VERIFICATION OF ELASTOMERIC BEARINGS FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS IN CALCULATING SOFTWARE PACKAGES

Introduction. While designing buildings and constructions with an elastomeric bearing with a lead core as a seismic isolation system, it is necessary to make calculations concerning effectiveness and reasonability of its usage. These demands lead to necessity to construct bearings in a common finite...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oleg V. Mkrtychev, Artem A. Bunov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU) 2018-12-01
Series:Stroitel’stvo: Nauka i Obrazovanie
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.nso-journal.ru/public/journals/1/issues/2018/04/04_04_2018.pdf
id doaj-7f30458d7ed549d8a31950bfa558efeb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7f30458d7ed549d8a31950bfa558efeb2020-11-24T21:48:33ZengMoscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU)Stroitel’stvo: Nauka i Obrazovanie2305-55022018-12-01844410.22227/2305-5502.2018.4.4VERIFICATION OF ELASTOMERIC BEARINGS FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS IN CALCULATING SOFTWARE PACKAGESOleg V. Mkrtychev0Artem A. Bunov1Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University) (MGSU)Introduction. While designing buildings and constructions with an elastomeric bearing with a lead core as a seismic isolation system, it is necessary to make calculations concerning effectiveness and reasonability of its usage. These demands lead to necessity to construct bearings in a common finite-element model, in order to consider how a bearing and a construction work together. Though a calculator has a lot of different variants of elastomeric bearing’s construction, which are connected to their implemented work model. To prove that obtained calculation results are sufficient and accurate, selection criteria of elastomeric bearings implemented work models are necessary. Materials and methods. To get accurate results we will compare elastomeric bearing’s work diagrams and free periods of motion when there are different variants of their numerical modelling with the help of software packages with factory tests results. Results. The researches have shown that lateral force’s and shear’s limit values are the same for all of the observed cases, although free periods of motion and work diagrams differ. Usage of more accurate bearing work model in software package Ansys/LS-Dyna can explain these differences, it can be seen if compare their work’s diagrams. Conclusions. Analysis of constructions with elastomeric bearings’ work, which function according to the idealized linear model, can be possible only for II level constructions. Idealized nonlinear models should be used for I level constructions.http://www.nso-journal.ru/public/journals/1/issues/2018/04/04_04_2018.pdfseismic isolationelastomeric bearingseismic influencelinearly-spectral methoddirect dynamic methodan idealized linear modelan idealized nonlinear modeldiagramfull-scale experiments
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Oleg V. Mkrtychev
Artem A. Bunov
spellingShingle Oleg V. Mkrtychev
Artem A. Bunov
VERIFICATION OF ELASTOMERIC BEARINGS FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS IN CALCULATING SOFTWARE PACKAGES
Stroitel’stvo: Nauka i Obrazovanie
seismic isolation
elastomeric bearing
seismic influence
linearly-spectral method
direct dynamic method
an idealized linear model
an idealized nonlinear model
diagram
full-scale experiments
author_facet Oleg V. Mkrtychev
Artem A. Bunov
author_sort Oleg V. Mkrtychev
title VERIFICATION OF ELASTOMERIC BEARINGS FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS IN CALCULATING SOFTWARE PACKAGES
title_short VERIFICATION OF ELASTOMERIC BEARINGS FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS IN CALCULATING SOFTWARE PACKAGES
title_full VERIFICATION OF ELASTOMERIC BEARINGS FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS IN CALCULATING SOFTWARE PACKAGES
title_fullStr VERIFICATION OF ELASTOMERIC BEARINGS FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS IN CALCULATING SOFTWARE PACKAGES
title_full_unstemmed VERIFICATION OF ELASTOMERIC BEARINGS FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS IN CALCULATING SOFTWARE PACKAGES
title_sort verification of elastomeric bearings finite-element models in calculating software packages
publisher Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU)
series Stroitel’stvo: Nauka i Obrazovanie
issn 2305-5502
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Introduction. While designing buildings and constructions with an elastomeric bearing with a lead core as a seismic isolation system, it is necessary to make calculations concerning effectiveness and reasonability of its usage. These demands lead to necessity to construct bearings in a common finite-element model, in order to consider how a bearing and a construction work together. Though a calculator has a lot of different variants of elastomeric bearing’s construction, which are connected to their implemented work model. To prove that obtained calculation results are sufficient and accurate, selection criteria of elastomeric bearings implemented work models are necessary. Materials and methods. To get accurate results we will compare elastomeric bearing’s work diagrams and free periods of motion when there are different variants of their numerical modelling with the help of software packages with factory tests results. Results. The researches have shown that lateral force’s and shear’s limit values are the same for all of the observed cases, although free periods of motion and work diagrams differ. Usage of more accurate bearing work model in software package Ansys/LS-Dyna can explain these differences, it can be seen if compare their work’s diagrams. Conclusions. Analysis of constructions with elastomeric bearings’ work, which function according to the idealized linear model, can be possible only for II level constructions. Idealized nonlinear models should be used for I level constructions.
topic seismic isolation
elastomeric bearing
seismic influence
linearly-spectral method
direct dynamic method
an idealized linear model
an idealized nonlinear model
diagram
full-scale experiments
url http://www.nso-journal.ru/public/journals/1/issues/2018/04/04_04_2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT olegvmkrtychev verificationofelastomericbearingsfiniteelementmodelsincalculatingsoftwarepackages
AT artemabunov verificationofelastomericbearingsfiniteelementmodelsincalculatingsoftwarepackages
_version_ 1725891609667567616