Procedural Metacognition and False Belief Understanding in 3- to 5-Year-Old Children.

Some studies, so far limited in number, suggest the existence of procedural metacognition in young children, that is, the practical capacity to monitor and control one's own cognitive activity in a given task. The link between procedural metacognition and false belief understanding is currently...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stéphane Bernard, Joëlle Proust, Fabrice Clément
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4627761?pdf=render
id doaj-800570c5f9ae4111877e05e71aa57d9d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-800570c5f9ae4111877e05e71aa57d9d2020-11-25T02:35:08ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-011010e014132110.1371/journal.pone.0141321Procedural Metacognition and False Belief Understanding in 3- to 5-Year-Old Children.Stéphane BernardJoëlle ProustFabrice ClémentSome studies, so far limited in number, suggest the existence of procedural metacognition in young children, that is, the practical capacity to monitor and control one's own cognitive activity in a given task. The link between procedural metacognition and false belief understanding is currently under theoretical discussion. If data with primates seem to indicate that procedural metacognition and false belief understanding are not related, no study in developmental psychology has investigated this relation in young children. The present paper aims, first, to supplement the findings concerning young children's abilities to monitor and control their uncertainty (procedural metacognition) and, second, to explore the relation between procedural metacognition and false belief understanding. To examine this, 82 3- to 5-year-old children were presented with an opt-out task and with 3 false belief tasks. Results show that children can rely on procedural metacognition to evaluate their perceptual access to information, and that success in false belief tasks does not seem related to success in the task we used to evaluate procedural metacognition. These results are coherent with a procedural view of metacognition, and are discussed in the light of recent data from primatology and developmental psychology.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4627761?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stéphane Bernard
Joëlle Proust
Fabrice Clément
spellingShingle Stéphane Bernard
Joëlle Proust
Fabrice Clément
Procedural Metacognition and False Belief Understanding in 3- to 5-Year-Old Children.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Stéphane Bernard
Joëlle Proust
Fabrice Clément
author_sort Stéphane Bernard
title Procedural Metacognition and False Belief Understanding in 3- to 5-Year-Old Children.
title_short Procedural Metacognition and False Belief Understanding in 3- to 5-Year-Old Children.
title_full Procedural Metacognition and False Belief Understanding in 3- to 5-Year-Old Children.
title_fullStr Procedural Metacognition and False Belief Understanding in 3- to 5-Year-Old Children.
title_full_unstemmed Procedural Metacognition and False Belief Understanding in 3- to 5-Year-Old Children.
title_sort procedural metacognition and false belief understanding in 3- to 5-year-old children.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Some studies, so far limited in number, suggest the existence of procedural metacognition in young children, that is, the practical capacity to monitor and control one's own cognitive activity in a given task. The link between procedural metacognition and false belief understanding is currently under theoretical discussion. If data with primates seem to indicate that procedural metacognition and false belief understanding are not related, no study in developmental psychology has investigated this relation in young children. The present paper aims, first, to supplement the findings concerning young children's abilities to monitor and control their uncertainty (procedural metacognition) and, second, to explore the relation between procedural metacognition and false belief understanding. To examine this, 82 3- to 5-year-old children were presented with an opt-out task and with 3 false belief tasks. Results show that children can rely on procedural metacognition to evaluate their perceptual access to information, and that success in false belief tasks does not seem related to success in the task we used to evaluate procedural metacognition. These results are coherent with a procedural view of metacognition, and are discussed in the light of recent data from primatology and developmental psychology.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4627761?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT stephanebernard proceduralmetacognitionandfalsebeliefunderstandingin3to5yearoldchildren
AT joelleproust proceduralmetacognitionandfalsebeliefunderstandingin3to5yearoldchildren
AT fabriceclement proceduralmetacognitionandfalsebeliefunderstandingin3to5yearoldchildren
_version_ 1724805249257963520