Track Segment Association via track graph representation learning

Abstract Traditional Track Segment Association (TSA) methods used track position vectors or other track information to get association results. However, simply extracting the track position information to form track vectors will lead to the loss of irregular structure information. To solve this prob...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wei Xiong, Pingliang Xu, Yaqi Cui, Zhenyu Xiong, Xiangqi Gu, Yafei Lv
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-11-01
Series:IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1049/rsn2.12138
id doaj-7ff9239265134fdc967ceb6dbcff88e4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7ff9239265134fdc967ceb6dbcff88e42021-10-11T07:44:23ZengWileyIET Radar, Sonar & Navigation1751-87841751-87922021-11-0115111458147110.1049/rsn2.12138Track Segment Association via track graph representation learningWei Xiong0Pingliang Xu1Yaqi Cui2Zhenyu Xiong3Xiangqi Gu4Yafei Lv5Institute of Information Fusion Naval Aviation University Yantai264001 ChinaInstitute of Information Fusion Naval Aviation University Yantai264001 ChinaInstitute of Information Fusion Naval Aviation University Yantai264001 ChinaInstitute of Information Fusion Naval Aviation University Yantai264001 ChinaInstitute of Information Fusion Naval Aviation University Yantai264001 ChinaInstitute of Information Fusion Naval Aviation University Yantai264001 ChinaAbstract Traditional Track Segment Association (TSA) methods used track position vectors or other track information to get association results. However, simply extracting the track position information to form track vectors will lead to the loss of irregular structure information. To solve this problem, a Track Graph Representation Association (TGRA) method is proposed. Through node‐level local track point embedding and graph‐level track graph embedding, representations of track segments can be obtained and irregular structure information can be retained simultaneously. Then, by the constraint of loss function, track segments belonging to the same target become closer, track segments belonging to different targets become farther in representation space. Finally, the nearest neighbour embedding in representation space is picked as associated tracks. Simulation results demonstrate that TGRA has good adaptability and anti‐noise ability, and it can outperform other TSA methods in both quality and efficiency. Compared with the best performance, the average true association rate of TGRA can be increased by 2.8% in short interrupt intervals and 1.3% in long interrupt intervals, respectively.https://doi.org/10.1049/rsn2.12138
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wei Xiong
Pingliang Xu
Yaqi Cui
Zhenyu Xiong
Xiangqi Gu
Yafei Lv
spellingShingle Wei Xiong
Pingliang Xu
Yaqi Cui
Zhenyu Xiong
Xiangqi Gu
Yafei Lv
Track Segment Association via track graph representation learning
IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation
author_facet Wei Xiong
Pingliang Xu
Yaqi Cui
Zhenyu Xiong
Xiangqi Gu
Yafei Lv
author_sort Wei Xiong
title Track Segment Association via track graph representation learning
title_short Track Segment Association via track graph representation learning
title_full Track Segment Association via track graph representation learning
title_fullStr Track Segment Association via track graph representation learning
title_full_unstemmed Track Segment Association via track graph representation learning
title_sort track segment association via track graph representation learning
publisher Wiley
series IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation
issn 1751-8784
1751-8792
publishDate 2021-11-01
description Abstract Traditional Track Segment Association (TSA) methods used track position vectors or other track information to get association results. However, simply extracting the track position information to form track vectors will lead to the loss of irregular structure information. To solve this problem, a Track Graph Representation Association (TGRA) method is proposed. Through node‐level local track point embedding and graph‐level track graph embedding, representations of track segments can be obtained and irregular structure information can be retained simultaneously. Then, by the constraint of loss function, track segments belonging to the same target become closer, track segments belonging to different targets become farther in representation space. Finally, the nearest neighbour embedding in representation space is picked as associated tracks. Simulation results demonstrate that TGRA has good adaptability and anti‐noise ability, and it can outperform other TSA methods in both quality and efficiency. Compared with the best performance, the average true association rate of TGRA can be increased by 2.8% in short interrupt intervals and 1.3% in long interrupt intervals, respectively.
url https://doi.org/10.1049/rsn2.12138
work_keys_str_mv AT weixiong tracksegmentassociationviatrackgraphrepresentationlearning
AT pingliangxu tracksegmentassociationviatrackgraphrepresentationlearning
AT yaqicui tracksegmentassociationviatrackgraphrepresentationlearning
AT zhenyuxiong tracksegmentassociationviatrackgraphrepresentationlearning
AT xiangqigu tracksegmentassociationviatrackgraphrepresentationlearning
AT yafeilv tracksegmentassociationviatrackgraphrepresentationlearning
_version_ 1716828274986844160