The effects of a temporal framing manipulation on environmentalism: A replication and extension.

Recent research promotes comparing the current state of the environment with the past (and not the future) to increase the pro-environmental attitudes of those on the political right. We aimed to replicate this temporal framing effect and extend on research in this area by testing the potential driv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Samantha K Stanley, Anna Klas, Edward J R Clarke, Iain Walker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246058
id doaj-7faa2584fa9848e7b1a3a32c29d2e369
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7faa2584fa9848e7b1a3a32c29d2e3692021-07-28T04:31:15ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01162e024605810.1371/journal.pone.0246058The effects of a temporal framing manipulation on environmentalism: A replication and extension.Samantha K StanleyAnna KlasEdward J R ClarkeIain WalkerRecent research promotes comparing the current state of the environment with the past (and not the future) to increase the pro-environmental attitudes of those on the political right. We aimed to replicate this temporal framing effect and extend on research in this area by testing the potential drivers of the effect. Across two large-scale replication studies, we found limited evidence that past comparisons (relative to future comparisons) increase pro-environmentalism among those with a more conservative political ideology, thus precluding a full investigation into the mediators of the effect. Where the effect was present, it was not consistent across studies. In Study One, conservatives reported greater certainty that climate change was real after viewing past comparisons, as the environmental changes were perceived as more certain. However, in Study Two, the temporal framing condition interacted with political orientation to instead undermine the certainty about climate change among political liberals in the past-focused condition. Together, these studies present the first evidence of backfire from temporal frames, and do not support the efficacy of past comparisons for increasing conservatives' environmentalism. We echo recent calls for open science principles, including preregistration and efforts to replicate existing work, and suggest the replication of other methods of inducing temporal comparisons.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246058
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Samantha K Stanley
Anna Klas
Edward J R Clarke
Iain Walker
spellingShingle Samantha K Stanley
Anna Klas
Edward J R Clarke
Iain Walker
The effects of a temporal framing manipulation on environmentalism: A replication and extension.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Samantha K Stanley
Anna Klas
Edward J R Clarke
Iain Walker
author_sort Samantha K Stanley
title The effects of a temporal framing manipulation on environmentalism: A replication and extension.
title_short The effects of a temporal framing manipulation on environmentalism: A replication and extension.
title_full The effects of a temporal framing manipulation on environmentalism: A replication and extension.
title_fullStr The effects of a temporal framing manipulation on environmentalism: A replication and extension.
title_full_unstemmed The effects of a temporal framing manipulation on environmentalism: A replication and extension.
title_sort effects of a temporal framing manipulation on environmentalism: a replication and extension.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Recent research promotes comparing the current state of the environment with the past (and not the future) to increase the pro-environmental attitudes of those on the political right. We aimed to replicate this temporal framing effect and extend on research in this area by testing the potential drivers of the effect. Across two large-scale replication studies, we found limited evidence that past comparisons (relative to future comparisons) increase pro-environmentalism among those with a more conservative political ideology, thus precluding a full investigation into the mediators of the effect. Where the effect was present, it was not consistent across studies. In Study One, conservatives reported greater certainty that climate change was real after viewing past comparisons, as the environmental changes were perceived as more certain. However, in Study Two, the temporal framing condition interacted with political orientation to instead undermine the certainty about climate change among political liberals in the past-focused condition. Together, these studies present the first evidence of backfire from temporal frames, and do not support the efficacy of past comparisons for increasing conservatives' environmentalism. We echo recent calls for open science principles, including preregistration and efforts to replicate existing work, and suggest the replication of other methods of inducing temporal comparisons.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246058
work_keys_str_mv AT samanthakstanley theeffectsofatemporalframingmanipulationonenvironmentalismareplicationandextension
AT annaklas theeffectsofatemporalframingmanipulationonenvironmentalismareplicationandextension
AT edwardjrclarke theeffectsofatemporalframingmanipulationonenvironmentalismareplicationandextension
AT iainwalker theeffectsofatemporalframingmanipulationonenvironmentalismareplicationandextension
AT samanthakstanley effectsofatemporalframingmanipulationonenvironmentalismareplicationandextension
AT annaklas effectsofatemporalframingmanipulationonenvironmentalismareplicationandextension
AT edwardjrclarke effectsofatemporalframingmanipulationonenvironmentalismareplicationandextension
AT iainwalker effectsofatemporalframingmanipulationonenvironmentalismareplicationandextension
_version_ 1721279156825620480