Flash Electroretinography and Pattern Visual Evoked Potential Changes in Ocular Hypertension Patients

Purpose. To evaluate the changes of flash electroretinography (fERG) and pattern visual evoked potentials (pVEP) in ocular hypertension (OHT) patients. Methods. Twenty-five OHT patients and 30 healthy volunteers were enrolled for this cross-sectional study. Opthalmologic examinations, visual field t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ercüment Çavdar, Abdullah Ozkaya, Burcu Alper
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/908017
id doaj-7f240daacc0e4bbc8d619ebb1609a0f8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7f240daacc0e4bbc8d619ebb1609a0f82020-11-24T23:28:18ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582013-01-01201310.1155/2013/908017908017Flash Electroretinography and Pattern Visual Evoked Potential Changes in Ocular Hypertension PatientsErcüment Çavdar0Abdullah Ozkaya1Burcu Alper2Kemalpaşa State Hospital, Clinic of Ophthalmology, 35730 Izmir, TurkeyBeyoğlu Eye Training and Research Hospital, 34421 Istanbul, TurkeySalihli State Hospital, Clinic of Ophthalmology, 45310 Manisa, TurkeyPurpose. To evaluate the changes of flash electroretinography (fERG) and pattern visual evoked potentials (pVEP) in ocular hypertension (OHT) patients. Methods. Twenty-five OHT patients and 30 healthy volunteers were enrolled for this cross-sectional study. Opthalmologic examinations, visual field tests, pVEP and fERG were performed. The main outcome measures were the differences between pVEP and fERG parameters. Results. The mean age of OHT patients and volunteers were 57 ± 12.25 years (range 30–65 years), and 53.25 ± 12.0 years (range 30–65 years), respectively. The mean amplitude of the pVEP was statistically lower in the OHT group (P < 0.05). Latency of the two groups was different; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In fERG of OHT group, there was a significant decrease in the amplitude of the oscillatory potentials (Ops), and a significant delay in latency of rod and cone waves (all P < 0.05). There was no significant change in the flicker fERG waves between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions. Although we found a decrease in Ops amplitude and a prolonged latency in flicker fERG, only the decrease in Ops amplitude was statistically significant between the two groups. The amplitude of Ops wave and amplitude of pVEP may reflect early glaucomatous damage in OHT patients.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/908017
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ercüment Çavdar
Abdullah Ozkaya
Burcu Alper
spellingShingle Ercüment Çavdar
Abdullah Ozkaya
Burcu Alper
Flash Electroretinography and Pattern Visual Evoked Potential Changes in Ocular Hypertension Patients
Journal of Ophthalmology
author_facet Ercüment Çavdar
Abdullah Ozkaya
Burcu Alper
author_sort Ercüment Çavdar
title Flash Electroretinography and Pattern Visual Evoked Potential Changes in Ocular Hypertension Patients
title_short Flash Electroretinography and Pattern Visual Evoked Potential Changes in Ocular Hypertension Patients
title_full Flash Electroretinography and Pattern Visual Evoked Potential Changes in Ocular Hypertension Patients
title_fullStr Flash Electroretinography and Pattern Visual Evoked Potential Changes in Ocular Hypertension Patients
title_full_unstemmed Flash Electroretinography and Pattern Visual Evoked Potential Changes in Ocular Hypertension Patients
title_sort flash electroretinography and pattern visual evoked potential changes in ocular hypertension patients
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Purpose. To evaluate the changes of flash electroretinography (fERG) and pattern visual evoked potentials (pVEP) in ocular hypertension (OHT) patients. Methods. Twenty-five OHT patients and 30 healthy volunteers were enrolled for this cross-sectional study. Opthalmologic examinations, visual field tests, pVEP and fERG were performed. The main outcome measures were the differences between pVEP and fERG parameters. Results. The mean age of OHT patients and volunteers were 57 ± 12.25 years (range 30–65 years), and 53.25 ± 12.0 years (range 30–65 years), respectively. The mean amplitude of the pVEP was statistically lower in the OHT group (P < 0.05). Latency of the two groups was different; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In fERG of OHT group, there was a significant decrease in the amplitude of the oscillatory potentials (Ops), and a significant delay in latency of rod and cone waves (all P < 0.05). There was no significant change in the flicker fERG waves between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions. Although we found a decrease in Ops amplitude and a prolonged latency in flicker fERG, only the decrease in Ops amplitude was statistically significant between the two groups. The amplitude of Ops wave and amplitude of pVEP may reflect early glaucomatous damage in OHT patients.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/908017
work_keys_str_mv AT ercumentcavdar flashelectroretinographyandpatternvisualevokedpotentialchangesinocularhypertensionpatients
AT abdullahozkaya flashelectroretinographyandpatternvisualevokedpotentialchangesinocularhypertensionpatients
AT burcualper flashelectroretinographyandpatternvisualevokedpotentialchangesinocularhypertensionpatients
_version_ 1725549888828080128