Pragmatic Aspects of Metalinguistic Utterances
Verbal communication is an extremely many-faceted and complex phenomenon, and should be seen as a process which, besides sending and receiving messages about the object world, can also be focused on the use of the code through which the verbal interaction is taking place. Such spheres as teaching,...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Yerevan State University
2016-04-01
|
Series: | Armenian Folia Anglistika |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.ysu.am/index.php/arm-fol-angl/article/view/4471 |
id |
doaj-7f126ae6ef28435b9b7df246daeca787 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7f126ae6ef28435b9b7df246daeca7872021-09-24T09:13:05ZengYerevan State UniversityArmenian Folia Anglistika1829-24292579-30392016-04-01121 (15)10.46991/AFA/2016.12.1.007Pragmatic Aspects of Metalinguistic UtterancesMarika Tonyan0English Philology Department, Yerevan State University Verbal communication is an extremely many-faceted and complex phenomenon, and should be seen as a process which, besides sending and receiving messages about the object world, can also be focused on the use of the code through which the verbal interaction is taking place. Such spheres as teaching, translation, scientific discourse, court procedures, psychological treatment, to say nothing of verbal art, are obviously metalinguistically-oriented. However, in everyday interaction as well the discussion of metalinguistic issues by the interlocutors is almost as common as a talk about extralinguistic reality. The aim of the present study is to examine the interrelation of metalinguistic and pragmatic characteristics of utterances in everyday speech. We will try to show that only if a certain utterance of metalinguistic nature is perceived as such by the speaker and hearer, can communication be pragmatically successful. Conversely, provided that the interlocutors take into account certain pragmatic factors, the utterance can be actualized and realized as a metalinguistic one, the result being the interlocutors’ mutual understanding. https://journals.ysu.am/index.php/arm-fol-angl/article/view/4471“naive linguist”object languagereflexive use of languagemetalinguistic activitypragmatic feature |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marika Tonyan |
spellingShingle |
Marika Tonyan Pragmatic Aspects of Metalinguistic Utterances Armenian Folia Anglistika “naive linguist” object language reflexive use of language metalinguistic activity pragmatic feature |
author_facet |
Marika Tonyan |
author_sort |
Marika Tonyan |
title |
Pragmatic Aspects of Metalinguistic Utterances |
title_short |
Pragmatic Aspects of Metalinguistic Utterances |
title_full |
Pragmatic Aspects of Metalinguistic Utterances |
title_fullStr |
Pragmatic Aspects of Metalinguistic Utterances |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pragmatic Aspects of Metalinguistic Utterances |
title_sort |
pragmatic aspects of metalinguistic utterances |
publisher |
Yerevan State University |
series |
Armenian Folia Anglistika |
issn |
1829-2429 2579-3039 |
publishDate |
2016-04-01 |
description |
Verbal communication is an extremely many-faceted and complex phenomenon, and should be seen as a process which, besides sending and receiving messages about the object world, can also be focused on the use of the code through which the verbal interaction is taking place. Such spheres as teaching, translation, scientific discourse, court procedures, psychological treatment, to say nothing of verbal art, are obviously metalinguistically-oriented. However, in everyday interaction as well the discussion of metalinguistic issues by the interlocutors is almost as common as a talk about extralinguistic reality. The aim of the present study is to examine the interrelation of metalinguistic and pragmatic characteristics of utterances in everyday speech. We will try to show that only if a certain utterance of metalinguistic nature is perceived as such by the speaker and hearer, can communication be pragmatically successful. Conversely, provided that the interlocutors take into account certain pragmatic factors, the utterance can be actualized and realized as a metalinguistic one, the result being the interlocutors’ mutual understanding.
|
topic |
“naive linguist” object language reflexive use of language metalinguistic activity pragmatic feature |
url |
https://journals.ysu.am/index.php/arm-fol-angl/article/view/4471 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marikatonyan pragmaticaspectsofmetalinguisticutterances |
_version_ |
1717369940773699584 |