achieve seizure control in refractory status epilepticus?Kanitpong Phabphal0Suparat Chisurajinda1Thapanee Somboon2Kanjana Unwongse3Alan Geater4Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityNeurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityPrasat Neurological InstitutePrasat Neurological InstituteEpidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityAbstract Background The general principles in the administration of anesthetic drugs entail not only the suppression of seizure activity but also the achievement of electroencephalography burst suppression (BS). However, previous studies have reported conflicting results, possibly owing to the inclusion of various anesthetic agents, not all patients undergoing continuous electroencephalography (cEEG), and the inclusion of anoxic encephalopathy. This study aimed to analyze the effects of midazolam-induced BS on the occurrence outcomes in refractory status epilepticus patients. Methods Based on a prospective database of patients who had been diagnosed with status epilepticus via cEEG, multivariate Poisson regression modules were used to estimate the effect of midazolam-induced BS on breakthrough seizure, withdrawal seizure, intra-hospital complications, functional outcome at 3 months, and mortality. Modules were based on a pre-compiled directed acyclic graph (DAG). Results We included 51 non-anoxic encephalopathy, refractory status epilepticus patients. Burst suppression was achieved in 26 patients (51%); 25 patients (49%) had non-burst suppression on their cEEG. Breakthrough seizure was less often seen in the burst suppression group than in the non-burst suppression group. The incidence risk ratio [IRR] was 0.30 (95% confidence interval = 0.13–0.74). There was weak evidence of an association between BS and increased withdrawal seizure, but no association between BS and intra-hospital complications, mortality or functional outcomes was observed. Conclusion This study provides evidence that BS is safe and associated with less breakthrough seizures. Additionally, it was not associated with an increased rate of intra-hospital complications or long-term outcomes.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12883-018-1050-3Burst suppressionRefractory status epilepticusMidazolamOutcome |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kanitpong Phabphal Suparat Chisurajinda Thapanee Somboon Kanjana Unwongse Alan Geater |
spellingShingle |
Kanitpong Phabphal Suparat Chisurajinda Thapanee Somboon Kanjana Unwongse Alan Geater Does burst-suppression achieve seizure control in refractory status epilepticus? BMC Neurology Burst suppression Refractory status epilepticus Midazolam Outcome |
author_facet |
Kanitpong Phabphal Suparat Chisurajinda Thapanee Somboon Kanjana Unwongse Alan Geater |
author_sort |
Kanitpong Phabphal |
title |
Does burst-suppression achieve seizure control in refractory status epilepticus? |
title_short |
Does burst-suppression achieve seizure control in refractory status epilepticus? |
title_full |
Does burst-suppression achieve seizure control in refractory status epilepticus? |
title_fullStr |
Does burst-suppression achieve seizure control in refractory status epilepticus? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does burst-suppression achieve seizure control in refractory status epilepticus? |
title_sort |
does burst-suppression achieve seizure control in refractory status epilepticus? |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Neurology |
issn |
1471-2377 |
publishDate |
2018-04-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The general principles in the administration of anesthetic drugs entail not only the suppression of seizure activity but also the achievement of electroencephalography burst suppression (BS). However, previous studies have reported conflicting results, possibly owing to the inclusion of various anesthetic agents, not all patients undergoing continuous electroencephalography (cEEG), and the inclusion of anoxic encephalopathy. This study aimed to analyze the effects of midazolam-induced BS on the occurrence outcomes in refractory status epilepticus patients. Methods Based on a prospective database of patients who had been diagnosed with status epilepticus via cEEG, multivariate Poisson regression modules were used to estimate the effect of midazolam-induced BS on breakthrough seizure, withdrawal seizure, intra-hospital complications, functional outcome at 3 months, and mortality. Modules were based on a pre-compiled directed acyclic graph (DAG). Results We included 51 non-anoxic encephalopathy, refractory status epilepticus patients. Burst suppression was achieved in 26 patients (51%); 25 patients (49%) had non-burst suppression on their cEEG. Breakthrough seizure was less often seen in the burst suppression group than in the non-burst suppression group. The incidence risk ratio [IRR] was 0.30 (95% confidence interval = 0.13–0.74). There was weak evidence of an association between BS and increased withdrawal seizure, but no association between BS and intra-hospital complications, mortality or functional outcomes was observed. Conclusion This study provides evidence that BS is safe and associated with less breakthrough seizures. Additionally, it was not associated with an increased rate of intra-hospital complications or long-term outcomes. |
topic |
Burst suppression Refractory status epilepticus Midazolam Outcome |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12883-018-1050-3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kanitpongphabphal doesburstsuppressionachieveseizurecontrolinrefractorystatusepilepticus AT suparatchisurajinda doesburstsuppressionachieveseizurecontrolinrefractorystatusepilepticus AT thapaneesomboon doesburstsuppressionachieveseizurecontrolinrefractorystatusepilepticus AT kanjanaunwongse doesburstsuppressionachieveseizurecontrolinrefractorystatusepilepticus AT alangeater doesburstsuppressionachieveseizurecontrolinrefractorystatusepilepticus |
_version_ |
1725883472369680384 |