Why do people spend money to help vulnerable people?

Prosocial spending has been linked to positive benefits for individuals and societies. However, little is known about the precursors of prosocial spending directed to vulnerable people. We experimentally tested the effect of a first exposure to a prosocial donation decision on subsequent prosocial s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luminița Pătraș, Vicente Martínez-Tur, Esther Gracia, Carolina Moliner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213582
id doaj-807ec5facef44851a78f0b66458d2b20
record_format Article
spelling doaj-807ec5facef44851a78f0b66458d2b202021-03-03T20:48:52ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01143e021358210.1371/journal.pone.0213582Why do people spend money to help vulnerable people?Luminița PătrașVicente Martínez-TurEsther GraciaCarolina MolinerProsocial spending has been linked to positive benefits for individuals and societies. However, little is known about the precursors of prosocial spending directed to vulnerable people. We experimentally tested the effect of a first exposure to a prosocial donation decision on subsequent prosocial spending. We also examined the direct links from eudaimonic well-being beliefs (contribution-to-others and self-development) to prosocial spending, as well as the interaction between these beliefs and autonomy in predicting the money given. A total of 200 individuals participated in the study. Results showed that, compared to two control groups ("totally self-focused" and "no first-exposure"), an initial exposure to a prosocial donation decision increases subsequent prosocial spending. In addition, we observed an anchoring bias from the initial prosocial donation to subsequent prosocial spending. Regression analyses also confirmed the existence of a positive significant relationship between contribution-to-others beliefs and prosocial spending. Finally, we observed a significant interaction between autonomy and self-development well-being beliefs, such that autonomy strengthens the link from self-development beliefs to prosocial spending. In general, our results confirmed the significant role of exposure, anchoring, autonomy, and well-being beliefs in predicting the money spent to help vulnerable people.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213582
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Luminița Pătraș
Vicente Martínez-Tur
Esther Gracia
Carolina Moliner
spellingShingle Luminița Pătraș
Vicente Martínez-Tur
Esther Gracia
Carolina Moliner
Why do people spend money to help vulnerable people?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Luminița Pătraș
Vicente Martínez-Tur
Esther Gracia
Carolina Moliner
author_sort Luminița Pătraș
title Why do people spend money to help vulnerable people?
title_short Why do people spend money to help vulnerable people?
title_full Why do people spend money to help vulnerable people?
title_fullStr Why do people spend money to help vulnerable people?
title_full_unstemmed Why do people spend money to help vulnerable people?
title_sort why do people spend money to help vulnerable people?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Prosocial spending has been linked to positive benefits for individuals and societies. However, little is known about the precursors of prosocial spending directed to vulnerable people. We experimentally tested the effect of a first exposure to a prosocial donation decision on subsequent prosocial spending. We also examined the direct links from eudaimonic well-being beliefs (contribution-to-others and self-development) to prosocial spending, as well as the interaction between these beliefs and autonomy in predicting the money given. A total of 200 individuals participated in the study. Results showed that, compared to two control groups ("totally self-focused" and "no first-exposure"), an initial exposure to a prosocial donation decision increases subsequent prosocial spending. In addition, we observed an anchoring bias from the initial prosocial donation to subsequent prosocial spending. Regression analyses also confirmed the existence of a positive significant relationship between contribution-to-others beliefs and prosocial spending. Finally, we observed a significant interaction between autonomy and self-development well-being beliefs, such that autonomy strengthens the link from self-development beliefs to prosocial spending. In general, our results confirmed the significant role of exposure, anchoring, autonomy, and well-being beliefs in predicting the money spent to help vulnerable people.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213582
work_keys_str_mv AT luminitapatras whydopeoplespendmoneytohelpvulnerablepeople
AT vicentemartineztur whydopeoplespendmoneytohelpvulnerablepeople
AT esthergracia whydopeoplespendmoneytohelpvulnerablepeople
AT carolinamoliner whydopeoplespendmoneytohelpvulnerablepeople
_version_ 1714820383951028224