Rating Scale Measures in Multiple-Choice Exams: Pilot Studies in Pharmacology

Multiple-choice questions are widely used in clinical education. Usually, the students have to mark the one and only correct answer from a set of five alternatives. Here, in a voluntary exam, at the end of an obligatory pharmacology exam, we tested a format where more than one alternative could be c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas Melzer, Ulrich Gergs, Josef Lukas, Joachim Neumann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:Education Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8615746
id doaj-808dd1e63d0049f79d5236d32e37db3b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-808dd1e63d0049f79d5236d32e37db3b2020-11-24T23:15:07ZengHindawi LimitedEducation Research International2090-40022090-40102018-01-01201810.1155/2018/86157468615746Rating Scale Measures in Multiple-Choice Exams: Pilot Studies in PharmacologyAndreas Melzer0Ulrich Gergs1Josef Lukas2Joachim Neumann3Institute of Psychology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06097 Halle, GermanyInstitute for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06097 Halle, GermanyInstitute of Psychology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06097 Halle, GermanyInstitute for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06097 Halle, GermanyMultiple-choice questions are widely used in clinical education. Usually, the students have to mark the one and only correct answer from a set of five alternatives. Here, in a voluntary exam, at the end of an obligatory pharmacology exam, we tested a format where more than one alternative could be correct (N=544 students from three year groups). Moreover, the students were asked to rate each item. The students were unaware how many correct answers were contained in the questions. Finally, a questionnaire had to be filled out about the difficulty of the new tests compared to the one out of five tests. In the obligatory final exam, all groups performed similarly. From the results, we conclude that the new rating scales were a better challenge and could be adapted to assess student knowledge and confidence in more depth than previous multiple-choice questions.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8615746
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andreas Melzer
Ulrich Gergs
Josef Lukas
Joachim Neumann
spellingShingle Andreas Melzer
Ulrich Gergs
Josef Lukas
Joachim Neumann
Rating Scale Measures in Multiple-Choice Exams: Pilot Studies in Pharmacology
Education Research International
author_facet Andreas Melzer
Ulrich Gergs
Josef Lukas
Joachim Neumann
author_sort Andreas Melzer
title Rating Scale Measures in Multiple-Choice Exams: Pilot Studies in Pharmacology
title_short Rating Scale Measures in Multiple-Choice Exams: Pilot Studies in Pharmacology
title_full Rating Scale Measures in Multiple-Choice Exams: Pilot Studies in Pharmacology
title_fullStr Rating Scale Measures in Multiple-Choice Exams: Pilot Studies in Pharmacology
title_full_unstemmed Rating Scale Measures in Multiple-Choice Exams: Pilot Studies in Pharmacology
title_sort rating scale measures in multiple-choice exams: pilot studies in pharmacology
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Education Research International
issn 2090-4002
2090-4010
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Multiple-choice questions are widely used in clinical education. Usually, the students have to mark the one and only correct answer from a set of five alternatives. Here, in a voluntary exam, at the end of an obligatory pharmacology exam, we tested a format where more than one alternative could be correct (N=544 students from three year groups). Moreover, the students were asked to rate each item. The students were unaware how many correct answers were contained in the questions. Finally, a questionnaire had to be filled out about the difficulty of the new tests compared to the one out of five tests. In the obligatory final exam, all groups performed similarly. From the results, we conclude that the new rating scales were a better challenge and could be adapted to assess student knowledge and confidence in more depth than previous multiple-choice questions.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8615746
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasmelzer ratingscalemeasuresinmultiplechoiceexamspilotstudiesinpharmacology
AT ulrichgergs ratingscalemeasuresinmultiplechoiceexamspilotstudiesinpharmacology
AT joseflukas ratingscalemeasuresinmultiplechoiceexamspilotstudiesinpharmacology
AT joachimneumann ratingscalemeasuresinmultiplechoiceexamspilotstudiesinpharmacology
_version_ 1725592036764024832