Task demands affect spatial reference frame weighting during tactile localization in sighted and congenitally blind adults.

Task demands modulate tactile localization in sighted humans, presumably through weight adjustments in the spatial integration of anatomical, skin-based, and external, posture-based information. In contrast, previous studies have suggested that congenitally blind humans, by default, refrain from aut...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonathan T W Schubert, Stephanie Badde, Brigitte Röder, Tobias Heed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5724835?pdf=render
id doaj-7f8c96d9116c4e20a5d1330d7c2e4f78
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7f8c96d9116c4e20a5d1330d7c2e4f782020-11-24T21:47:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-011212e018906710.1371/journal.pone.0189067Task demands affect spatial reference frame weighting during tactile localization in sighted and congenitally blind adults.Jonathan T W SchubertStephanie BaddeBrigitte RöderTobias HeedTask demands modulate tactile localization in sighted humans, presumably through weight adjustments in the spatial integration of anatomical, skin-based, and external, posture-based information. In contrast, previous studies have suggested that congenitally blind humans, by default, refrain from automatic spatial integration and localize touch using only skin-based information. Here, sighted and congenitally blind participants localized tactile targets on the palm or back of one hand, while ignoring simultaneous tactile distractors at congruent or incongruent locations on the other hand. We probed the interplay of anatomical and external location codes for spatial congruency effects by varying hand posture: the palms either both faced down, or one faced down and one up. In the latter posture, externally congruent target and distractor locations were anatomically incongruent and vice versa. Target locations had to be reported either anatomically ("palm" or "back" of the hand), or externally ("up" or "down" in space). Under anatomical instructions, performance was more accurate for anatomically congruent than incongruent target-distractor pairs. In contrast, under external instructions, performance was more accurate for externally congruent than incongruent pairs. These modulations were evident in sighted and blind individuals. Notably, distractor effects were overall far smaller in blind than in sighted participants, despite comparable target-distractor identification performance. Thus, the absence of developmental vision seems to be associated with an increased ability to focus tactile attention towards a non-spatially defined target. Nevertheless, that blind individuals exhibited effects of hand posture and task instructions in their congruency effects suggests that, like the sighted, they automatically integrate anatomical and external information during tactile localization. Moreover, spatial integration in tactile processing is, thus, flexibly adapted by top-down information-here, task instruction-even in the absence of developmental vision.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5724835?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jonathan T W Schubert
Stephanie Badde
Brigitte Röder
Tobias Heed
spellingShingle Jonathan T W Schubert
Stephanie Badde
Brigitte Röder
Tobias Heed
Task demands affect spatial reference frame weighting during tactile localization in sighted and congenitally blind adults.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jonathan T W Schubert
Stephanie Badde
Brigitte Röder
Tobias Heed
author_sort Jonathan T W Schubert
title Task demands affect spatial reference frame weighting during tactile localization in sighted and congenitally blind adults.
title_short Task demands affect spatial reference frame weighting during tactile localization in sighted and congenitally blind adults.
title_full Task demands affect spatial reference frame weighting during tactile localization in sighted and congenitally blind adults.
title_fullStr Task demands affect spatial reference frame weighting during tactile localization in sighted and congenitally blind adults.
title_full_unstemmed Task demands affect spatial reference frame weighting during tactile localization in sighted and congenitally blind adults.
title_sort task demands affect spatial reference frame weighting during tactile localization in sighted and congenitally blind adults.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Task demands modulate tactile localization in sighted humans, presumably through weight adjustments in the spatial integration of anatomical, skin-based, and external, posture-based information. In contrast, previous studies have suggested that congenitally blind humans, by default, refrain from automatic spatial integration and localize touch using only skin-based information. Here, sighted and congenitally blind participants localized tactile targets on the palm or back of one hand, while ignoring simultaneous tactile distractors at congruent or incongruent locations on the other hand. We probed the interplay of anatomical and external location codes for spatial congruency effects by varying hand posture: the palms either both faced down, or one faced down and one up. In the latter posture, externally congruent target and distractor locations were anatomically incongruent and vice versa. Target locations had to be reported either anatomically ("palm" or "back" of the hand), or externally ("up" or "down" in space). Under anatomical instructions, performance was more accurate for anatomically congruent than incongruent target-distractor pairs. In contrast, under external instructions, performance was more accurate for externally congruent than incongruent pairs. These modulations were evident in sighted and blind individuals. Notably, distractor effects were overall far smaller in blind than in sighted participants, despite comparable target-distractor identification performance. Thus, the absence of developmental vision seems to be associated with an increased ability to focus tactile attention towards a non-spatially defined target. Nevertheless, that blind individuals exhibited effects of hand posture and task instructions in their congruency effects suggests that, like the sighted, they automatically integrate anatomical and external information during tactile localization. Moreover, spatial integration in tactile processing is, thus, flexibly adapted by top-down information-here, task instruction-even in the absence of developmental vision.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5724835?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathantwschubert taskdemandsaffectspatialreferenceframeweightingduringtactilelocalizationinsightedandcongenitallyblindadults
AT stephaniebadde taskdemandsaffectspatialreferenceframeweightingduringtactilelocalizationinsightedandcongenitallyblindadults
AT brigitteroder taskdemandsaffectspatialreferenceframeweightingduringtactilelocalizationinsightedandcongenitallyblindadults
AT tobiasheed taskdemandsaffectspatialreferenceframeweightingduringtactilelocalizationinsightedandcongenitallyblindadults
_version_ 1725894417355636736