Radiation Boost After Adjuvant Whole Breast Radiotherapy: Does Evidence Support Practice for Close Margin and Altered Fractionation?

Adding a boost to whole breast radiation (WBI) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) may help improve local control, but it increases the total cost of treatment and may worsen cosmetic outcomes. Therefore, it is reserved for patients whose potential benefit outweighs the risks; however, current...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephanie Gulstene, Hamid Raziee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00772/full
id doaj-7f67b892f9c84b3c9f203b74df2b1f99
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7f67b892f9c84b3c9f203b74df2b1f992020-11-25T03:23:11ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2020-06-011010.3389/fonc.2020.00772528239Radiation Boost After Adjuvant Whole Breast Radiotherapy: Does Evidence Support Practice for Close Margin and Altered Fractionation?Stephanie Gulstene0Hamid Raziee1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, CanadaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Surrey, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CanadaAdding a boost to whole breast radiation (WBI) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) may help improve local control, but it increases the total cost of treatment and may worsen cosmetic outcomes. Therefore, it is reserved for patients whose potential benefit outweighs the risks; however, current evidence is insufficient to support comprehensive and consistent guidance on how to identify these patients, leading to a potential for significant variations in practice. The use of a boost in the setting of close margins and hypofractionated radiotherapy represents two important areas where consensus guidelines, patterns of practice, and current evidence do not seem to converge. Close margins were previously routinely re-excised, but this is no longer felt to be necessary. Because of this recent practice change, good long-term data on the local recurrence risk of close margins with or without a boost is lacking. As for hypofractionation, although there is guidance recommending that the decision to add a boost be independent from the whole-breast fractionation schedule, it appears that patterns-of-practice data may show underutilization of a boost when hypofractionation is used. The use of a boost in these two common clinical scenarios represents important areas of future study for the optimization of adjuvant breast radiation.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00772/fullboost radiationhypofractionatedclose marginsradiation therapy (radiotherapy)breast cancerbreast malignancy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephanie Gulstene
Hamid Raziee
spellingShingle Stephanie Gulstene
Hamid Raziee
Radiation Boost After Adjuvant Whole Breast Radiotherapy: Does Evidence Support Practice for Close Margin and Altered Fractionation?
Frontiers in Oncology
boost radiation
hypofractionated
close margins
radiation therapy (radiotherapy)
breast cancer
breast malignancy
author_facet Stephanie Gulstene
Hamid Raziee
author_sort Stephanie Gulstene
title Radiation Boost After Adjuvant Whole Breast Radiotherapy: Does Evidence Support Practice for Close Margin and Altered Fractionation?
title_short Radiation Boost After Adjuvant Whole Breast Radiotherapy: Does Evidence Support Practice for Close Margin and Altered Fractionation?
title_full Radiation Boost After Adjuvant Whole Breast Radiotherapy: Does Evidence Support Practice for Close Margin and Altered Fractionation?
title_fullStr Radiation Boost After Adjuvant Whole Breast Radiotherapy: Does Evidence Support Practice for Close Margin and Altered Fractionation?
title_full_unstemmed Radiation Boost After Adjuvant Whole Breast Radiotherapy: Does Evidence Support Practice for Close Margin and Altered Fractionation?
title_sort radiation boost after adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy: does evidence support practice for close margin and altered fractionation?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Oncology
issn 2234-943X
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Adding a boost to whole breast radiation (WBI) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) may help improve local control, but it increases the total cost of treatment and may worsen cosmetic outcomes. Therefore, it is reserved for patients whose potential benefit outweighs the risks; however, current evidence is insufficient to support comprehensive and consistent guidance on how to identify these patients, leading to a potential for significant variations in practice. The use of a boost in the setting of close margins and hypofractionated radiotherapy represents two important areas where consensus guidelines, patterns of practice, and current evidence do not seem to converge. Close margins were previously routinely re-excised, but this is no longer felt to be necessary. Because of this recent practice change, good long-term data on the local recurrence risk of close margins with or without a boost is lacking. As for hypofractionation, although there is guidance recommending that the decision to add a boost be independent from the whole-breast fractionation schedule, it appears that patterns-of-practice data may show underutilization of a boost when hypofractionation is used. The use of a boost in these two common clinical scenarios represents important areas of future study for the optimization of adjuvant breast radiation.
topic boost radiation
hypofractionated
close margins
radiation therapy (radiotherapy)
breast cancer
breast malignancy
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.00772/full
work_keys_str_mv AT stephaniegulstene radiationboostafteradjuvantwholebreastradiotherapydoesevidencesupportpracticeforclosemarginandalteredfractionation
AT hamidraziee radiationboostafteradjuvantwholebreastradiotherapydoesevidencesupportpracticeforclosemarginandalteredfractionation
_version_ 1724607144422014976