Comparison of inversion methods in seismic tomography: application to tectonic structures in Northwestern Italy

In this paper we apply various inversion methods to a set of teleseismic data collected by a network operating along the Ligurian Belt in the transition region between Alps and Apennines. In particular, we consider the regularization method, the truncated singular value decomposition, the Landweber...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Eva, M. Cattaneo, M. Bertero, F. Malfanti, F. Maggio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) 1994-06-01
Series:Annals of Geophysics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/4234
id doaj-7f22c9e5ca4d4d66a3780e67c8da7000
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7f22c9e5ca4d4d66a3780e67c8da70002020-11-25T01:37:12ZengIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)Annals of Geophysics1593-52132037-416X1994-06-0137110.4401/ag-4234Comparison of inversion methods in seismic tomography: application to tectonic structures in Northwestern ItalyC. EvaM. CattaneoM. BerteroF. MalfantiF. MaggioIn this paper we apply various inversion methods to a set of teleseismic data collected by a network operating along the Ligurian Belt in the transition region between Alps and Apennines. In particular, we consider the regularization method, the truncated singular value decomposition, the Landweber method (with the Related Simultaneous Iterative Reconstruction Technique) and the conjugate gradient method. All the methods provide rather similar velocity models which are well approximated by that provided by back-projection (used with an appropriate normalization constant). A drawback of these models seems to be the large discrepancy (of the order of 40%) between the observed time residuals and those computed from the model itself. However, for each station of the network, the azimuth dependence of the computed time residuals reproduces rather well the observed one so that it is believable that the most significant information contained in the data has been expIoited. The computed velocity models indicate strong heterogeneities in the first 200 km below the Apennines.http://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/4234seismic tomographytectonic structuresNorthwestern Italy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author C. Eva
M. Cattaneo
M. Bertero
F. Malfanti
F. Maggio
spellingShingle C. Eva
M. Cattaneo
M. Bertero
F. Malfanti
F. Maggio
Comparison of inversion methods in seismic tomography: application to tectonic structures in Northwestern Italy
Annals of Geophysics
seismic tomography
tectonic structures
Northwestern Italy
author_facet C. Eva
M. Cattaneo
M. Bertero
F. Malfanti
F. Maggio
author_sort C. Eva
title Comparison of inversion methods in seismic tomography: application to tectonic structures in Northwestern Italy
title_short Comparison of inversion methods in seismic tomography: application to tectonic structures in Northwestern Italy
title_full Comparison of inversion methods in seismic tomography: application to tectonic structures in Northwestern Italy
title_fullStr Comparison of inversion methods in seismic tomography: application to tectonic structures in Northwestern Italy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of inversion methods in seismic tomography: application to tectonic structures in Northwestern Italy
title_sort comparison of inversion methods in seismic tomography: application to tectonic structures in northwestern italy
publisher Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)
series Annals of Geophysics
issn 1593-5213
2037-416X
publishDate 1994-06-01
description In this paper we apply various inversion methods to a set of teleseismic data collected by a network operating along the Ligurian Belt in the transition region between Alps and Apennines. In particular, we consider the regularization method, the truncated singular value decomposition, the Landweber method (with the Related Simultaneous Iterative Reconstruction Technique) and the conjugate gradient method. All the methods provide rather similar velocity models which are well approximated by that provided by back-projection (used with an appropriate normalization constant). A drawback of these models seems to be the large discrepancy (of the order of 40%) between the observed time residuals and those computed from the model itself. However, for each station of the network, the azimuth dependence of the computed time residuals reproduces rather well the observed one so that it is believable that the most significant information contained in the data has been expIoited. The computed velocity models indicate strong heterogeneities in the first 200 km below the Apennines.
topic seismic tomography
tectonic structures
Northwestern Italy
url http://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/4234
work_keys_str_mv AT ceva comparisonofinversionmethodsinseismictomographyapplicationtotectonicstructuresinnorthwesternitaly
AT mcattaneo comparisonofinversionmethodsinseismictomographyapplicationtotectonicstructuresinnorthwesternitaly
AT mbertero comparisonofinversionmethodsinseismictomographyapplicationtotectonicstructuresinnorthwesternitaly
AT fmalfanti comparisonofinversionmethodsinseismictomographyapplicationtotectonicstructuresinnorthwesternitaly
AT fmaggio comparisonofinversionmethodsinseismictomographyapplicationtotectonicstructuresinnorthwesternitaly
_version_ 1725059105495711744