Dental implants inserted in native bone: Cases series analyses

Background: The concept of osseointegration, i.e., the direct anchorage of endosseous implants made of commercially pure or titanium alloy to the bone caused a breakthrough in oral rehabilitation. The identification of factors for long-term survival and success rate are the main goal of the recent l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Riccardo Guidi, Alessandro Viscioni, Frencesco Dattola, Francesco Carinci
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2012-01-01
Series:Dental Research Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2012;volume=9;issue=8;spage=175;epage=180;aulast=Guidi
id doaj-8021e14a7e834bfb8e441e154025e2a1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8021e14a7e834bfb8e441e154025e2a12020-11-25T00:29:14ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsDental Research Journal1735-33272008-02552012-01-019817518010.4103/1735-3327.109747Dental implants inserted in native bone: Cases series analysesRiccardo GuidiAlessandro ViscioniFrencesco DattolaFrancesco CarinciBackground: The concept of osseointegration, i.e., the direct anchorage of endosseous implants made of commercially pure or titanium alloy to the bone caused a breakthrough in oral rehabilitation. The identification of factors for long-term survival and success rate are the main goal of the recent literature. Several variables can influence the final result, and in general they are grouped in surgery-, host-, implant-, and occlusion-related factors. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis on a large series of dental implants was performed to detect those variables influencing the clinical outcome. In the period between January 2007 and December 2009, 157 patients were operated. A total of 429 implants were inserted. Dental implants are reliable devices to be used in oral rehabilitation. Results: Globally, very few implants were lost at the end of the follow-up period. Slight but significant differences existed among different implants types with regard to peri-implant bone resorption. Conclusion: A better clinical outcome was revealed for Sweden and Martina global implant.http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2012;volume=9;issue=8;spage=175;epage=180;aulast=GuidiDentalfixturesimplantoralrehabilitation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Riccardo Guidi
Alessandro Viscioni
Frencesco Dattola
Francesco Carinci
spellingShingle Riccardo Guidi
Alessandro Viscioni
Frencesco Dattola
Francesco Carinci
Dental implants inserted in native bone: Cases series analyses
Dental Research Journal
Dental
fixtures
implant
oral
rehabilitation
author_facet Riccardo Guidi
Alessandro Viscioni
Frencesco Dattola
Francesco Carinci
author_sort Riccardo Guidi
title Dental implants inserted in native bone: Cases series analyses
title_short Dental implants inserted in native bone: Cases series analyses
title_full Dental implants inserted in native bone: Cases series analyses
title_fullStr Dental implants inserted in native bone: Cases series analyses
title_full_unstemmed Dental implants inserted in native bone: Cases series analyses
title_sort dental implants inserted in native bone: cases series analyses
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Dental Research Journal
issn 1735-3327
2008-0255
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Background: The concept of osseointegration, i.e., the direct anchorage of endosseous implants made of commercially pure or titanium alloy to the bone caused a breakthrough in oral rehabilitation. The identification of factors for long-term survival and success rate are the main goal of the recent literature. Several variables can influence the final result, and in general they are grouped in surgery-, host-, implant-, and occlusion-related factors. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis on a large series of dental implants was performed to detect those variables influencing the clinical outcome. In the period between January 2007 and December 2009, 157 patients were operated. A total of 429 implants were inserted. Dental implants are reliable devices to be used in oral rehabilitation. Results: Globally, very few implants were lost at the end of the follow-up period. Slight but significant differences existed among different implants types with regard to peri-implant bone resorption. Conclusion: A better clinical outcome was revealed for Sweden and Martina global implant.
topic Dental
fixtures
implant
oral
rehabilitation
url http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2012;volume=9;issue=8;spage=175;epage=180;aulast=Guidi
work_keys_str_mv AT riccardoguidi dentalimplantsinsertedinnativebonecasesseriesanalyses
AT alessandroviscioni dentalimplantsinsertedinnativebonecasesseriesanalyses
AT frencescodattola dentalimplantsinsertedinnativebonecasesseriesanalyses
AT francescocarinci dentalimplantsinsertedinnativebonecasesseriesanalyses
_version_ 1725332475421392896