Immunological and Clinical Impact of Manipulated and Unmanipulated DLI after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation of AML Patients

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the preferred curative treatment for several hematological malignancies. The efficacy of allo-SCT depends on the graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect. However, the prognosis of patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following allo-SCT is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jochen Greiner, Marlies Götz, Donald Bunjes, Susanne Hofmann, Verena Wais
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-12-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/1/39
id doaj-7ee1cba8600a4ee5839232c11dd24076
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7ee1cba8600a4ee5839232c11dd240762020-11-25T01:51:48ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832019-12-01913910.3390/jcm9010039jcm9010039Immunological and Clinical Impact of Manipulated and Unmanipulated DLI after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation of AML PatientsJochen Greiner0Marlies Götz1Donald Bunjes2Susanne Hofmann3Verena Wais4Department of Internal Medicine, Diakonie Hospital Stuttgart, 70176 Stuttgart, GermanyDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, GermanyDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, GermanyDepartment of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, GermanyAllogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the preferred curative treatment for several hematological malignancies. The efficacy of allo-SCT depends on the graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect. However, the prognosis of patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following allo-SCT is poor. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is utilized after allo-SCT in this setting to prevent relapse, to prolong progression free survival, to establish full donor chimerism and to restore the GvL effect in patients with hematological malignancies. Thus, there are different options for the administration of DLI in AML patients. DLI is currently used prophylactically and in the setting of an overt relapse. In addition, in the minimal residual disease (MRD) setting, DLI may be a possibility to improve overall survival. However, DLI might increase the risk of severe life-threatening complications such as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) as well as severe infections. The transfusion of lymphocytes has been tested not only for the treatment of hematological malignancies but also chronic infections. In this context, manipulated DLI in a prophylactic or therapeutic approach are an option, e.g., virus-specific DLI using different selection methods or antigen-specific DLI such as peptide-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). In addition, T cells are also genetically engineered, using both chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) genetically modified T cells and T cell receptor (TCR) genetically modified T cells. T cell therapies in general have the potential to enhance antitumor immunity, augment vaccine efficacy, and limit graft-versus-host disease after allo-SCT. The focus of this review is to discuss the different strategies to use donor lymphocytes after allo-SCT. Our objective is to give an insight into the functional effects of DLI on immunogenic antigen recognition for a better understanding of the mechanisms of DLI. To ultimately increase the GvL potency without raising the risk of GvHD at the same time.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/1/39allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-sct)donor lymphocyte infusion (dli)graft-versus-leukemia (gvl) effectrelapsevirus-specific t cellsα/β t depletion
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jochen Greiner
Marlies Götz
Donald Bunjes
Susanne Hofmann
Verena Wais
spellingShingle Jochen Greiner
Marlies Götz
Donald Bunjes
Susanne Hofmann
Verena Wais
Immunological and Clinical Impact of Manipulated and Unmanipulated DLI after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation of AML Patients
Journal of Clinical Medicine
allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-sct)
donor lymphocyte infusion (dli)
graft-versus-leukemia (gvl) effect
relapse
virus-specific t cells
α/β t depletion
author_facet Jochen Greiner
Marlies Götz
Donald Bunjes
Susanne Hofmann
Verena Wais
author_sort Jochen Greiner
title Immunological and Clinical Impact of Manipulated and Unmanipulated DLI after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation of AML Patients
title_short Immunological and Clinical Impact of Manipulated and Unmanipulated DLI after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation of AML Patients
title_full Immunological and Clinical Impact of Manipulated and Unmanipulated DLI after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation of AML Patients
title_fullStr Immunological and Clinical Impact of Manipulated and Unmanipulated DLI after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation of AML Patients
title_full_unstemmed Immunological and Clinical Impact of Manipulated and Unmanipulated DLI after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation of AML Patients
title_sort immunological and clinical impact of manipulated and unmanipulated dli after allogeneic stem cell transplantation of aml patients
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
issn 2077-0383
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the preferred curative treatment for several hematological malignancies. The efficacy of allo-SCT depends on the graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect. However, the prognosis of patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following allo-SCT is poor. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is utilized after allo-SCT in this setting to prevent relapse, to prolong progression free survival, to establish full donor chimerism and to restore the GvL effect in patients with hematological malignancies. Thus, there are different options for the administration of DLI in AML patients. DLI is currently used prophylactically and in the setting of an overt relapse. In addition, in the minimal residual disease (MRD) setting, DLI may be a possibility to improve overall survival. However, DLI might increase the risk of severe life-threatening complications such as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) as well as severe infections. The transfusion of lymphocytes has been tested not only for the treatment of hematological malignancies but also chronic infections. In this context, manipulated DLI in a prophylactic or therapeutic approach are an option, e.g., virus-specific DLI using different selection methods or antigen-specific DLI such as peptide-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). In addition, T cells are also genetically engineered, using both chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) genetically modified T cells and T cell receptor (TCR) genetically modified T cells. T cell therapies in general have the potential to enhance antitumor immunity, augment vaccine efficacy, and limit graft-versus-host disease after allo-SCT. The focus of this review is to discuss the different strategies to use donor lymphocytes after allo-SCT. Our objective is to give an insight into the functional effects of DLI on immunogenic antigen recognition for a better understanding of the mechanisms of DLI. To ultimately increase the GvL potency without raising the risk of GvHD at the same time.
topic allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-sct)
donor lymphocyte infusion (dli)
graft-versus-leukemia (gvl) effect
relapse
virus-specific t cells
α/β t depletion
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/1/39
work_keys_str_mv AT jochengreiner immunologicalandclinicalimpactofmanipulatedandunmanipulateddliafterallogeneicstemcelltransplantationofamlpatients
AT marliesgotz immunologicalandclinicalimpactofmanipulatedandunmanipulateddliafterallogeneicstemcelltransplantationofamlpatients
AT donaldbunjes immunologicalandclinicalimpactofmanipulatedandunmanipulateddliafterallogeneicstemcelltransplantationofamlpatients
AT susannehofmann immunologicalandclinicalimpactofmanipulatedandunmanipulateddliafterallogeneicstemcelltransplantationofamlpatients
AT verenawais immunologicalandclinicalimpactofmanipulatedandunmanipulateddliafterallogeneicstemcelltransplantationofamlpatients
_version_ 1724996262470615040