Attentional Avoidance for Guilty Knowledge Among Deceptive Individuals

The purpose of the present study is to differentiate between innocent suspects who have knowledge of crime information and guilty suspects. The study investigated eye-movement differences among three groups: a guilty group who took part in a mock crime, an innocent-aware group who did not commit a m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kiho Kim, Go-eun Kim, Jang-Han Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00114/full
id doaj-8037f10169af4359ad923766dfa9575d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8037f10169af4359ad923766dfa9575d2020-11-24T21:33:09ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402019-03-011010.3389/fpsyt.2019.00114418780Attentional Avoidance for Guilty Knowledge Among Deceptive IndividualsKiho KimGo-eun KimJang-Han LeeThe purpose of the present study is to differentiate between innocent suspects who have knowledge of crime information and guilty suspects. The study investigated eye-movement differences among three groups: a guilty group who took part in a mock crime, an innocent-aware group who did not commit a mock crime but were exposed to the crime stimuli, and an innocent-unaware group who neither committed a mock crime nor had crime-relevant information. Each group's eye movements were tracked while all participants viewed stimuli (crime-relevant, crime-irrelevant, and neutral). The results revealed that the guilty group not only viewed all stimuli later than the other groups, they also viewed crime-relevant and crime-irrelevant stimuli for a shorter time period than the innocent-aware group; the innocent-aware group focused their attention on crime-relevant and crime-irrelevant stimuli longer than neutral stimuli, and the innocent-unaware group showed no differences in their attention focus among all types of stimuli. This present study suggests that guilty individuals show attentional avoidance from all stimuli in a lie detection situation, whereas innocent-aware and innocent-unaware individuals did not show avoidance responses.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00114/fullattentional biasattentional avoidancedeception detectionguilty knowledge testconcealed information testeye-movement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kiho Kim
Go-eun Kim
Jang-Han Lee
spellingShingle Kiho Kim
Go-eun Kim
Jang-Han Lee
Attentional Avoidance for Guilty Knowledge Among Deceptive Individuals
Frontiers in Psychiatry
attentional bias
attentional avoidance
deception detection
guilty knowledge test
concealed information test
eye-movement
author_facet Kiho Kim
Go-eun Kim
Jang-Han Lee
author_sort Kiho Kim
title Attentional Avoidance for Guilty Knowledge Among Deceptive Individuals
title_short Attentional Avoidance for Guilty Knowledge Among Deceptive Individuals
title_full Attentional Avoidance for Guilty Knowledge Among Deceptive Individuals
title_fullStr Attentional Avoidance for Guilty Knowledge Among Deceptive Individuals
title_full_unstemmed Attentional Avoidance for Guilty Knowledge Among Deceptive Individuals
title_sort attentional avoidance for guilty knowledge among deceptive individuals
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
issn 1664-0640
publishDate 2019-03-01
description The purpose of the present study is to differentiate between innocent suspects who have knowledge of crime information and guilty suspects. The study investigated eye-movement differences among three groups: a guilty group who took part in a mock crime, an innocent-aware group who did not commit a mock crime but were exposed to the crime stimuli, and an innocent-unaware group who neither committed a mock crime nor had crime-relevant information. Each group's eye movements were tracked while all participants viewed stimuli (crime-relevant, crime-irrelevant, and neutral). The results revealed that the guilty group not only viewed all stimuli later than the other groups, they also viewed crime-relevant and crime-irrelevant stimuli for a shorter time period than the innocent-aware group; the innocent-aware group focused their attention on crime-relevant and crime-irrelevant stimuli longer than neutral stimuli, and the innocent-unaware group showed no differences in their attention focus among all types of stimuli. This present study suggests that guilty individuals show attentional avoidance from all stimuli in a lie detection situation, whereas innocent-aware and innocent-unaware individuals did not show avoidance responses.
topic attentional bias
attentional avoidance
deception detection
guilty knowledge test
concealed information test
eye-movement
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00114/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kihokim attentionalavoidanceforguiltyknowledgeamongdeceptiveindividuals
AT goeunkim attentionalavoidanceforguiltyknowledgeamongdeceptiveindividuals
AT janghanlee attentionalavoidanceforguiltyknowledgeamongdeceptiveindividuals
_version_ 1725954634051223552