Cognitive Training in Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of Studies from 2000 to 2014
Cognitive deficits are prevalent among patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), in both early and late stages of the disease. These deficits are associated with lower quality of life, loss of independence, and institutionalization. To date, there is no effective pharmacological treatment for the rang...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Parkinson's Disease |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9291713 |
id |
doaj-7f9dcecb46074e9bb43ef06b4b955f78 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7f9dcecb46074e9bb43ef06b4b955f782020-11-24T21:42:56ZengHindawi LimitedParkinson's Disease2090-80832042-00802016-01-01201610.1155/2016/92917139291713Cognitive Training in Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of Studies from 2000 to 2014Daniel Glizer0Penny A. MacDonald1MacDonald Lab, Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, CanadaMacDonald Lab, Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, CanadaCognitive deficits are prevalent among patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), in both early and late stages of the disease. These deficits are associated with lower quality of life, loss of independence, and institutionalization. To date, there is no effective pharmacological treatment for the range of cognitive impairments presented in PD. Cognitive training (CT) has been explored as an alternative approach to remediating cognition in PD. In this review we present a detailed summary of 13 studies of CT that have been conducted between 2000 and 2014 and a critical examination of the evidence for the effectiveness and applicability of CT in PD. Although the evidence shows that CT leads to short-term, moderate improvements in some cognitive functions, methodological inconsistencies weaken these results. We discuss several key limitations of the literature to date, propose methods of addressing these questions, and outline the future directions that studies of CT in PD should pursue. Studies need to provide more detail about the cognitive profile of participants, include larger sample sizes, be hypothesis driven, and be clearer about the training interventions and the outcome measures.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9291713 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Daniel Glizer Penny A. MacDonald |
spellingShingle |
Daniel Glizer Penny A. MacDonald Cognitive Training in Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of Studies from 2000 to 2014 Parkinson's Disease |
author_facet |
Daniel Glizer Penny A. MacDonald |
author_sort |
Daniel Glizer |
title |
Cognitive Training in Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of Studies from 2000 to 2014 |
title_short |
Cognitive Training in Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of Studies from 2000 to 2014 |
title_full |
Cognitive Training in Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of Studies from 2000 to 2014 |
title_fullStr |
Cognitive Training in Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of Studies from 2000 to 2014 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cognitive Training in Parkinson’s Disease: A Review of Studies from 2000 to 2014 |
title_sort |
cognitive training in parkinson’s disease: a review of studies from 2000 to 2014 |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Parkinson's Disease |
issn |
2090-8083 2042-0080 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
Cognitive deficits are prevalent among patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), in both early and late stages of the disease. These deficits are associated with lower quality of life, loss of independence, and institutionalization. To date, there is no effective pharmacological treatment for the range of cognitive impairments presented in PD. Cognitive training (CT) has been explored as an alternative approach to remediating cognition in PD. In this review we present a detailed summary of 13 studies of CT that have been conducted between 2000 and 2014 and a critical examination of the evidence for the effectiveness and applicability of CT in PD. Although the evidence shows that CT leads to short-term, moderate improvements in some cognitive functions, methodological inconsistencies weaken these results. We discuss several key limitations of the literature to date, propose methods of addressing these questions, and outline the future directions that studies of CT in PD should pursue. Studies need to provide more detail about the cognitive profile of participants, include larger sample sizes, be hypothesis driven, and be clearer about the training interventions and the outcome measures. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9291713 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT danielglizer cognitivetraininginparkinsonsdiseaseareviewofstudiesfrom2000to2014 AT pennyamacdonald cognitivetraininginparkinsonsdiseaseareviewofstudiesfrom2000to2014 |
_version_ |
1725916341906440192 |