Determining the Isotopic Composition of Surface Water Vapor Flux From High‐Frequency Observations Using Flux‐Gradient and Keeling Plot Methods

Abstract The isotopic composition of surface water vapor flux (δE) is a quantity frequently used to investigate the local and regional water cycle. This study reports the results of a comparative evaluation of δE determined with the Keeling plot and the flux‐gradient methods using high‐frequency dat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yongbo Hu, Wei Xiao, Zhongwang Wei, Lisa R. Welp, Xuefa Wen, Xuhui Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2021-03-01
Series:Earth and Space Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001304
id doaj-7fe57cf50c9840f992a2bf9ad2825370
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7fe57cf50c9840f992a2bf9ad28253702021-03-26T21:46:39ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Earth and Space Science2333-50842021-03-0183n/an/a10.1029/2020EA001304Determining the Isotopic Composition of Surface Water Vapor Flux From High‐Frequency Observations Using Flux‐Gradient and Keeling Plot MethodsYongbo Hu0Wei Xiao1Zhongwang Wei2Lisa R. Welp3Xuefa Wen4Xuhui Lee5Yale‐NUIST Center on Atmospheric Environment International Joint Laboratory on Climate and Environment Change (ILCEC) Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology Nanjing ChinaYale‐NUIST Center on Atmospheric Environment International Joint Laboratory on Climate and Environment Change (ILCEC) Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology Nanjing ChinaGuangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies School of Atmospheric Sciences Sun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou ChinaDepartment of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Purdue University West Lafayette IN USAInstitute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing ChinaSchool of the Environment Yale University New Haven CT USAAbstract The isotopic composition of surface water vapor flux (δE) is a quantity frequently used to investigate the local and regional water cycle. This study reports the results of a comparative evaluation of δE determined with the Keeling plot and the flux‐gradient methods using high‐frequency data collected at a cropland site and a lake site. Three regression models, ordinary least squares (OLS), York's solution (YS), and geometric mean regression, were tested with the Keeling plot method. Results show that concentration‐dependent field characterization of measurement errors can improve the estimation of the YS regression. For both sites, broad agreement was achieved among the Keeling plot method with YS regression, the Keeling plot method with OLS regression and the flux‐gradient method. For the lake site, OLS was the least biased of the three regression models in reference to the δE calculated by the Craig‐Gordon (CG) model of isotopic evaporation of open water. Good agreement was aslo achieved between the flux‐gradient method and the CG model at the lake site under open‐fetch conditions. A footprint analysis suggests that the Keeling method with OLS regression may be less sensitive to fetch than the flux‐gradient method.https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001304flux‐gradient methodisotopic composition of surface water vapor fluxhigh‐frequencyKeeling plot method
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yongbo Hu
Wei Xiao
Zhongwang Wei
Lisa R. Welp
Xuefa Wen
Xuhui Lee
spellingShingle Yongbo Hu
Wei Xiao
Zhongwang Wei
Lisa R. Welp
Xuefa Wen
Xuhui Lee
Determining the Isotopic Composition of Surface Water Vapor Flux From High‐Frequency Observations Using Flux‐Gradient and Keeling Plot Methods
Earth and Space Science
flux‐gradient method
isotopic composition of surface water vapor flux
high‐frequency
Keeling plot method
author_facet Yongbo Hu
Wei Xiao
Zhongwang Wei
Lisa R. Welp
Xuefa Wen
Xuhui Lee
author_sort Yongbo Hu
title Determining the Isotopic Composition of Surface Water Vapor Flux From High‐Frequency Observations Using Flux‐Gradient and Keeling Plot Methods
title_short Determining the Isotopic Composition of Surface Water Vapor Flux From High‐Frequency Observations Using Flux‐Gradient and Keeling Plot Methods
title_full Determining the Isotopic Composition of Surface Water Vapor Flux From High‐Frequency Observations Using Flux‐Gradient and Keeling Plot Methods
title_fullStr Determining the Isotopic Composition of Surface Water Vapor Flux From High‐Frequency Observations Using Flux‐Gradient and Keeling Plot Methods
title_full_unstemmed Determining the Isotopic Composition of Surface Water Vapor Flux From High‐Frequency Observations Using Flux‐Gradient and Keeling Plot Methods
title_sort determining the isotopic composition of surface water vapor flux from high‐frequency observations using flux‐gradient and keeling plot methods
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
series Earth and Space Science
issn 2333-5084
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract The isotopic composition of surface water vapor flux (δE) is a quantity frequently used to investigate the local and regional water cycle. This study reports the results of a comparative evaluation of δE determined with the Keeling plot and the flux‐gradient methods using high‐frequency data collected at a cropland site and a lake site. Three regression models, ordinary least squares (OLS), York's solution (YS), and geometric mean regression, were tested with the Keeling plot method. Results show that concentration‐dependent field characterization of measurement errors can improve the estimation of the YS regression. For both sites, broad agreement was achieved among the Keeling plot method with YS regression, the Keeling plot method with OLS regression and the flux‐gradient method. For the lake site, OLS was the least biased of the three regression models in reference to the δE calculated by the Craig‐Gordon (CG) model of isotopic evaporation of open water. Good agreement was aslo achieved between the flux‐gradient method and the CG model at the lake site under open‐fetch conditions. A footprint analysis suggests that the Keeling method with OLS regression may be less sensitive to fetch than the flux‐gradient method.
topic flux‐gradient method
isotopic composition of surface water vapor flux
high‐frequency
Keeling plot method
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001304
work_keys_str_mv AT yongbohu determiningtheisotopiccompositionofsurfacewatervaporfluxfromhighfrequencyobservationsusingfluxgradientandkeelingplotmethods
AT weixiao determiningtheisotopiccompositionofsurfacewatervaporfluxfromhighfrequencyobservationsusingfluxgradientandkeelingplotmethods
AT zhongwangwei determiningtheisotopiccompositionofsurfacewatervaporfluxfromhighfrequencyobservationsusingfluxgradientandkeelingplotmethods
AT lisarwelp determiningtheisotopiccompositionofsurfacewatervaporfluxfromhighfrequencyobservationsusingfluxgradientandkeelingplotmethods
AT xuefawen determiningtheisotopiccompositionofsurfacewatervaporfluxfromhighfrequencyobservationsusingfluxgradientandkeelingplotmethods
AT xuhuilee determiningtheisotopiccompositionofsurfacewatervaporfluxfromhighfrequencyobservationsusingfluxgradientandkeelingplotmethods
_version_ 1724201823120654336