Time perspective, control, and affect mediate the relation between regulatory mode and procrastination.

This study examines the roles of time perspective, affect, and locus of control in mediating the relationship between regulatory mode and procrastination. Participants filled out the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Scale, Multidimensional Locus of Control I...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eunice E Hang Choy, Him Cheung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207912
id doaj-8018c4b567e642aea32e1aa9af86f822
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8018c4b567e642aea32e1aa9af86f8222021-03-03T21:03:31ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-011312e020791210.1371/journal.pone.0207912Time perspective, control, and affect mediate the relation between regulatory mode and procrastination.Eunice E Hang ChoyHim CheungThis study examines the roles of time perspective, affect, and locus of control in mediating the relationship between regulatory mode and procrastination. Participants filled out the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Scale, Multidimensional Locus of Control Inventory, Locomotion and Assessment Scale, and Lay's General Procrastination scale. Results showed that procrastination was negatively related to locomotion orientation but positively associated with assessment orientation. The relations between regulatory mode and procrastination were mediated by negative affective state, internal sense of control, and negative past and future time perspectives. These findings suggest not only a behavioral link between regulatory mode and procrastination but also affective and cognitive differences in locomotion and assessment orientations that may account for such linkage. The present results also provide empirical support for the theory of locomotion-temporality interface (Kruglanski, Pierro, & Higgins, 2016).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207912
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eunice E Hang Choy
Him Cheung
spellingShingle Eunice E Hang Choy
Him Cheung
Time perspective, control, and affect mediate the relation between regulatory mode and procrastination.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Eunice E Hang Choy
Him Cheung
author_sort Eunice E Hang Choy
title Time perspective, control, and affect mediate the relation between regulatory mode and procrastination.
title_short Time perspective, control, and affect mediate the relation between regulatory mode and procrastination.
title_full Time perspective, control, and affect mediate the relation between regulatory mode and procrastination.
title_fullStr Time perspective, control, and affect mediate the relation between regulatory mode and procrastination.
title_full_unstemmed Time perspective, control, and affect mediate the relation between regulatory mode and procrastination.
title_sort time perspective, control, and affect mediate the relation between regulatory mode and procrastination.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description This study examines the roles of time perspective, affect, and locus of control in mediating the relationship between regulatory mode and procrastination. Participants filled out the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Scale, Multidimensional Locus of Control Inventory, Locomotion and Assessment Scale, and Lay's General Procrastination scale. Results showed that procrastination was negatively related to locomotion orientation but positively associated with assessment orientation. The relations between regulatory mode and procrastination were mediated by negative affective state, internal sense of control, and negative past and future time perspectives. These findings suggest not only a behavioral link between regulatory mode and procrastination but also affective and cognitive differences in locomotion and assessment orientations that may account for such linkage. The present results also provide empirical support for the theory of locomotion-temporality interface (Kruglanski, Pierro, & Higgins, 2016).
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207912
work_keys_str_mv AT euniceehangchoy timeperspectivecontrolandaffectmediatetherelationbetweenregulatorymodeandprocrastination
AT himcheung timeperspectivecontrolandaffectmediatetherelationbetweenregulatorymodeandprocrastination
_version_ 1714819046581469184