Measures Matter—Determining the True Nutri-Physiological Value of Feed Ingredients for Swine

Many types of feed ingredients are used to provide energy and nutrients to meet the nutritional requirements of swine. However, the analytical methods and measures used to determine the true nutritional and physiological (“nutri-physiological”) value of feed ingredients affect the accuracy of predic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gerald C. Shurson, Yuan-Tai Hung, Jae Cheol Jang, Pedro E. Urriola
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/5/1259
id doaj-809db949896547c19213eb0a23fbf06d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-809db949896547c19213eb0a23fbf06d2021-04-27T23:04:51ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152021-04-01111259125910.3390/ani11051259Measures Matter—Determining the True Nutri-Physiological Value of Feed Ingredients for SwineGerald C. Shurson0Yuan-Tai Hung1Jae Cheol Jang2Pedro E. Urriola3Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USADepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USADepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USADepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USAMany types of feed ingredients are used to provide energy and nutrients to meet the nutritional requirements of swine. However, the analytical methods and measures used to determine the true nutritional and physiological (“nutri-physiological”) value of feed ingredients affect the accuracy of predicting and achieving desired animal responses. Some chemical characteristics of feed ingredients are detrimental to pig health and performance, while functional components in other ingredients provide beneficial health effects beyond their nutritional value when included in complete swine diets. Traditional analytical procedures and measures are useful for determining energy and nutrient digestibility of feed ingredients, but do not adequately assess their true physiological or biological value. Prediction equations, along with ex vivo and in vitro methods, provide some benefits for assessing the nutri-physiological value of feed ingredients compared with in vivo determinations, but they also have some limitations. Determining the digestion kinetics of the different chemical components of feed ingredients, understanding how circadian rhythms affect feeding behavior and the gastrointestinal microbiome of pigs, and accounting for the functional properties of many feed ingredients in diet formulation are the emerging innovations that will facilitate improvements in precision swine nutrition and environmental sustainability in global pork-production systems.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/5/1259amino acidsdietary fiberdigestion kineticsfunctional ingredientsin vitro digestibilitylipids
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gerald C. Shurson
Yuan-Tai Hung
Jae Cheol Jang
Pedro E. Urriola
spellingShingle Gerald C. Shurson
Yuan-Tai Hung
Jae Cheol Jang
Pedro E. Urriola
Measures Matter—Determining the True Nutri-Physiological Value of Feed Ingredients for Swine
Animals
amino acids
dietary fiber
digestion kinetics
functional ingredients
in vitro digestibility
lipids
author_facet Gerald C. Shurson
Yuan-Tai Hung
Jae Cheol Jang
Pedro E. Urriola
author_sort Gerald C. Shurson
title Measures Matter—Determining the True Nutri-Physiological Value of Feed Ingredients for Swine
title_short Measures Matter—Determining the True Nutri-Physiological Value of Feed Ingredients for Swine
title_full Measures Matter—Determining the True Nutri-Physiological Value of Feed Ingredients for Swine
title_fullStr Measures Matter—Determining the True Nutri-Physiological Value of Feed Ingredients for Swine
title_full_unstemmed Measures Matter—Determining the True Nutri-Physiological Value of Feed Ingredients for Swine
title_sort measures matter—determining the true nutri-physiological value of feed ingredients for swine
publisher MDPI AG
series Animals
issn 2076-2615
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Many types of feed ingredients are used to provide energy and nutrients to meet the nutritional requirements of swine. However, the analytical methods and measures used to determine the true nutritional and physiological (“nutri-physiological”) value of feed ingredients affect the accuracy of predicting and achieving desired animal responses. Some chemical characteristics of feed ingredients are detrimental to pig health and performance, while functional components in other ingredients provide beneficial health effects beyond their nutritional value when included in complete swine diets. Traditional analytical procedures and measures are useful for determining energy and nutrient digestibility of feed ingredients, but do not adequately assess their true physiological or biological value. Prediction equations, along with ex vivo and in vitro methods, provide some benefits for assessing the nutri-physiological value of feed ingredients compared with in vivo determinations, but they also have some limitations. Determining the digestion kinetics of the different chemical components of feed ingredients, understanding how circadian rhythms affect feeding behavior and the gastrointestinal microbiome of pigs, and accounting for the functional properties of many feed ingredients in diet formulation are the emerging innovations that will facilitate improvements in precision swine nutrition and environmental sustainability in global pork-production systems.
topic amino acids
dietary fiber
digestion kinetics
functional ingredients
in vitro digestibility
lipids
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/5/1259
work_keys_str_mv AT geraldcshurson measuresmatterdeterminingthetruenutriphysiologicalvalueoffeedingredientsforswine
AT yuantaihung measuresmatterdeterminingthetruenutriphysiologicalvalueoffeedingredientsforswine
AT jaecheoljang measuresmatterdeterminingthetruenutriphysiologicalvalueoffeedingredientsforswine
AT pedroeurriola measuresmatterdeterminingthetruenutriphysiologicalvalueoffeedingredientsforswine
_version_ 1721505324713639936