Defining State Authority: UN Peace Operations Efforts to Extend State Authority in Mali and the Central African Republic

In a state-based international order, the state is understood as the best actor to protect its population. With this in mind, UN peace operations often have mandates to extend state authority. However, by their very nature, peace operations deploy to states whose authority and legitimacy are contest...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shannon Zimmerman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre for Security Governance 2020-03-01
Series:Stability : International Journal of Security and Development
Online Access:https://www.stabilityjournal.org/articles/762
id doaj-80e5fcdf18ba4e0ea256e43853e40301
record_format Article
spelling doaj-80e5fcdf18ba4e0ea256e43853e403012020-11-25T03:27:59ZengCentre for Security GovernanceStability : International Journal of Security and Development2165-26272020-03-019110.5334/sta.762252Defining State Authority: UN Peace Operations Efforts to Extend State Authority in Mali and the Central African RepublicShannon Zimmerman0University of QueenslandIn a state-based international order, the state is understood as the best actor to protect its population. With this in mind, UN peace operations often have mandates to extend state authority. However, by their very nature, peace operations deploy to states whose authority and legitimacy are contested. Without a clear definition of what that authority entails, peace operations and host states must constantly negotiate the content and approaches taken in extending state authority, sometimes resulting in tensions between state and mission. This article examines the process of extending state authority in two cases: the UN Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in the Central African Republic (MINUSCA) and the UN Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA). It finds that there are evolving and contesting understandings of state authority across and within peace operations, which can limit mission impact and stress key relationships between peace operations and their host state. The article concludes that there is a need for renewed conversations in the UN as to how state authority is understood and supported by UN peace operations.https://www.stabilityjournal.org/articles/762
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shannon Zimmerman
spellingShingle Shannon Zimmerman
Defining State Authority: UN Peace Operations Efforts to Extend State Authority in Mali and the Central African Republic
Stability : International Journal of Security and Development
author_facet Shannon Zimmerman
author_sort Shannon Zimmerman
title Defining State Authority: UN Peace Operations Efforts to Extend State Authority in Mali and the Central African Republic
title_short Defining State Authority: UN Peace Operations Efforts to Extend State Authority in Mali and the Central African Republic
title_full Defining State Authority: UN Peace Operations Efforts to Extend State Authority in Mali and the Central African Republic
title_fullStr Defining State Authority: UN Peace Operations Efforts to Extend State Authority in Mali and the Central African Republic
title_full_unstemmed Defining State Authority: UN Peace Operations Efforts to Extend State Authority in Mali and the Central African Republic
title_sort defining state authority: un peace operations efforts to extend state authority in mali and the central african republic
publisher Centre for Security Governance
series Stability : International Journal of Security and Development
issn 2165-2627
publishDate 2020-03-01
description In a state-based international order, the state is understood as the best actor to protect its population. With this in mind, UN peace operations often have mandates to extend state authority. However, by their very nature, peace operations deploy to states whose authority and legitimacy are contested. Without a clear definition of what that authority entails, peace operations and host states must constantly negotiate the content and approaches taken in extending state authority, sometimes resulting in tensions between state and mission. This article examines the process of extending state authority in two cases: the UN Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in the Central African Republic (MINUSCA) and the UN Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA). It finds that there are evolving and contesting understandings of state authority across and within peace operations, which can limit mission impact and stress key relationships between peace operations and their host state. The article concludes that there is a need for renewed conversations in the UN as to how state authority is understood and supported by UN peace operations.
url https://www.stabilityjournal.org/articles/762
work_keys_str_mv AT shannonzimmerman definingstateauthorityunpeaceoperationseffortstoextendstateauthorityinmaliandthecentralafricanrepublic
_version_ 1724585995436818432