The quantitative prevalence of creaky voice (vocal fry) in varieties of English: A systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND/AIM:It is widely believed that 'creaky voice' ('creak', 'vocal fry', 'glottal fry') is increasingly prevalent among some English speakers, particularly among young American women. Motivated by the widespread and cross-disciplinary interest in the ph...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katherine Dallaston, Gerard Docherty
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229960
id doaj-7f9900bf60c94545af03ea204d127bff
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7f9900bf60c94545af03ea204d127bff2021-03-03T21:34:40ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01153e022996010.1371/journal.pone.0229960The quantitative prevalence of creaky voice (vocal fry) in varieties of English: A systematic review of the literature.Katherine DallastonGerard DochertyBACKGROUND/AIM:It is widely believed that 'creaky voice' ('creak', 'vocal fry', 'glottal fry') is increasingly prevalent among some English speakers, particularly among young American women. Motivated by the widespread and cross-disciplinary interest in the phenomenon, this paper offers a systematic review of peer-reviewed research (up to January 2019) on the prevalence of creaky voice in varieties of English. The review aimed to understand whose and what speech has been studied, how creaky voice prevalence has been measured, and what the findings collectively reveal. METHOD:Literature was located by searching four electronic databases (ProQuest, PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science) and the proceedings of two recurrent conferences ('ICPhS' and 'SST'). Studies were included if they reported the prevalence of creaky voice in naturalistic samples of English spoken by vocally-healthy speakers. Reference lists of included studies were cross-checked. RESULTS:Only ten studies meeting inclusion criteria were identified. All studies sampled a small number of speakers and/or short durations of speech. Nine were recent studies of American-English speakers, and many of these sampled young, female, college students. Across the ten studies, creaky voice was detected using three types of methods, and prevalence was calculated using five different formulae. The findings show that prevalence varies across groups, individuals, and contexts. However, the precise nature of this variability remains unclear due to the scarcity and methodological heterogeneity of the research. CONCLUSIONS:This paper illustrated the application of systematic literature review methods in sociophonetic research-a field in which such methods are not common. The review found that creaky voice prevalence in English is not well understood, and that widespread claims of its recent increase among young American women have not been empirically confirmed. A number of specific limitations in the existing research are highlighted, which may serve as a guide for future research design.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229960
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katherine Dallaston
Gerard Docherty
spellingShingle Katherine Dallaston
Gerard Docherty
The quantitative prevalence of creaky voice (vocal fry) in varieties of English: A systematic review of the literature.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Katherine Dallaston
Gerard Docherty
author_sort Katherine Dallaston
title The quantitative prevalence of creaky voice (vocal fry) in varieties of English: A systematic review of the literature.
title_short The quantitative prevalence of creaky voice (vocal fry) in varieties of English: A systematic review of the literature.
title_full The quantitative prevalence of creaky voice (vocal fry) in varieties of English: A systematic review of the literature.
title_fullStr The quantitative prevalence of creaky voice (vocal fry) in varieties of English: A systematic review of the literature.
title_full_unstemmed The quantitative prevalence of creaky voice (vocal fry) in varieties of English: A systematic review of the literature.
title_sort quantitative prevalence of creaky voice (vocal fry) in varieties of english: a systematic review of the literature.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description BACKGROUND/AIM:It is widely believed that 'creaky voice' ('creak', 'vocal fry', 'glottal fry') is increasingly prevalent among some English speakers, particularly among young American women. Motivated by the widespread and cross-disciplinary interest in the phenomenon, this paper offers a systematic review of peer-reviewed research (up to January 2019) on the prevalence of creaky voice in varieties of English. The review aimed to understand whose and what speech has been studied, how creaky voice prevalence has been measured, and what the findings collectively reveal. METHOD:Literature was located by searching four electronic databases (ProQuest, PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science) and the proceedings of two recurrent conferences ('ICPhS' and 'SST'). Studies were included if they reported the prevalence of creaky voice in naturalistic samples of English spoken by vocally-healthy speakers. Reference lists of included studies were cross-checked. RESULTS:Only ten studies meeting inclusion criteria were identified. All studies sampled a small number of speakers and/or short durations of speech. Nine were recent studies of American-English speakers, and many of these sampled young, female, college students. Across the ten studies, creaky voice was detected using three types of methods, and prevalence was calculated using five different formulae. The findings show that prevalence varies across groups, individuals, and contexts. However, the precise nature of this variability remains unclear due to the scarcity and methodological heterogeneity of the research. CONCLUSIONS:This paper illustrated the application of systematic literature review methods in sociophonetic research-a field in which such methods are not common. The review found that creaky voice prevalence in English is not well understood, and that widespread claims of its recent increase among young American women have not been empirically confirmed. A number of specific limitations in the existing research are highlighted, which may serve as a guide for future research design.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229960
work_keys_str_mv AT katherinedallaston thequantitativeprevalenceofcreakyvoicevocalfryinvarietiesofenglishasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT gerarddocherty thequantitativeprevalenceofcreakyvoicevocalfryinvarietiesofenglishasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT katherinedallaston quantitativeprevalenceofcreakyvoicevocalfryinvarietiesofenglishasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT gerarddocherty quantitativeprevalenceofcreakyvoicevocalfryinvarietiesofenglishasystematicreviewoftheliterature
_version_ 1714816271095169024