Connecting network properties of rapidly disseminating epizoonotics.

To effectively control the geographical dissemination of infectious diseases, their properties need to be determined. To test that rapid microbial dispersal requires not only susceptible hosts but also a pre-existing, connecting network, we explored constructs meant to reveal the network properties...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ariel L Rivas, Folorunso O Fasina, Almira L Hoogesteyn, Steven N Konah, José L Febles, Douglas J Perkins, James M Hyman, Jeanne M Fair, James B Hittner, Steven D Smith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3382573?pdf=render
id doaj-803fbcf34fb141d282dd431f3ab0a016
record_format Article
spelling doaj-803fbcf34fb141d282dd431f3ab0a0162020-11-25T02:32:13ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0176e3977810.1371/journal.pone.0039778Connecting network properties of rapidly disseminating epizoonotics.Ariel L RivasFolorunso O FasinaAlmira L HoogesteynSteven N KonahJosé L FeblesDouglas J PerkinsJames M HymanJeanne M FairJames B HittnerSteven D SmithTo effectively control the geographical dissemination of infectious diseases, their properties need to be determined. To test that rapid microbial dispersal requires not only susceptible hosts but also a pre-existing, connecting network, we explored constructs meant to reveal the network properties associated with disease spread, which included the road structure.Using geo-temporal data collected from epizoonotics in which all hosts were susceptible (mammals infected by Foot-and-mouth disease virus, Uruguay, 2001; birds infected by Avian Influenza virus H5N1, Nigeria, 2006), two models were compared: 1) 'connectivity', a model that integrated bio-physical concepts (the agent's transmission cycle, road topology) into indicators designed to measure networks ('nodes' or infected sites with short- and long-range links), and 2) 'contacts', which focused on infected individuals but did not assess connectivity.THE CONNECTIVITY MODEL SHOWED FIVE NETWORK PROPERTIES: 1) spatial aggregation of cases (disease clusters), 2) links among similar 'nodes' (assortativity), 3) simultaneous activation of similar nodes (synchronicity), 4) disease flows moving from highly to poorly connected nodes (directionality), and 5) a few nodes accounting for most cases (a "20:80" pattern). In both epizoonotics, 1) not all primary cases were connected but at least one primary case was connected, 2) highly connected, small areas (nodes) accounted for most cases, 3) several classes of nodes were distinguished, and 4) the contact model, which assumed all primary cases were identical, captured half the number of cases identified by the connectivity model. When assessed together, the synchronicity and directionality properties explained when and where an infectious disease spreads.Geo-temporal constructs of Network Theory's nodes and links were retrospectively validated in rapidly disseminating infectious diseases. They distinguished classes of cases, nodes, and networks, generating information usable to revise theory and optimize control measures. Prospective studies that consider pre-outbreak predictors, such as connecting networks, are recommended.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3382573?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ariel L Rivas
Folorunso O Fasina
Almira L Hoogesteyn
Steven N Konah
José L Febles
Douglas J Perkins
James M Hyman
Jeanne M Fair
James B Hittner
Steven D Smith
spellingShingle Ariel L Rivas
Folorunso O Fasina
Almira L Hoogesteyn
Steven N Konah
José L Febles
Douglas J Perkins
James M Hyman
Jeanne M Fair
James B Hittner
Steven D Smith
Connecting network properties of rapidly disseminating epizoonotics.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ariel L Rivas
Folorunso O Fasina
Almira L Hoogesteyn
Steven N Konah
José L Febles
Douglas J Perkins
James M Hyman
Jeanne M Fair
James B Hittner
Steven D Smith
author_sort Ariel L Rivas
title Connecting network properties of rapidly disseminating epizoonotics.
title_short Connecting network properties of rapidly disseminating epizoonotics.
title_full Connecting network properties of rapidly disseminating epizoonotics.
title_fullStr Connecting network properties of rapidly disseminating epizoonotics.
title_full_unstemmed Connecting network properties of rapidly disseminating epizoonotics.
title_sort connecting network properties of rapidly disseminating epizoonotics.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description To effectively control the geographical dissemination of infectious diseases, their properties need to be determined. To test that rapid microbial dispersal requires not only susceptible hosts but also a pre-existing, connecting network, we explored constructs meant to reveal the network properties associated with disease spread, which included the road structure.Using geo-temporal data collected from epizoonotics in which all hosts were susceptible (mammals infected by Foot-and-mouth disease virus, Uruguay, 2001; birds infected by Avian Influenza virus H5N1, Nigeria, 2006), two models were compared: 1) 'connectivity', a model that integrated bio-physical concepts (the agent's transmission cycle, road topology) into indicators designed to measure networks ('nodes' or infected sites with short- and long-range links), and 2) 'contacts', which focused on infected individuals but did not assess connectivity.THE CONNECTIVITY MODEL SHOWED FIVE NETWORK PROPERTIES: 1) spatial aggregation of cases (disease clusters), 2) links among similar 'nodes' (assortativity), 3) simultaneous activation of similar nodes (synchronicity), 4) disease flows moving from highly to poorly connected nodes (directionality), and 5) a few nodes accounting for most cases (a "20:80" pattern). In both epizoonotics, 1) not all primary cases were connected but at least one primary case was connected, 2) highly connected, small areas (nodes) accounted for most cases, 3) several classes of nodes were distinguished, and 4) the contact model, which assumed all primary cases were identical, captured half the number of cases identified by the connectivity model. When assessed together, the synchronicity and directionality properties explained when and where an infectious disease spreads.Geo-temporal constructs of Network Theory's nodes and links were retrospectively validated in rapidly disseminating infectious diseases. They distinguished classes of cases, nodes, and networks, generating information usable to revise theory and optimize control measures. Prospective studies that consider pre-outbreak predictors, such as connecting networks, are recommended.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3382573?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ariellrivas connectingnetworkpropertiesofrapidlydisseminatingepizoonotics
AT folorunsoofasina connectingnetworkpropertiesofrapidlydisseminatingepizoonotics
AT almiralhoogesteyn connectingnetworkpropertiesofrapidlydisseminatingepizoonotics
AT stevennkonah connectingnetworkpropertiesofrapidlydisseminatingepizoonotics
AT joselfebles connectingnetworkpropertiesofrapidlydisseminatingepizoonotics
AT douglasjperkins connectingnetworkpropertiesofrapidlydisseminatingepizoonotics
AT jamesmhyman connectingnetworkpropertiesofrapidlydisseminatingepizoonotics
AT jeannemfair connectingnetworkpropertiesofrapidlydisseminatingepizoonotics
AT jamesbhittner connectingnetworkpropertiesofrapidlydisseminatingepizoonotics
AT stevendsmith connectingnetworkpropertiesofrapidlydisseminatingepizoonotics
_version_ 1724820629386952704