Active vision in immersive, 360° real-world environments

Abstract How do we construct a sense of place in a real-world environment? Real-world environments are actively explored via saccades, head turns, and body movements. Yet, little is known about how humans process real-world scene information during active viewing conditions. Here, we exploited recen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amanda J. Haskins, Jeff Mentch, Thomas L. Botch, Caroline E. Robertson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2020-08-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71125-4
id doaj-7e9771655e1d422fb0474dad5de3c97e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7e9771655e1d422fb0474dad5de3c97e2021-09-05T11:26:31ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222020-08-0110111110.1038/s41598-020-71125-4Active vision in immersive, 360° real-world environmentsAmanda J. Haskins0Jeff Mentch1Thomas L. Botch2Caroline E. Robertson3Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth CollegeDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth CollegeDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth CollegeDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth CollegeAbstract How do we construct a sense of place in a real-world environment? Real-world environments are actively explored via saccades, head turns, and body movements. Yet, little is known about how humans process real-world scene information during active viewing conditions. Here, we exploited recent developments in virtual reality (VR) and in-headset eye-tracking to test the impact of active vs. passive viewing conditions on gaze behavior while participants explored novel, real-world, 360° scenes. In one condition, participants actively explored 360° photospheres from a first-person perspective via self-directed motion (saccades and head turns). In another condition, photospheres were passively displayed to participants while they were head-restricted. We found that, relative to passive viewers, active viewers displayed increased attention to semantically meaningful scene regions, suggesting more exploratory, information-seeking gaze behavior. We also observed signatures of exploratory behavior in eye movements, such as quicker, more entropic fixations during active as compared with passive viewing conditions. These results show that active viewing influences every aspect of gaze behavior, from the way we move our eyes to what we choose to attend to. Moreover, these results offer key benchmark measurements of gaze behavior in 360°, naturalistic environments.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71125-4
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amanda J. Haskins
Jeff Mentch
Thomas L. Botch
Caroline E. Robertson
spellingShingle Amanda J. Haskins
Jeff Mentch
Thomas L. Botch
Caroline E. Robertson
Active vision in immersive, 360° real-world environments
Scientific Reports
author_facet Amanda J. Haskins
Jeff Mentch
Thomas L. Botch
Caroline E. Robertson
author_sort Amanda J. Haskins
title Active vision in immersive, 360° real-world environments
title_short Active vision in immersive, 360° real-world environments
title_full Active vision in immersive, 360° real-world environments
title_fullStr Active vision in immersive, 360° real-world environments
title_full_unstemmed Active vision in immersive, 360° real-world environments
title_sort active vision in immersive, 360° real-world environments
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Abstract How do we construct a sense of place in a real-world environment? Real-world environments are actively explored via saccades, head turns, and body movements. Yet, little is known about how humans process real-world scene information during active viewing conditions. Here, we exploited recent developments in virtual reality (VR) and in-headset eye-tracking to test the impact of active vs. passive viewing conditions on gaze behavior while participants explored novel, real-world, 360° scenes. In one condition, participants actively explored 360° photospheres from a first-person perspective via self-directed motion (saccades and head turns). In another condition, photospheres were passively displayed to participants while they were head-restricted. We found that, relative to passive viewers, active viewers displayed increased attention to semantically meaningful scene regions, suggesting more exploratory, information-seeking gaze behavior. We also observed signatures of exploratory behavior in eye movements, such as quicker, more entropic fixations during active as compared with passive viewing conditions. These results show that active viewing influences every aspect of gaze behavior, from the way we move our eyes to what we choose to attend to. Moreover, these results offer key benchmark measurements of gaze behavior in 360°, naturalistic environments.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71125-4
work_keys_str_mv AT amandajhaskins activevisioninimmersive360realworldenvironments
AT jeffmentch activevisioninimmersive360realworldenvironments
AT thomaslbotch activevisioninimmersive360realworldenvironments
AT carolineerobertson activevisioninimmersive360realworldenvironments
_version_ 1717814256396664832