Decentralised facility-based training as an alternative model for SLMTA implementation: The Cameroon experience

Background:The Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation (SLMTA) programme is designed to build institutional capacity to help strengthen the tiered laboratorysystem. Most countries implement the SLMTA three-workshop series using a centralised model, whereby participants from several...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juliana Ndasi, Laura Dimite, Victor Mbome, Charles Awasom, Elive Ngale, Sidney Akuro, Ewane Leonard, Omotayo Bolu, Terrence Asong, Patrick Njukeng, Judith Shang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2014-11-01
Series:African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Online Access:https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/231
id doaj-80bb0c687c95415884016ed80ff25df4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-80bb0c687c95415884016ed80ff25df42020-11-25T00:10:51ZengAOSISAfrican Journal of Laboratory Medicine2225-20022225-20102014-11-0132e1e610.4102/ajlm.v3i2.23169Decentralised facility-based training as an alternative model for SLMTA implementation: The Cameroon experienceJuliana Ndasi0Laura Dimite1Victor Mbome2Charles Awasom3Elive Ngale4Sidney Akuro5Ewane Leonard6Omotayo Bolu7Terrence Asong8Patrick Njukeng9Judith Shang10Global Health Systems SolutionsUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)Buea Regional Hospital, South West RegionRegional Hospital Bamenda, North West RegionGlobal Health Systems SolutionsGlobal Health Systems SolutionsGlobal Health Systems SolutionsUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)US Centers for Disease Control and Preventin (CDC)Global Health Systems SolutionsUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)Background:The Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation (SLMTA) programme is designed to build institutional capacity to help strengthen the tiered laboratorysystem. Most countries implement the SLMTA three-workshop series using a centralised model, whereby participants from several laboratories travel to one location to be trained together. Objectives: We assessed the effectiveness and cost of conducting SLMTA training in adecentralised manner as compared to centralised training. Methods: SLMTA was implemented in five pilot laboratories in Cameroon between October 2010 and October 2012 by means of a series of workshops, laboratory improvement projects and on-site mentorship. The first workshop was conducted in the traditional centralised approach. The second and third workshops were decentralised, delivered on-site at each of the five enrolled laboratories. Progress was monitored by repeated audits using the Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) checklist. Results: Audit scores for all laboratories improved steadily through the course of the programme. Median improvement was 11 percentage points after the first (centralised) training and an additional 24 percentage points after the second (decentralised) training. Estimated per-laboratory cost of the two training models was approximately the same at US$21 000. However, in the decentralised model approximately five times as many staff members were trained, although it also required five times the amount of trainer time. Conclusion: Decentralised SLMTA training was effective in improving laboratory qualityand should be considered as an alternative to centralised training.https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/231
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Juliana Ndasi
Laura Dimite
Victor Mbome
Charles Awasom
Elive Ngale
Sidney Akuro
Ewane Leonard
Omotayo Bolu
Terrence Asong
Patrick Njukeng
Judith Shang
spellingShingle Juliana Ndasi
Laura Dimite
Victor Mbome
Charles Awasom
Elive Ngale
Sidney Akuro
Ewane Leonard
Omotayo Bolu
Terrence Asong
Patrick Njukeng
Judith Shang
Decentralised facility-based training as an alternative model for SLMTA implementation: The Cameroon experience
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
author_facet Juliana Ndasi
Laura Dimite
Victor Mbome
Charles Awasom
Elive Ngale
Sidney Akuro
Ewane Leonard
Omotayo Bolu
Terrence Asong
Patrick Njukeng
Judith Shang
author_sort Juliana Ndasi
title Decentralised facility-based training as an alternative model for SLMTA implementation: The Cameroon experience
title_short Decentralised facility-based training as an alternative model for SLMTA implementation: The Cameroon experience
title_full Decentralised facility-based training as an alternative model for SLMTA implementation: The Cameroon experience
title_fullStr Decentralised facility-based training as an alternative model for SLMTA implementation: The Cameroon experience
title_full_unstemmed Decentralised facility-based training as an alternative model for SLMTA implementation: The Cameroon experience
title_sort decentralised facility-based training as an alternative model for slmta implementation: the cameroon experience
publisher AOSIS
series African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
issn 2225-2002
2225-2010
publishDate 2014-11-01
description Background:The Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation (SLMTA) programme is designed to build institutional capacity to help strengthen the tiered laboratorysystem. Most countries implement the SLMTA three-workshop series using a centralised model, whereby participants from several laboratories travel to one location to be trained together. Objectives: We assessed the effectiveness and cost of conducting SLMTA training in adecentralised manner as compared to centralised training. Methods: SLMTA was implemented in five pilot laboratories in Cameroon between October 2010 and October 2012 by means of a series of workshops, laboratory improvement projects and on-site mentorship. The first workshop was conducted in the traditional centralised approach. The second and third workshops were decentralised, delivered on-site at each of the five enrolled laboratories. Progress was monitored by repeated audits using the Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) checklist. Results: Audit scores for all laboratories improved steadily through the course of the programme. Median improvement was 11 percentage points after the first (centralised) training and an additional 24 percentage points after the second (decentralised) training. Estimated per-laboratory cost of the two training models was approximately the same at US$21 000. However, in the decentralised model approximately five times as many staff members were trained, although it also required five times the amount of trainer time. Conclusion: Decentralised SLMTA training was effective in improving laboratory qualityand should be considered as an alternative to centralised training.
url https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/231
work_keys_str_mv AT julianandasi decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience
AT lauradimite decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience
AT victormbome decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience
AT charlesawasom decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience
AT elivengale decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience
AT sidneyakuro decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience
AT ewaneleonard decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience
AT omotayobolu decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience
AT terrenceasong decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience
AT patricknjukeng decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience
AT judithshang decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience
_version_ 1725406689070415872