Measuring the quality of Patients’ goals and action plans: development and validation of a novel tool
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The purpose of this study is to develop and test reliability, validity, and utility of the Goal-Setting Evaluation Tool for Diabetes (GET-D). The effectiveness of diabetes self-management is predicated on goal-setting and action plan...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2012-12-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/12/152 |
id |
doaj-80e40a6853c1469aa431e6f15f82c15b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-80e40a6853c1469aa431e6f15f82c15b2020-11-24T22:20:28ZengBMCBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making1472-69472012-12-0112115210.1186/1472-6947-12-152Measuring the quality of Patients’ goals and action plans: development and validation of a novel toolTeal Cayla RHaidet PaulBalasubramanyam Ajay SRodriguez ElisaNaik Aanand D<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The purpose of this study is to develop and test reliability, validity, and utility of the Goal-Setting Evaluation Tool for Diabetes (GET-D). The effectiveness of diabetes self-management is predicated on goal-setting and action planning strategies. Evaluation of self-management interventions is hampered by the absence of tools to assess quality of goals and action plans. To address this gap, we developed the GET-D, a criteria-based, observer rating scale that measures the quality of patients’ diabetes goals and action plans.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We conducted 3-stage development of GET-D, including identification of criteria for observer ratings of goals and action plans, rater training and pilot testing; and then performed psychometric testing of the GET-D.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Trained raters could effectively rate the quality of patient-generated goals and action plans using the GET-D. Ratings performed by trained evaluators demonstrated good raw agreement (94.4%) and inter-rater reliability (Kappa = 0.66). Scores on the GET-D correlated well with measures theoretically associated with goal-setting, including patient activation (r=.252, P<.05), diabetes specific self-efficacy (r=.376, P<.001) and inverse relationship with depression (r= −.376, P<.01). Significant between group differences (P<.01) in GET-D scores between goal-setting intervention (mean = 7.33, standard deviation = 4.4) and education groups (mean = 4.93, standard deviation = 3.9) confirmed construct validity of the GET-D.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The GET-D can reliably and validly rate the quality of goals and action plans. It holds promise as a measure of intervention fidelity for clinical interventions that promote diabetes self-management behaviors to improve clinical outcomes.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00481286</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/12/152Goal-settingDiabetesSelf-managementGoalsAction plansMeasurement |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Teal Cayla R Haidet Paul Balasubramanyam Ajay S Rodriguez Elisa Naik Aanand D |
spellingShingle |
Teal Cayla R Haidet Paul Balasubramanyam Ajay S Rodriguez Elisa Naik Aanand D Measuring the quality of Patients’ goals and action plans: development and validation of a novel tool BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making Goal-setting Diabetes Self-management Goals Action plans Measurement |
author_facet |
Teal Cayla R Haidet Paul Balasubramanyam Ajay S Rodriguez Elisa Naik Aanand D |
author_sort |
Teal Cayla R |
title |
Measuring the quality of Patients’ goals and action plans: development and validation of a novel tool |
title_short |
Measuring the quality of Patients’ goals and action plans: development and validation of a novel tool |
title_full |
Measuring the quality of Patients’ goals and action plans: development and validation of a novel tool |
title_fullStr |
Measuring the quality of Patients’ goals and action plans: development and validation of a novel tool |
title_full_unstemmed |
Measuring the quality of Patients’ goals and action plans: development and validation of a novel tool |
title_sort |
measuring the quality of patients’ goals and action plans: development and validation of a novel tool |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making |
issn |
1472-6947 |
publishDate |
2012-12-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The purpose of this study is to develop and test reliability, validity, and utility of the Goal-Setting Evaluation Tool for Diabetes (GET-D). The effectiveness of diabetes self-management is predicated on goal-setting and action planning strategies. Evaluation of self-management interventions is hampered by the absence of tools to assess quality of goals and action plans. To address this gap, we developed the GET-D, a criteria-based, observer rating scale that measures the quality of patients’ diabetes goals and action plans.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We conducted 3-stage development of GET-D, including identification of criteria for observer ratings of goals and action plans, rater training and pilot testing; and then performed psychometric testing of the GET-D.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Trained raters could effectively rate the quality of patient-generated goals and action plans using the GET-D. Ratings performed by trained evaluators demonstrated good raw agreement (94.4%) and inter-rater reliability (Kappa = 0.66). Scores on the GET-D correlated well with measures theoretically associated with goal-setting, including patient activation (r=.252, P<.05), diabetes specific self-efficacy (r=.376, P<.001) and inverse relationship with depression (r= −.376, P<.01). Significant between group differences (P<.01) in GET-D scores between goal-setting intervention (mean = 7.33, standard deviation = 4.4) and education groups (mean = 4.93, standard deviation = 3.9) confirmed construct validity of the GET-D.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The GET-D can reliably and validly rate the quality of goals and action plans. It holds promise as a measure of intervention fidelity for clinical interventions that promote diabetes self-management behaviors to improve clinical outcomes.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00481286</p> |
topic |
Goal-setting Diabetes Self-management Goals Action plans Measurement |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/12/152 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tealcaylar measuringthequalityofpatientsgoalsandactionplansdevelopmentandvalidationofanoveltool AT haidetpaul measuringthequalityofpatientsgoalsandactionplansdevelopmentandvalidationofanoveltool AT balasubramanyamajays measuringthequalityofpatientsgoalsandactionplansdevelopmentandvalidationofanoveltool AT rodriguezelisa measuringthequalityofpatientsgoalsandactionplansdevelopmentandvalidationofanoveltool AT naikaanandd measuringthequalityofpatientsgoalsandactionplansdevelopmentandvalidationofanoveltool |
_version_ |
1725775150217953280 |