Investigation of the transferability of hydrological models and a method to improve model calibration

In order to find a model parameterization such that the hydrological model performs well even under different conditions, appropriate model performance measures have to be determined. A common performance measure is the Nash Sutcliffe efficiency. Usually it is calculated comparing observed and model...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. Hartmann, A. Bárdossy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2005-01-01
Series:Advances in Geosciences
Online Access:http://www.adv-geosci.net/5/83/2005/adgeo-5-83-2005.pdf
id doaj-7f935f75fb434f3db854fc0e1249a55e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7f935f75fb434f3db854fc0e1249a55e2020-11-24T23:44:50ZengCopernicus PublicationsAdvances in Geosciences1680-73401680-73592005-01-0158387Investigation of the transferability of hydrological models and a method to improve model calibrationG. HartmannA. BárdossyIn order to find a model parameterization such that the hydrological model performs well even under different conditions, appropriate model performance measures have to be determined. A common performance measure is the Nash Sutcliffe efficiency. Usually it is calculated comparing observed and modelled daily values. In this paper a modified version is suggested in order to calibrate a model on different time scales simultaneously (days up to years). A spatially distributed hydrological model based on HBV concept was used. The modelling was applied on the Upper Neckar catchment, a mesoscale river in south western Germany with a basin size of about 4000 km<sup>2</sup>. The observation period 1961-1990 was divided into four different climatic periods, referred to as &quot;warm&quot;, &quot;cold&quot;, &quot;wet&quot; and &quot;dry&quot;. These sub periods were used to assess the transferability of the model calibration and of the measure of performance. In a first step, the hydrological model was calibrated on a certain period and afterwards applied on the same period. Then, a validation was performed on the climatologically opposite period than the calibration, e.g. the model calibrated on the cold period was applied on the warm period. Optimal parameter sets were identified by an automatic calibration procedure based on Simulated Annealing. The results show, that calibrating a hydrological model that is supposed to handle short as well as long term signals becomes an important task. Especially the objective function has to be chosen very carefully.http://www.adv-geosci.net/5/83/2005/adgeo-5-83-2005.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author G. Hartmann
A. Bárdossy
spellingShingle G. Hartmann
A. Bárdossy
Investigation of the transferability of hydrological models and a method to improve model calibration
Advances in Geosciences
author_facet G. Hartmann
A. Bárdossy
author_sort G. Hartmann
title Investigation of the transferability of hydrological models and a method to improve model calibration
title_short Investigation of the transferability of hydrological models and a method to improve model calibration
title_full Investigation of the transferability of hydrological models and a method to improve model calibration
title_fullStr Investigation of the transferability of hydrological models and a method to improve model calibration
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of the transferability of hydrological models and a method to improve model calibration
title_sort investigation of the transferability of hydrological models and a method to improve model calibration
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Advances in Geosciences
issn 1680-7340
1680-7359
publishDate 2005-01-01
description In order to find a model parameterization such that the hydrological model performs well even under different conditions, appropriate model performance measures have to be determined. A common performance measure is the Nash Sutcliffe efficiency. Usually it is calculated comparing observed and modelled daily values. In this paper a modified version is suggested in order to calibrate a model on different time scales simultaneously (days up to years). A spatially distributed hydrological model based on HBV concept was used. The modelling was applied on the Upper Neckar catchment, a mesoscale river in south western Germany with a basin size of about 4000 km<sup>2</sup>. The observation period 1961-1990 was divided into four different climatic periods, referred to as &quot;warm&quot;, &quot;cold&quot;, &quot;wet&quot; and &quot;dry&quot;. These sub periods were used to assess the transferability of the model calibration and of the measure of performance. In a first step, the hydrological model was calibrated on a certain period and afterwards applied on the same period. Then, a validation was performed on the climatologically opposite period than the calibration, e.g. the model calibrated on the cold period was applied on the warm period. Optimal parameter sets were identified by an automatic calibration procedure based on Simulated Annealing. The results show, that calibrating a hydrological model that is supposed to handle short as well as long term signals becomes an important task. Especially the objective function has to be chosen very carefully.
url http://www.adv-geosci.net/5/83/2005/adgeo-5-83-2005.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ghartmann investigationofthetransferabilityofhydrologicalmodelsandamethodtoimprovemodelcalibration
AT abardossy investigationofthetransferabilityofhydrologicalmodelsandamethodtoimprovemodelcalibration
_version_ 1725498273440989184