Piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose CT lung cancer screening

Abstract Background Recent evidence suggests that screening with low dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans significantly reduces mortality from lung cancer. However, optimal methods to identify potentially eligible patients in primary care are not known. Using brief electronic screening forms admini...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mary Ann O’Brien, Frank Sullivan, Andrea Carson, Rabiya Siddiqui, Saddaf Syed, Lawrence Paszat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-11-01
Series:BMC Family Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12875-017-0666-5
id doaj-7e92252340a5414eacab918289683b7a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7e92252340a5414eacab918289683b7a2020-11-25T01:38:39ZengBMCBMC Family Practice1471-22962017-11-011811910.1186/s12875-017-0666-5Piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose CT lung cancer screeningMary Ann O’Brien0Frank Sullivan1Andrea Carson2Rabiya Siddiqui3Saddaf Syed4Lawrence Paszat5Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of TorontoDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of TorontoDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of TorontoDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of TorontoDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of TorontoSunnybrook Research InstituteAbstract Background Recent evidence suggests that screening with low dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans significantly reduces mortality from lung cancer. However, optimal methods to identify potentially eligible patients in primary care are not known. Using brief electronic screening forms administered prior to a primary care visit is a strategy to identify high risk, asymptomatic patients eligible for LDCT screening. The objective of this study was to compare the acceptability and feasibility of using brief electronic versus paper screening forms to identify eligible patients at high risk of developing lung cancer in primary care. Methods A mixed method pilot comparative study was conducted in primary care. Practices were allocated to an electronic form (e-form) group or a paper-based form (p-form) group. Allocation was randomly assigned for the first practice then by alternation. Patients in the e-form practices completed forms at home via the web or in the waiting room on a tablet. Patients in p-form practices completed forms in waiting rooms. Interviews were conducted with patients, administrators, and primary care physicians (PCPs) about their experiences. Results Six of 30 (20%) eligible practices agreed to participate. Over the 16-week study period, a total of 831 of an expected 1442 patients (58%) aged 55–74 years were enrolled; 573/690 (83%) patients in the e-form group and 258/752 (34%) in the p-form group. Of the 573 participants in the e-form group, 335 (58%) completed forms via the web; 238 (29%) did so via tablet. Twenty-four interviews were conducted with 15 patients, 5 administrative staff and 4 PCPs. Patients were willing to discuss lung cancer screening eligibility with their PCP. Staff members expressed low administrative burden except for an extra step to link appointment information to patient demographics to identify eligible patients. PCPs indicated that forms were reminders to discuss smoking cessation. PCPs in the e-form group reported that patients asked questions about screening. Conclusion There was fairly low uptake by primary care practices. For e-forms to be feasible in practice workflow, electronic medical record software needs to link appointment information with patient eligibility requirements. The use of brief pre-consultation electronic screening forms for LDCT eligibility encouraged PCPs to discuss smoking cessation with patients.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12875-017-0666-5Lung cancer screeningPrimary careHealth services researchLow dose computed tomography (LDCT)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mary Ann O’Brien
Frank Sullivan
Andrea Carson
Rabiya Siddiqui
Saddaf Syed
Lawrence Paszat
spellingShingle Mary Ann O’Brien
Frank Sullivan
Andrea Carson
Rabiya Siddiqui
Saddaf Syed
Lawrence Paszat
Piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose CT lung cancer screening
BMC Family Practice
Lung cancer screening
Primary care
Health services research
Low dose computed tomography (LDCT)
author_facet Mary Ann O’Brien
Frank Sullivan
Andrea Carson
Rabiya Siddiqui
Saddaf Syed
Lawrence Paszat
author_sort Mary Ann O’Brien
title Piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose CT lung cancer screening
title_short Piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose CT lung cancer screening
title_full Piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose CT lung cancer screening
title_fullStr Piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose CT lung cancer screening
title_full_unstemmed Piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose CT lung cancer screening
title_sort piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose ct lung cancer screening
publisher BMC
series BMC Family Practice
issn 1471-2296
publishDate 2017-11-01
description Abstract Background Recent evidence suggests that screening with low dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans significantly reduces mortality from lung cancer. However, optimal methods to identify potentially eligible patients in primary care are not known. Using brief electronic screening forms administered prior to a primary care visit is a strategy to identify high risk, asymptomatic patients eligible for LDCT screening. The objective of this study was to compare the acceptability and feasibility of using brief electronic versus paper screening forms to identify eligible patients at high risk of developing lung cancer in primary care. Methods A mixed method pilot comparative study was conducted in primary care. Practices were allocated to an electronic form (e-form) group or a paper-based form (p-form) group. Allocation was randomly assigned for the first practice then by alternation. Patients in the e-form practices completed forms at home via the web or in the waiting room on a tablet. Patients in p-form practices completed forms in waiting rooms. Interviews were conducted with patients, administrators, and primary care physicians (PCPs) about their experiences. Results Six of 30 (20%) eligible practices agreed to participate. Over the 16-week study period, a total of 831 of an expected 1442 patients (58%) aged 55–74 years were enrolled; 573/690 (83%) patients in the e-form group and 258/752 (34%) in the p-form group. Of the 573 participants in the e-form group, 335 (58%) completed forms via the web; 238 (29%) did so via tablet. Twenty-four interviews were conducted with 15 patients, 5 administrative staff and 4 PCPs. Patients were willing to discuss lung cancer screening eligibility with their PCP. Staff members expressed low administrative burden except for an extra step to link appointment information to patient demographics to identify eligible patients. PCPs indicated that forms were reminders to discuss smoking cessation. PCPs in the e-form group reported that patients asked questions about screening. Conclusion There was fairly low uptake by primary care practices. For e-forms to be feasible in practice workflow, electronic medical record software needs to link appointment information with patient eligibility requirements. The use of brief pre-consultation electronic screening forms for LDCT eligibility encouraged PCPs to discuss smoking cessation with patients.
topic Lung cancer screening
Primary care
Health services research
Low dose computed tomography (LDCT)
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12875-017-0666-5
work_keys_str_mv AT maryannobrien pilotingelectronicscreeningformsinprimarycarefindingsfromamixedmethodsstudytoidentifypatientseligibleforlowdosectlungcancerscreening
AT franksullivan pilotingelectronicscreeningformsinprimarycarefindingsfromamixedmethodsstudytoidentifypatientseligibleforlowdosectlungcancerscreening
AT andreacarson pilotingelectronicscreeningformsinprimarycarefindingsfromamixedmethodsstudytoidentifypatientseligibleforlowdosectlungcancerscreening
AT rabiyasiddiqui pilotingelectronicscreeningformsinprimarycarefindingsfromamixedmethodsstudytoidentifypatientseligibleforlowdosectlungcancerscreening
AT saddafsyed pilotingelectronicscreeningformsinprimarycarefindingsfromamixedmethodsstudytoidentifypatientseligibleforlowdosectlungcancerscreening
AT lawrencepaszat pilotingelectronicscreeningformsinprimarycarefindingsfromamixedmethodsstudytoidentifypatientseligibleforlowdosectlungcancerscreening
_version_ 1725052398894841856