Rhythmic Recursion? Human Sensitivity to a Lindenmayer Grammar with Self-similar Structure in a Musical Task
Processing of recursion has been proposed as the foundation of human linguistic ability. Yet this ability may be shared with other domains, such as the musical or rhythmic domain. Lindenmayer grammars (L-systems) have been proposed as a recursive grammar for use in artificial grammar experiments to...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Music & Science |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204320946615 |
id |
doaj-7f1bc429074a422faf68250b6c7aacc0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7f1bc429074a422faf68250b6c7aacc02020-11-25T03:35:33ZengSAGE PublishingMusic & Science2059-20432020-08-01310.1177/2059204320946615Rhythmic Recursion? Human Sensitivity to a Lindenmayer Grammar with Self-similar Structure in a Musical TaskAndreea Geambaşu0Laura Toron1Andrea Ravignani2Clara C. Levelt3 , Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands , Nijmegen, The Netherlands Comparative Bioacoustics Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands , Leiden University, Leiden, The NetherlandsProcessing of recursion has been proposed as the foundation of human linguistic ability. Yet this ability may be shared with other domains, such as the musical or rhythmic domain. Lindenmayer grammars (L-systems) have been proposed as a recursive grammar for use in artificial grammar experiments to test recursive processing abilities, and previous work had shown that participants are able to learn such a grammar using linguistic stimuli (syllables). In the present work, we used two experimental paradigms (a yes/no task and a two-alternative forced choice) to test whether adult participants are able to learn a recursive Lindenmayer grammar composed of drum sounds. After a brief exposure phase, we found that participants at the group level were sensitive to the exposure grammar and capable of distinguishing the grammatical and ungrammatical test strings above chance level in both tasks. While we found evidence of participants’ sensitivity to a very complex L-system grammar in a non-linguistic, potentially musical domain, the results were not robust. We discuss the discrepancy within our results and with the previous literature using L-systems in the linguistic domain. Furthermore, we propose directions for future music cognition research using L-system grammars.https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204320946615 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andreea Geambaşu Laura Toron Andrea Ravignani Clara C. Levelt |
spellingShingle |
Andreea Geambaşu Laura Toron Andrea Ravignani Clara C. Levelt Rhythmic Recursion? Human Sensitivity to a Lindenmayer Grammar with Self-similar Structure in a Musical Task Music & Science |
author_facet |
Andreea Geambaşu Laura Toron Andrea Ravignani Clara C. Levelt |
author_sort |
Andreea Geambaşu |
title |
Rhythmic Recursion? Human Sensitivity to a Lindenmayer Grammar with Self-similar Structure in a Musical Task |
title_short |
Rhythmic Recursion? Human Sensitivity to a Lindenmayer Grammar with Self-similar Structure in a Musical Task |
title_full |
Rhythmic Recursion? Human Sensitivity to a Lindenmayer Grammar with Self-similar Structure in a Musical Task |
title_fullStr |
Rhythmic Recursion? Human Sensitivity to a Lindenmayer Grammar with Self-similar Structure in a Musical Task |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rhythmic Recursion? Human Sensitivity to a Lindenmayer Grammar with Self-similar Structure in a Musical Task |
title_sort |
rhythmic recursion? human sensitivity to a lindenmayer grammar with self-similar structure in a musical task |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Music & Science |
issn |
2059-2043 |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
Processing of recursion has been proposed as the foundation of human linguistic ability. Yet this ability may be shared with other domains, such as the musical or rhythmic domain. Lindenmayer grammars (L-systems) have been proposed as a recursive grammar for use in artificial grammar experiments to test recursive processing abilities, and previous work had shown that participants are able to learn such a grammar using linguistic stimuli (syllables). In the present work, we used two experimental paradigms (a yes/no task and a two-alternative forced choice) to test whether adult participants are able to learn a recursive Lindenmayer grammar composed of drum sounds. After a brief exposure phase, we found that participants at the group level were sensitive to the exposure grammar and capable of distinguishing the grammatical and ungrammatical test strings above chance level in both tasks. While we found evidence of participants’ sensitivity to a very complex L-system grammar in a non-linguistic, potentially musical domain, the results were not robust. We discuss the discrepancy within our results and with the previous literature using L-systems in the linguistic domain. Furthermore, we propose directions for future music cognition research using L-system grammars. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204320946615 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andreeageambasu rhythmicrecursionhumansensitivitytoalindenmayergrammarwithselfsimilarstructureinamusicaltask AT lauratoron rhythmicrecursionhumansensitivitytoalindenmayergrammarwithselfsimilarstructureinamusicaltask AT andrearavignani rhythmicrecursionhumansensitivitytoalindenmayergrammarwithselfsimilarstructureinamusicaltask AT claraclevelt rhythmicrecursionhumansensitivitytoalindenmayergrammarwithselfsimilarstructureinamusicaltask |
_version_ |
1724553738584064000 |