Matching social-ecological systems by understanding the spatial scale of environmental attitudes

Mismatching in the spatial scales of social structures and ecological processes complicates the management of natural resources. Here we suggest the use of variance components to determine at which spatial scale variation in feelings, environmental attitudes and value orientation i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harry P. Andreassen, Kristin E. Gangaas, Bjørn P. Kaltenborn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2018-11-01
Series:Nature Conservation
Online Access:https://natureconservation.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=28289
id doaj-7fcaa61698264ada8c2a84fb2ce5ef1d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7fcaa61698264ada8c2a84fb2ce5ef1d2020-11-24T21:48:02ZengPensoft PublishersNature Conservation1314-69471314-33012018-11-0130698110.3897/natureconservation.30.2828928289Matching social-ecological systems by understanding the spatial scale of environmental attitudesHarry P. Andreassen0Kristin E. Gangaas1Bjørn P. Kaltenborn2Inland Norway University of Applied SciencesInland Norway University of Applied SciencesNorwegian Institute of Nature Research Mismatching in the spatial scales of social structures and ecological processes complicates the management of natural resources. Here we suggest the use of variance components to determine at which spatial scale variation in feelings, environmental attitudes and value orientation is largest and hence most exposed to conflicts. We estimated the variance components of the feeling of fear for large carnivores, environmental attitudes towards large carnivores and environmental value orientation at 3 scales (municipality, county and country) in Norway and Sweden. The feeling of fear for specific carnivores had the highest variance components at the municipality level, we found no specific scale that best explained the variance in attitudes towards carnivores in general, while attitudes based on environmental value orientation showed the highest variance components at the country level. To match the social-ecological systems, we conclude that management units have to be designed as the best possible trade-off between the social and ecological scales; i.e. largest possible to maintain ecological sustainability, but small enough to maintain a low degree of social conflicts. https://natureconservation.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=28289
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Harry P. Andreassen
Kristin E. Gangaas
Bjørn P. Kaltenborn
spellingShingle Harry P. Andreassen
Kristin E. Gangaas
Bjørn P. Kaltenborn
Matching social-ecological systems by understanding the spatial scale of environmental attitudes
Nature Conservation
author_facet Harry P. Andreassen
Kristin E. Gangaas
Bjørn P. Kaltenborn
author_sort Harry P. Andreassen
title Matching social-ecological systems by understanding the spatial scale of environmental attitudes
title_short Matching social-ecological systems by understanding the spatial scale of environmental attitudes
title_full Matching social-ecological systems by understanding the spatial scale of environmental attitudes
title_fullStr Matching social-ecological systems by understanding the spatial scale of environmental attitudes
title_full_unstemmed Matching social-ecological systems by understanding the spatial scale of environmental attitudes
title_sort matching social-ecological systems by understanding the spatial scale of environmental attitudes
publisher Pensoft Publishers
series Nature Conservation
issn 1314-6947
1314-3301
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Mismatching in the spatial scales of social structures and ecological processes complicates the management of natural resources. Here we suggest the use of variance components to determine at which spatial scale variation in feelings, environmental attitudes and value orientation is largest and hence most exposed to conflicts. We estimated the variance components of the feeling of fear for large carnivores, environmental attitudes towards large carnivores and environmental value orientation at 3 scales (municipality, county and country) in Norway and Sweden. The feeling of fear for specific carnivores had the highest variance components at the municipality level, we found no specific scale that best explained the variance in attitudes towards carnivores in general, while attitudes based on environmental value orientation showed the highest variance components at the country level. To match the social-ecological systems, we conclude that management units have to be designed as the best possible trade-off between the social and ecological scales; i.e. largest possible to maintain ecological sustainability, but small enough to maintain a low degree of social conflicts.
url https://natureconservation.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=28289
work_keys_str_mv AT harrypandreassen matchingsocialecologicalsystemsbyunderstandingthespatialscaleofenvironmentalattitudes
AT kristinegangaas matchingsocialecologicalsystemsbyunderstandingthespatialscaleofenvironmentalattitudes
AT bjørnpkaltenborn matchingsocialecologicalsystemsbyunderstandingthespatialscaleofenvironmentalattitudes
_version_ 1725893822889590784