Relationship of Cepstral Peak Prominence-Smoothed and Long-Term Average Spectrum with Auditory–Perceptual Analysis

Cepstral peak prominence-smoothed (CPPs) and long-term average spectrum (LTAS) are robust measures that represent the glottal source and source-filter interactions, respectively. Until now, little has been known about how physiological events impact auditory–perceptual characteristics in the objecti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angélica Emygdio da Silva Antonetti, Larissa Thais Donalonso Siqueira, Maria Paula de Almeida Gobbo, Alcione Ghedini Brasolotto, Kelly Cristina Alves Silverio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-12-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/23/8598
id doaj-80152dfdc2994c539908643bf03da999
record_format Article
spelling doaj-80152dfdc2994c539908643bf03da9992020-12-02T00:00:09ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172020-12-01108598859810.3390/app10238598Relationship of Cepstral Peak Prominence-Smoothed and Long-Term Average Spectrum with Auditory–Perceptual AnalysisAngélica Emygdio da Silva Antonetti0Larissa Thais Donalonso Siqueira1Maria Paula de Almeida Gobbo2Alcione Ghedini Brasolotto3Kelly Cristina Alves Silverio4Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology Department, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, SP 17012-901, BrazilSpeech-Language Pathology and Audiology Department, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, SP 17012-901, BrazilSpeech-Language Pathology and Audiology Department, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, SP 17012-901, BrazilSpeech-Language Pathology and Audiology Department, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, SP 17012-901, BrazilSpeech-Language Pathology and Audiology Department, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, SP 17012-901, BrazilCepstral peak prominence-smoothed (CPPs) and long-term average spectrum (LTAS) are robust measures that represent the glottal source and source-filter interactions, respectively. Until now, little has been known about how physiological events impact auditory–perceptual characteristics in the objective measures of CPPs and LTAS (alpha ratio; L1–L0). Thus, this paper aims to analyze the relationship between such acoustic measures and auditory–perceptual analysis and then determine which acoustic measure best represents voice quality. We analyzed 53 voice samples of vocally healthy participants (vocally healthy group-VHG) and 49 voice samples of participants with behavioral dysphonia (dysphonic group-DG). Each voice sample was composed of sustained vowel /a/ and connected speech. CPPs seem to be the best predictor of voice deviation in both studied populations because there was moderate to strong negative correlations with general degree, breathiness, roughness, and strain (auditory–perceptual parameters). Regarding L1–L0, this measure is related to breathiness (moderate negative correlations). Hence, L1–L0 provides information about air leak through closed glottis, assisting the phonatory efficiency analysis.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/23/8598acoustic signal processingspeech signal processingvoice qualitycommunicationdysphoniaauditory–perceptual analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Angélica Emygdio da Silva Antonetti
Larissa Thais Donalonso Siqueira
Maria Paula de Almeida Gobbo
Alcione Ghedini Brasolotto
Kelly Cristina Alves Silverio
spellingShingle Angélica Emygdio da Silva Antonetti
Larissa Thais Donalonso Siqueira
Maria Paula de Almeida Gobbo
Alcione Ghedini Brasolotto
Kelly Cristina Alves Silverio
Relationship of Cepstral Peak Prominence-Smoothed and Long-Term Average Spectrum with Auditory–Perceptual Analysis
Applied Sciences
acoustic signal processing
speech signal processing
voice quality
communication
dysphonia
auditory–perceptual analysis
author_facet Angélica Emygdio da Silva Antonetti
Larissa Thais Donalonso Siqueira
Maria Paula de Almeida Gobbo
Alcione Ghedini Brasolotto
Kelly Cristina Alves Silverio
author_sort Angélica Emygdio da Silva Antonetti
title Relationship of Cepstral Peak Prominence-Smoothed and Long-Term Average Spectrum with Auditory–Perceptual Analysis
title_short Relationship of Cepstral Peak Prominence-Smoothed and Long-Term Average Spectrum with Auditory–Perceptual Analysis
title_full Relationship of Cepstral Peak Prominence-Smoothed and Long-Term Average Spectrum with Auditory–Perceptual Analysis
title_fullStr Relationship of Cepstral Peak Prominence-Smoothed and Long-Term Average Spectrum with Auditory–Perceptual Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Relationship of Cepstral Peak Prominence-Smoothed and Long-Term Average Spectrum with Auditory–Perceptual Analysis
title_sort relationship of cepstral peak prominence-smoothed and long-term average spectrum with auditory–perceptual analysis
publisher MDPI AG
series Applied Sciences
issn 2076-3417
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Cepstral peak prominence-smoothed (CPPs) and long-term average spectrum (LTAS) are robust measures that represent the glottal source and source-filter interactions, respectively. Until now, little has been known about how physiological events impact auditory–perceptual characteristics in the objective measures of CPPs and LTAS (alpha ratio; L1–L0). Thus, this paper aims to analyze the relationship between such acoustic measures and auditory–perceptual analysis and then determine which acoustic measure best represents voice quality. We analyzed 53 voice samples of vocally healthy participants (vocally healthy group-VHG) and 49 voice samples of participants with behavioral dysphonia (dysphonic group-DG). Each voice sample was composed of sustained vowel /a/ and connected speech. CPPs seem to be the best predictor of voice deviation in both studied populations because there was moderate to strong negative correlations with general degree, breathiness, roughness, and strain (auditory–perceptual parameters). Regarding L1–L0, this measure is related to breathiness (moderate negative correlations). Hence, L1–L0 provides information about air leak through closed glottis, assisting the phonatory efficiency analysis.
topic acoustic signal processing
speech signal processing
voice quality
communication
dysphonia
auditory–perceptual analysis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/23/8598
work_keys_str_mv AT angelicaemygdiodasilvaantonetti relationshipofcepstralpeakprominencesmoothedandlongtermaveragespectrumwithauditoryperceptualanalysis
AT larissathaisdonalonsosiqueira relationshipofcepstralpeakprominencesmoothedandlongtermaveragespectrumwithauditoryperceptualanalysis
AT mariapauladealmeidagobbo relationshipofcepstralpeakprominencesmoothedandlongtermaveragespectrumwithauditoryperceptualanalysis
AT alcioneghedinibrasolotto relationshipofcepstralpeakprominencesmoothedandlongtermaveragespectrumwithauditoryperceptualanalysis
AT kellycristinaalvessilverio relationshipofcepstralpeakprominencesmoothedandlongtermaveragespectrumwithauditoryperceptualanalysis
_version_ 1724410620505227264