Degradation Mechanisms for GaN and GaAs High Speed Transistors
We present a review of reliability issues in AlGaN/GaN and AlGaAs/GaAs high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) as well as Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors (HBTs) in the AlGaAs/GaAs materials systems. Because of the complex nature and multi-faceted operation modes of these devices, reliability s...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2012-11-01
|
Series: | Materials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/5/12/2498 |
id |
doaj-80a455a013b941feb03f4db493996d2d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-80a455a013b941feb03f4db493996d2d2020-11-24T21:26:12ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442012-11-015122498252010.3390/ma5122498Degradation Mechanisms for GaN and GaAs High Speed TransistorsFan RenBrent P. GilaChien-Fong LoLu LiuErica A. DouglasDavid J. CheneyStephen J. PeartonWe present a review of reliability issues in AlGaN/GaN and AlGaAs/GaAs high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) as well as Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors (HBTs) in the AlGaAs/GaAs materials systems. Because of the complex nature and multi-faceted operation modes of these devices, reliability studies must go beyond the typical Arrhenius accelerated life tests. We review the electric field driven degradation in devices with different gate metallization, device dimensions, electric field mitigation techniques (such as source field plate), and the effect of device fabrication processes for both DC and RF stress conditions. We summarize the degradation mechanisms that limit the lifetime of these devices. A variety of contact and surface degradation mechanisms have been reported, but differ in the two device technologies: For HEMTs, the layers are thin and relatively lightly doped compared to HBT structures and there is a metal Schottky gate that is directly on the semiconductor. By contrast, the HBT relies on pn junctions for current modulation and has only Ohmic contacts. This leads to different degradation mechanisms for the two types of devices.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/5/12/2498degradationstressagingHBTHEMT |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fan Ren Brent P. Gila Chien-Fong Lo Lu Liu Erica A. Douglas David J. Cheney Stephen J. Pearton |
spellingShingle |
Fan Ren Brent P. Gila Chien-Fong Lo Lu Liu Erica A. Douglas David J. Cheney Stephen J. Pearton Degradation Mechanisms for GaN and GaAs High Speed Transistors Materials degradation stress aging HBT HEMT |
author_facet |
Fan Ren Brent P. Gila Chien-Fong Lo Lu Liu Erica A. Douglas David J. Cheney Stephen J. Pearton |
author_sort |
Fan Ren |
title |
Degradation Mechanisms for GaN and GaAs High Speed Transistors |
title_short |
Degradation Mechanisms for GaN and GaAs High Speed Transistors |
title_full |
Degradation Mechanisms for GaN and GaAs High Speed Transistors |
title_fullStr |
Degradation Mechanisms for GaN and GaAs High Speed Transistors |
title_full_unstemmed |
Degradation Mechanisms for GaN and GaAs High Speed Transistors |
title_sort |
degradation mechanisms for gan and gaas high speed transistors |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Materials |
issn |
1996-1944 |
publishDate |
2012-11-01 |
description |
We present a review of reliability issues in AlGaN/GaN and AlGaAs/GaAs high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) as well as Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors (HBTs) in the AlGaAs/GaAs materials systems. Because of the complex nature and multi-faceted operation modes of these devices, reliability studies must go beyond the typical Arrhenius accelerated life tests. We review the electric field driven degradation in devices with different gate metallization, device dimensions, electric field mitigation techniques (such as source field plate), and the effect of device fabrication processes for both DC and RF stress conditions. We summarize the degradation mechanisms that limit the lifetime of these devices. A variety of contact and surface degradation mechanisms have been reported, but differ in the two device technologies: For HEMTs, the layers are thin and relatively lightly doped compared to HBT structures and there is a metal Schottky gate that is directly on the semiconductor. By contrast, the HBT relies on pn junctions for current modulation and has only Ohmic contacts. This leads to different degradation mechanisms for the two types of devices. |
topic |
degradation stress aging HBT HEMT |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/5/12/2498 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fanren degradationmechanismsforganandgaashighspeedtransistors AT brentpgila degradationmechanismsforganandgaashighspeedtransistors AT chienfonglo degradationmechanismsforganandgaashighspeedtransistors AT luliu degradationmechanismsforganandgaashighspeedtransistors AT ericaadouglas degradationmechanismsforganandgaashighspeedtransistors AT davidjcheney degradationmechanismsforganandgaashighspeedtransistors AT stephenjpearton degradationmechanismsforganandgaashighspeedtransistors |
_version_ |
1725980444469493760 |