Rating Scale Measures in Multiple-Choice Exams: Pilot Studies in Pharmacology
Multiple-choice questions are widely used in clinical education. Usually, the students have to mark the one and only correct answer from a set of five alternatives. Here, in a voluntary exam, at the end of an obligatory pharmacology exam, we tested a format where more than one alternative could be c...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Education Research International |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8615746 |
id |
doaj-808dd1e63d0049f79d5236d32e37db3b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-808dd1e63d0049f79d5236d32e37db3b2020-11-24T23:15:07ZengHindawi LimitedEducation Research International2090-40022090-40102018-01-01201810.1155/2018/86157468615746Rating Scale Measures in Multiple-Choice Exams: Pilot Studies in PharmacologyAndreas Melzer0Ulrich Gergs1Josef Lukas2Joachim Neumann3Institute of Psychology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06097 Halle, GermanyInstitute for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06097 Halle, GermanyInstitute of Psychology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06097 Halle, GermanyInstitute for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06097 Halle, GermanyMultiple-choice questions are widely used in clinical education. Usually, the students have to mark the one and only correct answer from a set of five alternatives. Here, in a voluntary exam, at the end of an obligatory pharmacology exam, we tested a format where more than one alternative could be correct (N=544 students from three year groups). Moreover, the students were asked to rate each item. The students were unaware how many correct answers were contained in the questions. Finally, a questionnaire had to be filled out about the difficulty of the new tests compared to the one out of five tests. In the obligatory final exam, all groups performed similarly. From the results, we conclude that the new rating scales were a better challenge and could be adapted to assess student knowledge and confidence in more depth than previous multiple-choice questions.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8615746 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andreas Melzer Ulrich Gergs Josef Lukas Joachim Neumann |
spellingShingle |
Andreas Melzer Ulrich Gergs Josef Lukas Joachim Neumann Rating Scale Measures in Multiple-Choice Exams: Pilot Studies in Pharmacology Education Research International |
author_facet |
Andreas Melzer Ulrich Gergs Josef Lukas Joachim Neumann |
author_sort |
Andreas Melzer |
title |
Rating Scale Measures in Multiple-Choice Exams: Pilot Studies in Pharmacology |
title_short |
Rating Scale Measures in Multiple-Choice Exams: Pilot Studies in Pharmacology |
title_full |
Rating Scale Measures in Multiple-Choice Exams: Pilot Studies in Pharmacology |
title_fullStr |
Rating Scale Measures in Multiple-Choice Exams: Pilot Studies in Pharmacology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rating Scale Measures in Multiple-Choice Exams: Pilot Studies in Pharmacology |
title_sort |
rating scale measures in multiple-choice exams: pilot studies in pharmacology |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Education Research International |
issn |
2090-4002 2090-4010 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Multiple-choice questions are widely used in clinical education. Usually, the students have to mark the one and only correct answer from a set of five alternatives. Here, in a voluntary exam, at the end of an obligatory pharmacology exam, we tested a format where more than one alternative could be correct (N=544 students from three year groups). Moreover, the students were asked to rate each item. The students were unaware how many correct answers were contained in the questions. Finally, a questionnaire had to be filled out about the difficulty of the new tests compared to the one out of five tests. In the obligatory final exam, all groups performed similarly. From the results, we conclude that the new rating scales were a better challenge and could be adapted to assess student knowledge and confidence in more depth than previous multiple-choice questions. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8615746 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andreasmelzer ratingscalemeasuresinmultiplechoiceexamspilotstudiesinpharmacology AT ulrichgergs ratingscalemeasuresinmultiplechoiceexamspilotstudiesinpharmacology AT joseflukas ratingscalemeasuresinmultiplechoiceexamspilotstudiesinpharmacology AT joachimneumann ratingscalemeasuresinmultiplechoiceexamspilotstudiesinpharmacology |
_version_ |
1725592036764024832 |