The Discovery of the Venetian Blind Effect: A Translation of Münster (1941)

Münster, the first to discover the effects of a luminance disparity on perceived depth, described two: (1) The apparent displacement in depth of one of a pair of objects relative to the other when viewed with a luminance disparity, and (2) The apparent overall displacement of objects viewed with a l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edward T. Larkin, Wm Wren Stine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-07-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517715475
id doaj-8069a980550c462bb6026d6a986cd5fd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8069a980550c462bb6026d6a986cd5fd2020-11-25T03:16:32ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952017-07-01810.1177/2041669517715475The Discovery of the Venetian Blind Effect: A Translation of Münster (1941)Edward T. LarkinWm Wren StineMünster, the first to discover the effects of a luminance disparity on perceived depth, described two: (1) The apparent displacement in depth of one of a pair of objects relative to the other when viewed with a luminance disparity, and (2) The apparent overall displacement of objects viewed with a luminance disparity away from the observer. The first, which is the Venetian blind effect, was ascribed to irradiation. Current evidence suggests that irradiation fails to account for the effect, implying that neural mechanisms are involved. The second was thought to be related to the perceived distance of a monocularly viewed stimulus embedded in a dichoptically viewed stimulus. However, the measured effect was probably due to aniseikonia. Münster offered a compelling and seemingly complete account of the Venetian blind effect using irradiation theory. Münster’s irradiation theory effectively inhibited further research by relegating the perceived depth displacement to largely non-neural mechanisms. It is now becoming clear that Münster’s measurement of the Venetian blind effect represents the discovery of one of several mechanisms supporting stereopsis, though he and many others failed to recognize that discovery at the time.https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517715475
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Edward T. Larkin
Wm Wren Stine
spellingShingle Edward T. Larkin
Wm Wren Stine
The Discovery of the Venetian Blind Effect: A Translation of Münster (1941)
i-Perception
author_facet Edward T. Larkin
Wm Wren Stine
author_sort Edward T. Larkin
title The Discovery of the Venetian Blind Effect: A Translation of Münster (1941)
title_short The Discovery of the Venetian Blind Effect: A Translation of Münster (1941)
title_full The Discovery of the Venetian Blind Effect: A Translation of Münster (1941)
title_fullStr The Discovery of the Venetian Blind Effect: A Translation of Münster (1941)
title_full_unstemmed The Discovery of the Venetian Blind Effect: A Translation of Münster (1941)
title_sort discovery of the venetian blind effect: a translation of münster (1941)
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Münster, the first to discover the effects of a luminance disparity on perceived depth, described two: (1) The apparent displacement in depth of one of a pair of objects relative to the other when viewed with a luminance disparity, and (2) The apparent overall displacement of objects viewed with a luminance disparity away from the observer. The first, which is the Venetian blind effect, was ascribed to irradiation. Current evidence suggests that irradiation fails to account for the effect, implying that neural mechanisms are involved. The second was thought to be related to the perceived distance of a monocularly viewed stimulus embedded in a dichoptically viewed stimulus. However, the measured effect was probably due to aniseikonia. Münster offered a compelling and seemingly complete account of the Venetian blind effect using irradiation theory. Münster’s irradiation theory effectively inhibited further research by relegating the perceived depth displacement to largely non-neural mechanisms. It is now becoming clear that Münster’s measurement of the Venetian blind effect represents the discovery of one of several mechanisms supporting stereopsis, though he and many others failed to recognize that discovery at the time.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517715475
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardtlarkin thediscoveryofthevenetianblindeffectatranslationofmunster1941
AT wmwrenstine thediscoveryofthevenetianblindeffectatranslationofmunster1941
AT edwardtlarkin discoveryofthevenetianblindeffectatranslationofmunster1941
AT wmwrenstine discoveryofthevenetianblindeffectatranslationofmunster1941
_version_ 1724635600163700736