Incidence and types of vascular accesses in patients on chronic hemodialysis in Clinic for Nephrology, Clinical Centre of Serbia

Introduction: End-stage renal disease is the last stage of chronic renal disease and it is treated with renal replacement therapy. Hemodialysis (HD) represents a type of renal replacement therapy, which requires a vascular access. Types of vascular accesses are: arteriovenous fistula (AVF), arteriov...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marić Nikola, Brković Voin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Belgrade, Medical Faculty 2018-01-01
Series:Medicinski Podmladak
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0369-1527/2018/0369-15271801023M.pdf
id doaj-7fef687b4a5540ac9550e12aa904c868
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7fef687b4a5540ac9550e12aa904c8682020-11-25T02:28:57ZengUniversity of Belgrade, Medical FacultyMedicinski Podmladak0369-15272466-55252018-01-0169123280369-15271801023MIncidence and types of vascular accesses in patients on chronic hemodialysis in Clinic for Nephrology, Clinical Centre of SerbiaMarić Nikola0Brković Voin1Univerzitet u Beogradu, Medicinski fakultet, BeogradUniverzitet u Beogradu, Medicinski fakultet, Beograd + Klinički centar Srbije, Klinika za nefrologiju, BeogradIntroduction: End-stage renal disease is the last stage of chronic renal disease and it is treated with renal replacement therapy. Hemodialysis (HD) represents a type of renal replacement therapy, which requires a vascular access. Types of vascular accesses are: arteriovenous fistula (AVF), arteriovenous graft (AVG), temporary as well as permanent catheter. Because of the importance of HD, the proper function of vascular access is paramount. Aim: To present the incidence and types of vascular accesses for hemodialysis in patients with ESRD, as well as show their complications (if any). Material and methods: Study included 153 participants treated at Clinic of nephrology, Clinical Center of Serbia, during 2014 and 2015. Participants were admissioned to create vascular access prior to hemodialysis, to immediately start hemodialysis due to uremic syndrome, and patients whose vascular access was malfunctioning. Clinical and demographic data was collected from medical records. Results: The most often created vascular access was primary AVF (68,7%), REDO AVF was created to 11,1% while Hickman line was implanted to 15%, and AVG to 3,9% patients (p<0,001). Patients with Hickman line were significantly older (72 vs. 63, p=0,013) and had a higher mortality rate (17,4% vs. 3,1%, p=0,004) compared to patients with AVF and AVG. Vascular access thrombosis was the most common complication (80% vs. 20%, p<0,001). Central venous catheter for HD was placed in 19,6% cases, due to nonexistent vascular access, and in 23,5% CVC was used until the maturation of vascular access. Mortality rate was significantly lower in patients with prior created vascular access, than in those who had to be put on emergency dialysis via CVC (3,3% vs. 13,3%, p=0,026). Conclusion: AVF is the most common vascular access for HD. Predominant complication of vascular access is its thrombosis. Elective creation of vascular access for HD significantly affects mortality rate.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0369-1527/2018/0369-15271801023M.pdfend-stage renal diseasehemodialysisvascular access
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marić Nikola
Brković Voin
spellingShingle Marić Nikola
Brković Voin
Incidence and types of vascular accesses in patients on chronic hemodialysis in Clinic for Nephrology, Clinical Centre of Serbia
Medicinski Podmladak
end-stage renal disease
hemodialysis
vascular access
author_facet Marić Nikola
Brković Voin
author_sort Marić Nikola
title Incidence and types of vascular accesses in patients on chronic hemodialysis in Clinic for Nephrology, Clinical Centre of Serbia
title_short Incidence and types of vascular accesses in patients on chronic hemodialysis in Clinic for Nephrology, Clinical Centre of Serbia
title_full Incidence and types of vascular accesses in patients on chronic hemodialysis in Clinic for Nephrology, Clinical Centre of Serbia
title_fullStr Incidence and types of vascular accesses in patients on chronic hemodialysis in Clinic for Nephrology, Clinical Centre of Serbia
title_full_unstemmed Incidence and types of vascular accesses in patients on chronic hemodialysis in Clinic for Nephrology, Clinical Centre of Serbia
title_sort incidence and types of vascular accesses in patients on chronic hemodialysis in clinic for nephrology, clinical centre of serbia
publisher University of Belgrade, Medical Faculty
series Medicinski Podmladak
issn 0369-1527
2466-5525
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Introduction: End-stage renal disease is the last stage of chronic renal disease and it is treated with renal replacement therapy. Hemodialysis (HD) represents a type of renal replacement therapy, which requires a vascular access. Types of vascular accesses are: arteriovenous fistula (AVF), arteriovenous graft (AVG), temporary as well as permanent catheter. Because of the importance of HD, the proper function of vascular access is paramount. Aim: To present the incidence and types of vascular accesses for hemodialysis in patients with ESRD, as well as show their complications (if any). Material and methods: Study included 153 participants treated at Clinic of nephrology, Clinical Center of Serbia, during 2014 and 2015. Participants were admissioned to create vascular access prior to hemodialysis, to immediately start hemodialysis due to uremic syndrome, and patients whose vascular access was malfunctioning. Clinical and demographic data was collected from medical records. Results: The most often created vascular access was primary AVF (68,7%), REDO AVF was created to 11,1% while Hickman line was implanted to 15%, and AVG to 3,9% patients (p<0,001). Patients with Hickman line were significantly older (72 vs. 63, p=0,013) and had a higher mortality rate (17,4% vs. 3,1%, p=0,004) compared to patients with AVF and AVG. Vascular access thrombosis was the most common complication (80% vs. 20%, p<0,001). Central venous catheter for HD was placed in 19,6% cases, due to nonexistent vascular access, and in 23,5% CVC was used until the maturation of vascular access. Mortality rate was significantly lower in patients with prior created vascular access, than in those who had to be put on emergency dialysis via CVC (3,3% vs. 13,3%, p=0,026). Conclusion: AVF is the most common vascular access for HD. Predominant complication of vascular access is its thrombosis. Elective creation of vascular access for HD significantly affects mortality rate.
topic end-stage renal disease
hemodialysis
vascular access
url https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0369-1527/2018/0369-15271801023M.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT maricnikola incidenceandtypesofvascularaccessesinpatientsonchronichemodialysisinclinicfornephrologyclinicalcentreofserbia
AT brkovicvoin incidenceandtypesofvascularaccessesinpatientsonchronichemodialysisinclinicfornephrologyclinicalcentreofserbia
_version_ 1724835319566565376