Degradation Mechanisms for GaN and GaAs High Speed Transistors

We present a review of reliability issues in AlGaN/GaN and AlGaAs/GaAs high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) as well as Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors (HBTs) in the AlGaAs/GaAs materials systems. Because of the complex nature and multi-faceted operation modes of these devices, reliability s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fan Ren, Brent P. Gila, Chien-Fong Lo, Lu Liu, Erica A. Douglas, David J. Cheney, Stephen J. Pearton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2012-11-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
HBT
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/5/12/2498
id doaj-80a455a013b941feb03f4db493996d2d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-80a455a013b941feb03f4db493996d2d2020-11-24T21:26:12ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442012-11-015122498252010.3390/ma5122498Degradation Mechanisms for GaN and GaAs High Speed TransistorsFan RenBrent P. GilaChien-Fong LoLu LiuErica A. DouglasDavid J. CheneyStephen J. PeartonWe present a review of reliability issues in AlGaN/GaN and AlGaAs/GaAs high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) as well as Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors (HBTs) in the AlGaAs/GaAs materials systems. Because of the complex nature and multi-faceted operation modes of these devices, reliability studies must go beyond the typical Arrhenius accelerated life tests. We review the electric field driven degradation in devices with different gate metallization, device dimensions, electric field mitigation techniques (such as source field plate), and the effect of device fabrication processes for both DC and RF stress conditions. We summarize the degradation mechanisms that limit the lifetime of these devices. A variety of contact and surface degradation mechanisms have been reported, but differ in the two device technologies: For HEMTs, the layers are thin and relatively lightly doped compared to HBT structures and there is a metal Schottky gate that is directly on the semiconductor. By contrast, the HBT relies on pn junctions for current modulation and has only Ohmic contacts. This leads to different degradation mechanisms for the two types of devices.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/5/12/2498degradationstressagingHBTHEMT
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fan Ren
Brent P. Gila
Chien-Fong Lo
Lu Liu
Erica A. Douglas
David J. Cheney
Stephen J. Pearton
spellingShingle Fan Ren
Brent P. Gila
Chien-Fong Lo
Lu Liu
Erica A. Douglas
David J. Cheney
Stephen J. Pearton
Degradation Mechanisms for GaN and GaAs High Speed Transistors
Materials
degradation
stress
aging
HBT
HEMT
author_facet Fan Ren
Brent P. Gila
Chien-Fong Lo
Lu Liu
Erica A. Douglas
David J. Cheney
Stephen J. Pearton
author_sort Fan Ren
title Degradation Mechanisms for GaN and GaAs High Speed Transistors
title_short Degradation Mechanisms for GaN and GaAs High Speed Transistors
title_full Degradation Mechanisms for GaN and GaAs High Speed Transistors
title_fullStr Degradation Mechanisms for GaN and GaAs High Speed Transistors
title_full_unstemmed Degradation Mechanisms for GaN and GaAs High Speed Transistors
title_sort degradation mechanisms for gan and gaas high speed transistors
publisher MDPI AG
series Materials
issn 1996-1944
publishDate 2012-11-01
description We present a review of reliability issues in AlGaN/GaN and AlGaAs/GaAs high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) as well as Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors (HBTs) in the AlGaAs/GaAs materials systems. Because of the complex nature and multi-faceted operation modes of these devices, reliability studies must go beyond the typical Arrhenius accelerated life tests. We review the electric field driven degradation in devices with different gate metallization, device dimensions, electric field mitigation techniques (such as source field plate), and the effect of device fabrication processes for both DC and RF stress conditions. We summarize the degradation mechanisms that limit the lifetime of these devices. A variety of contact and surface degradation mechanisms have been reported, but differ in the two device technologies: For HEMTs, the layers are thin and relatively lightly doped compared to HBT structures and there is a metal Schottky gate that is directly on the semiconductor. By contrast, the HBT relies on pn junctions for current modulation and has only Ohmic contacts. This leads to different degradation mechanisms for the two types of devices.
topic degradation
stress
aging
HBT
HEMT
url http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/5/12/2498
work_keys_str_mv AT fanren degradationmechanismsforganandgaashighspeedtransistors
AT brentpgila degradationmechanismsforganandgaashighspeedtransistors
AT chienfonglo degradationmechanismsforganandgaashighspeedtransistors
AT luliu degradationmechanismsforganandgaashighspeedtransistors
AT ericaadouglas degradationmechanismsforganandgaashighspeedtransistors
AT davidjcheney degradationmechanismsforganandgaashighspeedtransistors
AT stephenjpearton degradationmechanismsforganandgaashighspeedtransistors
_version_ 1725980444469493760