A Belgian View of (the Debate on) ‘Dat nooit meer’ – ‘Never Again’

<p>While the booming field of memory studies is characterised by a lack of uniform and consistent methodology, Dat nooit meer [Never Again] seems to reject any theoretical analysis whatsoever. The author, Chris van der Heijden, relies on the journalistic motto ‘show, don’t tell’. Such a vision...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Koen Aerts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Journals 2013-06-01
Series:BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.bmgn-lchr.nl/articles/8550
id doaj-8043d1277190467da2b29be8e2320002
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8043d1277190467da2b29be8e23200022021-10-02T04:24:25ZengOpen JournalsBMGN: Low Countries Historical Review0165-05052211-28982013-06-011282818910.18352/bmgn-lchr.85508406A Belgian View of (the Debate on) ‘Dat nooit meer’ – ‘Never Again’Koen Aerts0Royal Netherlands Historical Society (editorial secretary)<p>While the booming field of memory studies is characterised by a lack of uniform and consistent methodology, Dat nooit meer [Never Again] seems to reject any theoretical analysis whatsoever. The author, Chris van der Heijden, relies on the journalistic motto ‘show, don’t tell’. Such a vision provides both the strength and the weakness of the argument. On the one hand he manages to dig up a wealth of empirical information; on the other hand, the evidence of his thesis is solely dependent on the selection of sources by the author.</p><p> </p><p>This book therefore is not only a challenge for Dutch war historiography, but also indirectly an urgent call for self-reflection on the international research on collective memories. To what extent is its associative and anecdotal argument a relevant interpretation of how Dutch society remembered and rewrote the past World War II? To what extent can we develop an epistemologically justified and adequate methodology that allows the analysis of the genesis of a collective memory?</p><p> </p><p>This review is part of the <a href="/501/volume/128/issue/2/">discussion forum</a> 'Dat nooit meer' (Chris van der Heijden).</p>https://www.bmgn-lchr.nl/articles/8550Second World Warhistoriographymemoryjewsholocaustresistance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Koen Aerts
spellingShingle Koen Aerts
A Belgian View of (the Debate on) ‘Dat nooit meer’ – ‘Never Again’
BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
Second World War
historiography
memory
jews
holocaust
resistance
author_facet Koen Aerts
author_sort Koen Aerts
title A Belgian View of (the Debate on) ‘Dat nooit meer’ – ‘Never Again’
title_short A Belgian View of (the Debate on) ‘Dat nooit meer’ – ‘Never Again’
title_full A Belgian View of (the Debate on) ‘Dat nooit meer’ – ‘Never Again’
title_fullStr A Belgian View of (the Debate on) ‘Dat nooit meer’ – ‘Never Again’
title_full_unstemmed A Belgian View of (the Debate on) ‘Dat nooit meer’ – ‘Never Again’
title_sort belgian view of (the debate on) ‘dat nooit meer’ – ‘never again’
publisher Open Journals
series BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
issn 0165-0505
2211-2898
publishDate 2013-06-01
description <p>While the booming field of memory studies is characterised by a lack of uniform and consistent methodology, Dat nooit meer [Never Again] seems to reject any theoretical analysis whatsoever. The author, Chris van der Heijden, relies on the journalistic motto ‘show, don’t tell’. Such a vision provides both the strength and the weakness of the argument. On the one hand he manages to dig up a wealth of empirical information; on the other hand, the evidence of his thesis is solely dependent on the selection of sources by the author.</p><p> </p><p>This book therefore is not only a challenge for Dutch war historiography, but also indirectly an urgent call for self-reflection on the international research on collective memories. To what extent is its associative and anecdotal argument a relevant interpretation of how Dutch society remembered and rewrote the past World War II? To what extent can we develop an epistemologically justified and adequate methodology that allows the analysis of the genesis of a collective memory?</p><p> </p><p>This review is part of the <a href="/501/volume/128/issue/2/">discussion forum</a> 'Dat nooit meer' (Chris van der Heijden).</p>
topic Second World War
historiography
memory
jews
holocaust
resistance
url https://www.bmgn-lchr.nl/articles/8550
work_keys_str_mv AT koenaerts abelgianviewofthedebateondatnooitmeerneveragain
AT koenaerts belgianviewofthedebateondatnooitmeerneveragain
_version_ 1716859152493445120