Time perspective, control, and affect mediate the relation between regulatory mode and procrastination.
This study examines the roles of time perspective, affect, and locus of control in mediating the relationship between regulatory mode and procrastination. Participants filled out the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Scale, Multidimensional Locus of Control I...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207912 |
id |
doaj-8018c4b567e642aea32e1aa9af86f822 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-8018c4b567e642aea32e1aa9af86f8222021-03-03T21:03:31ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-011312e020791210.1371/journal.pone.0207912Time perspective, control, and affect mediate the relation between regulatory mode and procrastination.Eunice E Hang ChoyHim CheungThis study examines the roles of time perspective, affect, and locus of control in mediating the relationship between regulatory mode and procrastination. Participants filled out the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Scale, Multidimensional Locus of Control Inventory, Locomotion and Assessment Scale, and Lay's General Procrastination scale. Results showed that procrastination was negatively related to locomotion orientation but positively associated with assessment orientation. The relations between regulatory mode and procrastination were mediated by negative affective state, internal sense of control, and negative past and future time perspectives. These findings suggest not only a behavioral link between regulatory mode and procrastination but also affective and cognitive differences in locomotion and assessment orientations that may account for such linkage. The present results also provide empirical support for the theory of locomotion-temporality interface (Kruglanski, Pierro, & Higgins, 2016).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207912 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Eunice E Hang Choy Him Cheung |
spellingShingle |
Eunice E Hang Choy Him Cheung Time perspective, control, and affect mediate the relation between regulatory mode and procrastination. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Eunice E Hang Choy Him Cheung |
author_sort |
Eunice E Hang Choy |
title |
Time perspective, control, and affect mediate the relation between regulatory mode and procrastination. |
title_short |
Time perspective, control, and affect mediate the relation between regulatory mode and procrastination. |
title_full |
Time perspective, control, and affect mediate the relation between regulatory mode and procrastination. |
title_fullStr |
Time perspective, control, and affect mediate the relation between regulatory mode and procrastination. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Time perspective, control, and affect mediate the relation between regulatory mode and procrastination. |
title_sort |
time perspective, control, and affect mediate the relation between regulatory mode and procrastination. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
This study examines the roles of time perspective, affect, and locus of control in mediating the relationship between regulatory mode and procrastination. Participants filled out the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Scale, Multidimensional Locus of Control Inventory, Locomotion and Assessment Scale, and Lay's General Procrastination scale. Results showed that procrastination was negatively related to locomotion orientation but positively associated with assessment orientation. The relations between regulatory mode and procrastination were mediated by negative affective state, internal sense of control, and negative past and future time perspectives. These findings suggest not only a behavioral link between regulatory mode and procrastination but also affective and cognitive differences in locomotion and assessment orientations that may account for such linkage. The present results also provide empirical support for the theory of locomotion-temporality interface (Kruglanski, Pierro, & Higgins, 2016). |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207912 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT euniceehangchoy timeperspectivecontrolandaffectmediatetherelationbetweenregulatorymodeandprocrastination AT himcheung timeperspectivecontrolandaffectmediatetherelationbetweenregulatorymodeandprocrastination |
_version_ |
1714819046581469184 |