Structure–behaviour correlations between two genetically closely related snail species

Species, through their structure and composition, have evolved to respond to environmental constraints. Predator–prey interactions are among environmental pressures that can lead to speciation, but it remains unclear how this pressure can be related to the material structure and performance. Recentl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. Le Ferrand, Y. Morii
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2020-01-01
Series:Royal Society Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.191471
id doaj-7fcf8d70df894038b1d5bd4477a047f9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7fcf8d70df894038b1d5bd4477a047f92020-11-25T04:07:54ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032020-01-017110.1098/rsos.191471191471Structure–behaviour correlations between two genetically closely related snail speciesH. Le FerrandY. MoriiSpecies, through their structure and composition, have evolved to respond to environmental constraints. Predator–prey interactions are among environmental pressures that can lead to speciation, but it remains unclear how this pressure can be related to the material structure and performance. Recently, two land snails, Karaftohelix editha and Karaftohelix gainesi, were found to exhibit divergent phenotypes and responses to predation despite sharing the same habitat and most of their genome. Indeed, under attack from a beetle, K. editha snails retract into their shell whereas K. gainesi snails swing their shell. In this paper, we looked at the microstructure, composition, morphology and mechanics of the shells of those two species and discuss potential relationships between material structure and the snail defence behaviour. The results of this study provide additional arguments for the role of predator–prey interactions on speciation, as well as an unusual approach for the design of biomimetic structures adapted to a particular function.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.191471microstructurephenotypepredator–prey interactionsnail shelldefence mechanism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author H. Le Ferrand
Y. Morii
spellingShingle H. Le Ferrand
Y. Morii
Structure–behaviour correlations between two genetically closely related snail species
Royal Society Open Science
microstructure
phenotype
predator–prey interaction
snail shell
defence mechanism
author_facet H. Le Ferrand
Y. Morii
author_sort H. Le Ferrand
title Structure–behaviour correlations between two genetically closely related snail species
title_short Structure–behaviour correlations between two genetically closely related snail species
title_full Structure–behaviour correlations between two genetically closely related snail species
title_fullStr Structure–behaviour correlations between two genetically closely related snail species
title_full_unstemmed Structure–behaviour correlations between two genetically closely related snail species
title_sort structure–behaviour correlations between two genetically closely related snail species
publisher The Royal Society
series Royal Society Open Science
issn 2054-5703
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Species, through their structure and composition, have evolved to respond to environmental constraints. Predator–prey interactions are among environmental pressures that can lead to speciation, but it remains unclear how this pressure can be related to the material structure and performance. Recently, two land snails, Karaftohelix editha and Karaftohelix gainesi, were found to exhibit divergent phenotypes and responses to predation despite sharing the same habitat and most of their genome. Indeed, under attack from a beetle, K. editha snails retract into their shell whereas K. gainesi snails swing their shell. In this paper, we looked at the microstructure, composition, morphology and mechanics of the shells of those two species and discuss potential relationships between material structure and the snail defence behaviour. The results of this study provide additional arguments for the role of predator–prey interactions on speciation, as well as an unusual approach for the design of biomimetic structures adapted to a particular function.
topic microstructure
phenotype
predator–prey interaction
snail shell
defence mechanism
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.191471
work_keys_str_mv AT hleferrand structurebehaviourcorrelationsbetweentwogeneticallycloselyrelatedsnailspecies
AT ymorii structurebehaviourcorrelationsbetweentwogeneticallycloselyrelatedsnailspecies
_version_ 1724427498579558400