Rhythmic Recursion? Human Sensitivity to a Lindenmayer Grammar with Self-similar Structure in a Musical Task

Processing of recursion has been proposed as the foundation of human linguistic ability. Yet this ability may be shared with other domains, such as the musical or rhythmic domain. Lindenmayer grammars (L-systems) have been proposed as a recursive grammar for use in artificial grammar experiments to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreea Geambaşu, Laura Toron, Andrea Ravignani, Clara C. Levelt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-08-01
Series:Music & Science
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204320946615
id doaj-7f1bc429074a422faf68250b6c7aacc0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7f1bc429074a422faf68250b6c7aacc02020-11-25T03:35:33ZengSAGE PublishingMusic & Science2059-20432020-08-01310.1177/2059204320946615Rhythmic Recursion? Human Sensitivity to a Lindenmayer Grammar with Self-similar Structure in a Musical TaskAndreea Geambaşu0Laura Toron1Andrea Ravignani2Clara C. Levelt3 , Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands , Nijmegen, The Netherlands Comparative Bioacoustics Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands , Leiden University, Leiden, The NetherlandsProcessing of recursion has been proposed as the foundation of human linguistic ability. Yet this ability may be shared with other domains, such as the musical or rhythmic domain. Lindenmayer grammars (L-systems) have been proposed as a recursive grammar for use in artificial grammar experiments to test recursive processing abilities, and previous work had shown that participants are able to learn such a grammar using linguistic stimuli (syllables). In the present work, we used two experimental paradigms (a yes/no task and a two-alternative forced choice) to test whether adult participants are able to learn a recursive Lindenmayer grammar composed of drum sounds. After a brief exposure phase, we found that participants at the group level were sensitive to the exposure grammar and capable of distinguishing the grammatical and ungrammatical test strings above chance level in both tasks. While we found evidence of participants’ sensitivity to a very complex L-system grammar in a non-linguistic, potentially musical domain, the results were not robust. We discuss the discrepancy within our results and with the previous literature using L-systems in the linguistic domain. Furthermore, we propose directions for future music cognition research using L-system grammars.https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204320946615
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andreea Geambaşu
Laura Toron
Andrea Ravignani
Clara C. Levelt
spellingShingle Andreea Geambaşu
Laura Toron
Andrea Ravignani
Clara C. Levelt
Rhythmic Recursion? Human Sensitivity to a Lindenmayer Grammar with Self-similar Structure in a Musical Task
Music & Science
author_facet Andreea Geambaşu
Laura Toron
Andrea Ravignani
Clara C. Levelt
author_sort Andreea Geambaşu
title Rhythmic Recursion? Human Sensitivity to a Lindenmayer Grammar with Self-similar Structure in a Musical Task
title_short Rhythmic Recursion? Human Sensitivity to a Lindenmayer Grammar with Self-similar Structure in a Musical Task
title_full Rhythmic Recursion? Human Sensitivity to a Lindenmayer Grammar with Self-similar Structure in a Musical Task
title_fullStr Rhythmic Recursion? Human Sensitivity to a Lindenmayer Grammar with Self-similar Structure in a Musical Task
title_full_unstemmed Rhythmic Recursion? Human Sensitivity to a Lindenmayer Grammar with Self-similar Structure in a Musical Task
title_sort rhythmic recursion? human sensitivity to a lindenmayer grammar with self-similar structure in a musical task
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Music & Science
issn 2059-2043
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Processing of recursion has been proposed as the foundation of human linguistic ability. Yet this ability may be shared with other domains, such as the musical or rhythmic domain. Lindenmayer grammars (L-systems) have been proposed as a recursive grammar for use in artificial grammar experiments to test recursive processing abilities, and previous work had shown that participants are able to learn such a grammar using linguistic stimuli (syllables). In the present work, we used two experimental paradigms (a yes/no task and a two-alternative forced choice) to test whether adult participants are able to learn a recursive Lindenmayer grammar composed of drum sounds. After a brief exposure phase, we found that participants at the group level were sensitive to the exposure grammar and capable of distinguishing the grammatical and ungrammatical test strings above chance level in both tasks. While we found evidence of participants’ sensitivity to a very complex L-system grammar in a non-linguistic, potentially musical domain, the results were not robust. We discuss the discrepancy within our results and with the previous literature using L-systems in the linguistic domain. Furthermore, we propose directions for future music cognition research using L-system grammars.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204320946615
work_keys_str_mv AT andreeageambasu rhythmicrecursionhumansensitivitytoalindenmayergrammarwithselfsimilarstructureinamusicaltask
AT lauratoron rhythmicrecursionhumansensitivitytoalindenmayergrammarwithselfsimilarstructureinamusicaltask
AT andrearavignani rhythmicrecursionhumansensitivitytoalindenmayergrammarwithselfsimilarstructureinamusicaltask
AT claraclevelt rhythmicrecursionhumansensitivitytoalindenmayergrammarwithselfsimilarstructureinamusicaltask
_version_ 1724553738584064000