Capital Punishment in Singapore: A Critical Analysis of State Justifications From 2004 to 2018
This article examines state justifications for capital punishment in Singapore. Singapore is a unique case study because capital punishment has largely been legitimised and justified by state officials. It illustrates how Singapore justifies capital punishment by analysing official discourse. Discus...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Queensland University of Technology
2020-05-01
|
Series: | International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/1056 |
id |
doaj-801d1a4f1c2f4b64a69b1f6b9419b860 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-801d1a4f1c2f4b64a69b1f6b9419b8602021-06-02T11:06:58ZengQueensland University of TechnologyInternational Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy2202-79982202-80052020-05-019213315110.5204/ijcjsd.v9i2.10561056Capital Punishment in Singapore: A Critical Analysis of State Justifications From 2004 to 2018Ariel Yin Yee Yap0Shih Joo Tan1Monash UniversityMonash UniversityThis article examines state justifications for capital punishment in Singapore. Singapore is a unique case study because capital punishment has largely been legitimised and justified by state officials. It illustrates how Singapore justifies capital punishment by analysing official discourse. Discussion will focus on the government’s narrative on capital punishment, which has been primarily directed against drug trafficking. Discussion will focus on Singapore’s death penalty regime and associated official discourse that seeks to justify state power to exercise such penalties, rather than the ethics and proportionality of capital punishment towards drug-related crimes. Critical analysis from a criminological perspective adds to the growing body of literature that seeks to conceptualise social and political phenomena in South-East Asia.https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/1056legitimacydeath penaltystate powerjustificationwar on drugscommunitarianism |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ariel Yin Yee Yap Shih Joo Tan |
spellingShingle |
Ariel Yin Yee Yap Shih Joo Tan Capital Punishment in Singapore: A Critical Analysis of State Justifications From 2004 to 2018 International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy legitimacy death penalty state power justification war on drugs communitarianism |
author_facet |
Ariel Yin Yee Yap Shih Joo Tan |
author_sort |
Ariel Yin Yee Yap |
title |
Capital Punishment in Singapore: A Critical Analysis of State Justifications From 2004 to 2018 |
title_short |
Capital Punishment in Singapore: A Critical Analysis of State Justifications From 2004 to 2018 |
title_full |
Capital Punishment in Singapore: A Critical Analysis of State Justifications From 2004 to 2018 |
title_fullStr |
Capital Punishment in Singapore: A Critical Analysis of State Justifications From 2004 to 2018 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Capital Punishment in Singapore: A Critical Analysis of State Justifications From 2004 to 2018 |
title_sort |
capital punishment in singapore: a critical analysis of state justifications from 2004 to 2018 |
publisher |
Queensland University of Technology |
series |
International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy |
issn |
2202-7998 2202-8005 |
publishDate |
2020-05-01 |
description |
This article examines state justifications for capital punishment in Singapore. Singapore is a unique case study because capital punishment has largely been legitimised and justified by state officials. It illustrates how Singapore justifies capital punishment by analysing official discourse. Discussion will focus on the government’s narrative on capital punishment, which has been primarily directed against drug trafficking. Discussion will focus on Singapore’s death penalty regime and associated official discourse that seeks to justify state power to exercise such penalties, rather than the ethics and proportionality of capital punishment towards drug-related crimes. Critical analysis from a criminological perspective adds to the growing body of literature that seeks to conceptualise social and political phenomena in South-East Asia. |
topic |
legitimacy death penalty state power justification war on drugs communitarianism |
url |
https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/1056 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT arielyinyeeyap capitalpunishmentinsingaporeacriticalanalysisofstatejustificationsfrom2004to2018 AT shihjootan capitalpunishmentinsingaporeacriticalanalysisofstatejustificationsfrom2004to2018 |
_version_ |
1721404857957482496 |