Cognitive Training in Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of Studies from 2000 to 2014

Cognitive deficits are prevalent among patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), in both early and late stages of the disease. These deficits are associated with lower quality of life, loss of independence, and institutionalization. To date, there is no effective pharmacological treatment for the rang...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Glizer, Penny A. MacDonald
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2016-01-01
Series:Parkinson's Disease
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9291713
id doaj-7f9dcecb46074e9bb43ef06b4b955f78
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7f9dcecb46074e9bb43ef06b4b955f782020-11-24T21:42:56ZengHindawi LimitedParkinson's Disease2090-80832042-00802016-01-01201610.1155/2016/92917139291713Cognitive Training in Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of Studies from 2000 to 2014Daniel Glizer0Penny A. MacDonald1MacDonald Lab, Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, CanadaMacDonald Lab, Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, CanadaCognitive deficits are prevalent among patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), in both early and late stages of the disease. These deficits are associated with lower quality of life, loss of independence, and institutionalization. To date, there is no effective pharmacological treatment for the range of cognitive impairments presented in PD. Cognitive training (CT) has been explored as an alternative approach to remediating cognition in PD. In this review we present a detailed summary of 13 studies of CT that have been conducted between 2000 and 2014 and a critical examination of the evidence for the effectiveness and applicability of CT in PD. Although the evidence shows that CT leads to short-term, moderate improvements in some cognitive functions, methodological inconsistencies weaken these results. We discuss several key limitations of the literature to date, propose methods of addressing these questions, and outline the future directions that studies of CT in PD should pursue. Studies need to provide more detail about the cognitive profile of participants, include larger sample sizes, be hypothesis driven, and be clearer about the training interventions and the outcome measures.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9291713
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel Glizer
Penny A. MacDonald
spellingShingle Daniel Glizer
Penny A. MacDonald
Cognitive Training in Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of Studies from 2000 to 2014
Parkinson's Disease
author_facet Daniel Glizer
Penny A. MacDonald
author_sort Daniel Glizer
title Cognitive Training in Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of Studies from 2000 to 2014
title_short Cognitive Training in Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of Studies from 2000 to 2014
title_full Cognitive Training in Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of Studies from 2000 to 2014
title_fullStr Cognitive Training in Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of Studies from 2000 to 2014
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive Training in Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of Studies from 2000 to 2014
title_sort cognitive training in parkinson’s disease: a review of studies from 2000 to 2014
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Parkinson's Disease
issn 2090-8083
2042-0080
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Cognitive deficits are prevalent among patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), in both early and late stages of the disease. These deficits are associated with lower quality of life, loss of independence, and institutionalization. To date, there is no effective pharmacological treatment for the range of cognitive impairments presented in PD. Cognitive training (CT) has been explored as an alternative approach to remediating cognition in PD. In this review we present a detailed summary of 13 studies of CT that have been conducted between 2000 and 2014 and a critical examination of the evidence for the effectiveness and applicability of CT in PD. Although the evidence shows that CT leads to short-term, moderate improvements in some cognitive functions, methodological inconsistencies weaken these results. We discuss several key limitations of the literature to date, propose methods of addressing these questions, and outline the future directions that studies of CT in PD should pursue. Studies need to provide more detail about the cognitive profile of participants, include larger sample sizes, be hypothesis driven, and be clearer about the training interventions and the outcome measures.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9291713
work_keys_str_mv AT danielglizer cognitivetraininginparkinsonsdiseaseareviewofstudiesfrom2000to2014
AT pennyamacdonald cognitivetraininginparkinsonsdiseaseareviewofstudiesfrom2000to2014
_version_ 1725916341906440192