Decentralised facility-based training as an alternative model for SLMTA implementation: The Cameroon experience
Background:The Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation (SLMTA) programme is designed to build institutional capacity to help strengthen the tiered laboratorysystem. Most countries implement the SLMTA three-workshop series using a centralised model, whereby participants from several...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
AOSIS
2014-11-01
|
Series: | African Journal of Laboratory Medicine |
Online Access: | https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/231 |
id |
doaj-80bb0c687c95415884016ed80ff25df4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-80bb0c687c95415884016ed80ff25df42020-11-25T00:10:51ZengAOSISAfrican Journal of Laboratory Medicine2225-20022225-20102014-11-0132e1e610.4102/ajlm.v3i2.23169Decentralised facility-based training as an alternative model for SLMTA implementation: The Cameroon experienceJuliana Ndasi0Laura Dimite1Victor Mbome2Charles Awasom3Elive Ngale4Sidney Akuro5Ewane Leonard6Omotayo Bolu7Terrence Asong8Patrick Njukeng9Judith Shang10Global Health Systems SolutionsUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)Buea Regional Hospital, South West RegionRegional Hospital Bamenda, North West RegionGlobal Health Systems SolutionsGlobal Health Systems SolutionsGlobal Health Systems SolutionsUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)US Centers for Disease Control and Preventin (CDC)Global Health Systems SolutionsUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)Background:The Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation (SLMTA) programme is designed to build institutional capacity to help strengthen the tiered laboratorysystem. Most countries implement the SLMTA three-workshop series using a centralised model, whereby participants from several laboratories travel to one location to be trained together. Objectives: We assessed the effectiveness and cost of conducting SLMTA training in adecentralised manner as compared to centralised training. Methods: SLMTA was implemented in five pilot laboratories in Cameroon between October 2010 and October 2012 by means of a series of workshops, laboratory improvement projects and on-site mentorship. The first workshop was conducted in the traditional centralised approach. The second and third workshops were decentralised, delivered on-site at each of the five enrolled laboratories. Progress was monitored by repeated audits using the Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) checklist. Results: Audit scores for all laboratories improved steadily through the course of the programme. Median improvement was 11 percentage points after the first (centralised) training and an additional 24 percentage points after the second (decentralised) training. Estimated per-laboratory cost of the two training models was approximately the same at US$21 000. However, in the decentralised model approximately five times as many staff members were trained, although it also required five times the amount of trainer time. Conclusion: Decentralised SLMTA training was effective in improving laboratory qualityand should be considered as an alternative to centralised training.https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/231 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Juliana Ndasi Laura Dimite Victor Mbome Charles Awasom Elive Ngale Sidney Akuro Ewane Leonard Omotayo Bolu Terrence Asong Patrick Njukeng Judith Shang |
spellingShingle |
Juliana Ndasi Laura Dimite Victor Mbome Charles Awasom Elive Ngale Sidney Akuro Ewane Leonard Omotayo Bolu Terrence Asong Patrick Njukeng Judith Shang Decentralised facility-based training as an alternative model for SLMTA implementation: The Cameroon experience African Journal of Laboratory Medicine |
author_facet |
Juliana Ndasi Laura Dimite Victor Mbome Charles Awasom Elive Ngale Sidney Akuro Ewane Leonard Omotayo Bolu Terrence Asong Patrick Njukeng Judith Shang |
author_sort |
Juliana Ndasi |
title |
Decentralised facility-based training as an alternative model for SLMTA implementation: The Cameroon experience |
title_short |
Decentralised facility-based training as an alternative model for SLMTA implementation: The Cameroon experience |
title_full |
Decentralised facility-based training as an alternative model for SLMTA implementation: The Cameroon experience |
title_fullStr |
Decentralised facility-based training as an alternative model for SLMTA implementation: The Cameroon experience |
title_full_unstemmed |
Decentralised facility-based training as an alternative model for SLMTA implementation: The Cameroon experience |
title_sort |
decentralised facility-based training as an alternative model for slmta implementation: the cameroon experience |
publisher |
AOSIS |
series |
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine |
issn |
2225-2002 2225-2010 |
publishDate |
2014-11-01 |
description |
Background:The Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation (SLMTA) programme is designed to build institutional capacity to help strengthen the tiered laboratorysystem. Most countries implement the SLMTA three-workshop series using a centralised model, whereby participants from several laboratories travel to one location to be trained together.
Objectives: We assessed the effectiveness and cost of conducting SLMTA training in adecentralised manner as compared to centralised training.
Methods: SLMTA was implemented in five pilot laboratories in Cameroon between October 2010 and October 2012 by means of a series of workshops, laboratory improvement projects and on-site mentorship. The first workshop was conducted in the traditional centralised approach. The second and third workshops were decentralised, delivered on-site at each of the five enrolled laboratories. Progress was monitored by repeated audits using the Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) checklist.
Results: Audit scores for all laboratories improved steadily through the course of the programme. Median improvement was 11 percentage points after the first (centralised) training and an additional 24 percentage points after the second (decentralised) training. Estimated per-laboratory cost of the two training models was approximately the same at US$21 000. However, in the decentralised model approximately five times as many staff members were trained, although it also required five times the amount of trainer time.
Conclusion: Decentralised SLMTA training was effective in improving laboratory qualityand should be considered as an alternative to centralised training. |
url |
https://ajlmonline.org/index.php/ajlm/article/view/231 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT julianandasi decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience AT lauradimite decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience AT victormbome decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience AT charlesawasom decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience AT elivengale decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience AT sidneyakuro decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience AT ewaneleonard decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience AT omotayobolu decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience AT terrenceasong decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience AT patricknjukeng decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience AT judithshang decentralisedfacilitybasedtrainingasanalternativemodelforslmtaimplementationthecameroonexperience |
_version_ |
1725406689070415872 |