Directional collective cell migration emerges as a property of cell interactions.

Collective cell migration is a fundamental process, occurring during embryogenesis and cancer metastasis. Neural crest cells exhibit such coordinated migration, where aberrant motion can lead to fatality or dysfunction of the embryo. Migration involves at least two complementary mechanisms: contact...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mae L Woods, Carlos Carmona-Fontaine, Chris P Barnes, Iain D Couzin, Roberto Mayor, Karen M Page
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4152153?pdf=render
id doaj-7fafc721472c47b49d6920d637fab760
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7fafc721472c47b49d6920d637fab7602020-11-25T01:21:31ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0199e10496910.1371/journal.pone.0104969Directional collective cell migration emerges as a property of cell interactions.Mae L WoodsCarlos Carmona-FontaineChris P BarnesIain D CouzinRoberto MayorKaren M PageCollective cell migration is a fundamental process, occurring during embryogenesis and cancer metastasis. Neural crest cells exhibit such coordinated migration, where aberrant motion can lead to fatality or dysfunction of the embryo. Migration involves at least two complementary mechanisms: contact inhibition of locomotion (a repulsive interaction corresponding to a directional change of migration upon contact with a reciprocating cell), and co-attraction (a mutual chemoattraction mechanism). Here, we develop and employ a parameterized discrete element model of neural crest cells, to investigate how these mechanisms contribute to long-range directional migration during development. Motion is characterized using a coherence parameter and the time taken to reach, collectively, a target location. The simulated cell group is shown to switch from a diffusive to a persistent state as the response-rate to co-attraction is increased. Furthermore, the model predicts that when co-attraction is inhibited, neural crest cells can migrate into restrictive regions. Indeed, inhibition of co-attraction in vivo and in vitro leads to cell invasion into restrictive areas, confirming the prediction of the model. This suggests that the interplay between the complementary mechanisms may contribute to guidance of the neural crest. We conclude that directional migration is a system property and does not require action of external chemoattractants.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4152153?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mae L Woods
Carlos Carmona-Fontaine
Chris P Barnes
Iain D Couzin
Roberto Mayor
Karen M Page
spellingShingle Mae L Woods
Carlos Carmona-Fontaine
Chris P Barnes
Iain D Couzin
Roberto Mayor
Karen M Page
Directional collective cell migration emerges as a property of cell interactions.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Mae L Woods
Carlos Carmona-Fontaine
Chris P Barnes
Iain D Couzin
Roberto Mayor
Karen M Page
author_sort Mae L Woods
title Directional collective cell migration emerges as a property of cell interactions.
title_short Directional collective cell migration emerges as a property of cell interactions.
title_full Directional collective cell migration emerges as a property of cell interactions.
title_fullStr Directional collective cell migration emerges as a property of cell interactions.
title_full_unstemmed Directional collective cell migration emerges as a property of cell interactions.
title_sort directional collective cell migration emerges as a property of cell interactions.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Collective cell migration is a fundamental process, occurring during embryogenesis and cancer metastasis. Neural crest cells exhibit such coordinated migration, where aberrant motion can lead to fatality or dysfunction of the embryo. Migration involves at least two complementary mechanisms: contact inhibition of locomotion (a repulsive interaction corresponding to a directional change of migration upon contact with a reciprocating cell), and co-attraction (a mutual chemoattraction mechanism). Here, we develop and employ a parameterized discrete element model of neural crest cells, to investigate how these mechanisms contribute to long-range directional migration during development. Motion is characterized using a coherence parameter and the time taken to reach, collectively, a target location. The simulated cell group is shown to switch from a diffusive to a persistent state as the response-rate to co-attraction is increased. Furthermore, the model predicts that when co-attraction is inhibited, neural crest cells can migrate into restrictive regions. Indeed, inhibition of co-attraction in vivo and in vitro leads to cell invasion into restrictive areas, confirming the prediction of the model. This suggests that the interplay between the complementary mechanisms may contribute to guidance of the neural crest. We conclude that directional migration is a system property and does not require action of external chemoattractants.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4152153?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT maelwoods directionalcollectivecellmigrationemergesasapropertyofcellinteractions
AT carloscarmonafontaine directionalcollectivecellmigrationemergesasapropertyofcellinteractions
AT chrispbarnes directionalcollectivecellmigrationemergesasapropertyofcellinteractions
AT iaindcouzin directionalcollectivecellmigrationemergesasapropertyofcellinteractions
AT robertomayor directionalcollectivecellmigrationemergesasapropertyofcellinteractions
AT karenmpage directionalcollectivecellmigrationemergesasapropertyofcellinteractions
_version_ 1725129760012500992