Evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the Dutch version of the Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): A mixed methods study.

<h4>Background</h4>The recently developed Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS) revealed particularly strong social exclusion in non-Western immigrant groups compared to the native Dutch population. To qualify such results, cross-cultural validation of the SEI-HS in non-West...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Addi P L van Bergen, Annelies van Loon, Matty A S de Wit, Stella J M Hoff, Judith R L M Wolf, Albert M van Hemert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224687
id doaj-7f45fd8e12d447d3812d73be18b41d1b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7f45fd8e12d447d3812d73be18b41d1b2021-03-04T10:23:33ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-011411e022468710.1371/journal.pone.0224687Evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the Dutch version of the Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): A mixed methods study.Addi P L van BergenAnnelies van LoonMatty A S de WitStella J M HoffJudith R L M WolfAlbert M van Hemert<h4>Background</h4>The recently developed Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS) revealed particularly strong social exclusion in non-Western immigrant groups compared to the native Dutch population. To qualify such results, cross-cultural validation of the SEI-HS in non-Western immigrant groups is called for.<h4>Methods</h4>A sequential explanatory mixed methods design was used, employing quantitative data from the Netherlands Public Health Monitor along with qualitative interviews. Data from 1,803 adults aged 19 years or older of Surinamese, 1,009 of Moroccan and 1,164 of Turkish background and 19,318 native Dutch living in the four largest cities in the Netherlands were used to test the factorial structure of the SEI-HS and differential item functioning across immigrant groups. Additionally, 52 respondents with a high score on the SEI-HS and from different background were interviewed on the item content of the SEI-HS and subjective feelings of exclusion. For each SEI-HS item the semantic, conceptual and contextual connotations were coded and compared between the immigrant groups and native Dutch.<h4>Results</h4>High levels of social exclusion were found in 20.0% of the urban population of Surinamese origin, 20.9% of Moroccan, 28.7% of Turkish and 4.2% of native Dutch origin. The 4-factor structure of the SEI-HS was confirmed in all three immigrant groups. None of the items demonstrated substantial differential item functioning in relation to immigration background. The interviews uncovered some methodological shortcomings, but these did not substantially impact the observed excess of social exclusion in immigrant groups.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The present study provides evidence in support of the validity of the SEI-HS in adults of Surinamese, Moroccan and Turkish background and confirms the major social exclusion of these immigrant groups in the main cities in the Netherlands. Policy measures to enhance social inclusion and reduce exclusion are urgently needed.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224687
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Addi P L van Bergen
Annelies van Loon
Matty A S de Wit
Stella J M Hoff
Judith R L M Wolf
Albert M van Hemert
spellingShingle Addi P L van Bergen
Annelies van Loon
Matty A S de Wit
Stella J M Hoff
Judith R L M Wolf
Albert M van Hemert
Evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the Dutch version of the Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): A mixed methods study.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Addi P L van Bergen
Annelies van Loon
Matty A S de Wit
Stella J M Hoff
Judith R L M Wolf
Albert M van Hemert
author_sort Addi P L van Bergen
title Evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the Dutch version of the Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): A mixed methods study.
title_short Evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the Dutch version of the Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): A mixed methods study.
title_full Evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the Dutch version of the Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): A mixed methods study.
title_fullStr Evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the Dutch version of the Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): A mixed methods study.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the Dutch version of the Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): A mixed methods study.
title_sort evaluating the cross-cultural validity of the dutch version of the social exclusion index for health surveys (sei-hs): a mixed methods study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description <h4>Background</h4>The recently developed Social Exclusion Index for Health Surveys (SEI-HS) revealed particularly strong social exclusion in non-Western immigrant groups compared to the native Dutch population. To qualify such results, cross-cultural validation of the SEI-HS in non-Western immigrant groups is called for.<h4>Methods</h4>A sequential explanatory mixed methods design was used, employing quantitative data from the Netherlands Public Health Monitor along with qualitative interviews. Data from 1,803 adults aged 19 years or older of Surinamese, 1,009 of Moroccan and 1,164 of Turkish background and 19,318 native Dutch living in the four largest cities in the Netherlands were used to test the factorial structure of the SEI-HS and differential item functioning across immigrant groups. Additionally, 52 respondents with a high score on the SEI-HS and from different background were interviewed on the item content of the SEI-HS and subjective feelings of exclusion. For each SEI-HS item the semantic, conceptual and contextual connotations were coded and compared between the immigrant groups and native Dutch.<h4>Results</h4>High levels of social exclusion were found in 20.0% of the urban population of Surinamese origin, 20.9% of Moroccan, 28.7% of Turkish and 4.2% of native Dutch origin. The 4-factor structure of the SEI-HS was confirmed in all three immigrant groups. None of the items demonstrated substantial differential item functioning in relation to immigration background. The interviews uncovered some methodological shortcomings, but these did not substantially impact the observed excess of social exclusion in immigrant groups.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The present study provides evidence in support of the validity of the SEI-HS in adults of Surinamese, Moroccan and Turkish background and confirms the major social exclusion of these immigrant groups in the main cities in the Netherlands. Policy measures to enhance social inclusion and reduce exclusion are urgently needed.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224687
work_keys_str_mv AT addiplvanbergen evaluatingthecrossculturalvalidityofthedutchversionofthesocialexclusionindexforhealthsurveysseihsamixedmethodsstudy
AT anneliesvanloon evaluatingthecrossculturalvalidityofthedutchversionofthesocialexclusionindexforhealthsurveysseihsamixedmethodsstudy
AT mattyasdewit evaluatingthecrossculturalvalidityofthedutchversionofthesocialexclusionindexforhealthsurveysseihsamixedmethodsstudy
AT stellajmhoff evaluatingthecrossculturalvalidityofthedutchversionofthesocialexclusionindexforhealthsurveysseihsamixedmethodsstudy
AT judithrlmwolf evaluatingthecrossculturalvalidityofthedutchversionofthesocialexclusionindexforhealthsurveysseihsamixedmethodsstudy
AT albertmvanhemert evaluatingthecrossculturalvalidityofthedutchversionofthesocialexclusionindexforhealthsurveysseihsamixedmethodsstudy
_version_ 1714806333634510848