Piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose CT lung cancer screening
Abstract Background Recent evidence suggests that screening with low dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans significantly reduces mortality from lung cancer. However, optimal methods to identify potentially eligible patients in primary care are not known. Using brief electronic screening forms admini...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-11-01
|
Series: | BMC Family Practice |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12875-017-0666-5 |
id |
doaj-7e92252340a5414eacab918289683b7a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7e92252340a5414eacab918289683b7a2020-11-25T01:38:39ZengBMCBMC Family Practice1471-22962017-11-011811910.1186/s12875-017-0666-5Piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose CT lung cancer screeningMary Ann O’Brien0Frank Sullivan1Andrea Carson2Rabiya Siddiqui3Saddaf Syed4Lawrence Paszat5Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of TorontoDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of TorontoDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of TorontoDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of TorontoDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of TorontoSunnybrook Research InstituteAbstract Background Recent evidence suggests that screening with low dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans significantly reduces mortality from lung cancer. However, optimal methods to identify potentially eligible patients in primary care are not known. Using brief electronic screening forms administered prior to a primary care visit is a strategy to identify high risk, asymptomatic patients eligible for LDCT screening. The objective of this study was to compare the acceptability and feasibility of using brief electronic versus paper screening forms to identify eligible patients at high risk of developing lung cancer in primary care. Methods A mixed method pilot comparative study was conducted in primary care. Practices were allocated to an electronic form (e-form) group or a paper-based form (p-form) group. Allocation was randomly assigned for the first practice then by alternation. Patients in the e-form practices completed forms at home via the web or in the waiting room on a tablet. Patients in p-form practices completed forms in waiting rooms. Interviews were conducted with patients, administrators, and primary care physicians (PCPs) about their experiences. Results Six of 30 (20%) eligible practices agreed to participate. Over the 16-week study period, a total of 831 of an expected 1442 patients (58%) aged 55–74 years were enrolled; 573/690 (83%) patients in the e-form group and 258/752 (34%) in the p-form group. Of the 573 participants in the e-form group, 335 (58%) completed forms via the web; 238 (29%) did so via tablet. Twenty-four interviews were conducted with 15 patients, 5 administrative staff and 4 PCPs. Patients were willing to discuss lung cancer screening eligibility with their PCP. Staff members expressed low administrative burden except for an extra step to link appointment information to patient demographics to identify eligible patients. PCPs indicated that forms were reminders to discuss smoking cessation. PCPs in the e-form group reported that patients asked questions about screening. Conclusion There was fairly low uptake by primary care practices. For e-forms to be feasible in practice workflow, electronic medical record software needs to link appointment information with patient eligibility requirements. The use of brief pre-consultation electronic screening forms for LDCT eligibility encouraged PCPs to discuss smoking cessation with patients.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12875-017-0666-5Lung cancer screeningPrimary careHealth services researchLow dose computed tomography (LDCT) |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mary Ann O’Brien Frank Sullivan Andrea Carson Rabiya Siddiqui Saddaf Syed Lawrence Paszat |
spellingShingle |
Mary Ann O’Brien Frank Sullivan Andrea Carson Rabiya Siddiqui Saddaf Syed Lawrence Paszat Piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose CT lung cancer screening BMC Family Practice Lung cancer screening Primary care Health services research Low dose computed tomography (LDCT) |
author_facet |
Mary Ann O’Brien Frank Sullivan Andrea Carson Rabiya Siddiqui Saddaf Syed Lawrence Paszat |
author_sort |
Mary Ann O’Brien |
title |
Piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose CT lung cancer screening |
title_short |
Piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose CT lung cancer screening |
title_full |
Piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose CT lung cancer screening |
title_fullStr |
Piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose CT lung cancer screening |
title_full_unstemmed |
Piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose CT lung cancer screening |
title_sort |
piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose ct lung cancer screening |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Family Practice |
issn |
1471-2296 |
publishDate |
2017-11-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Recent evidence suggests that screening with low dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans significantly reduces mortality from lung cancer. However, optimal methods to identify potentially eligible patients in primary care are not known. Using brief electronic screening forms administered prior to a primary care visit is a strategy to identify high risk, asymptomatic patients eligible for LDCT screening. The objective of this study was to compare the acceptability and feasibility of using brief electronic versus paper screening forms to identify eligible patients at high risk of developing lung cancer in primary care. Methods A mixed method pilot comparative study was conducted in primary care. Practices were allocated to an electronic form (e-form) group or a paper-based form (p-form) group. Allocation was randomly assigned for the first practice then by alternation. Patients in the e-form practices completed forms at home via the web or in the waiting room on a tablet. Patients in p-form practices completed forms in waiting rooms. Interviews were conducted with patients, administrators, and primary care physicians (PCPs) about their experiences. Results Six of 30 (20%) eligible practices agreed to participate. Over the 16-week study period, a total of 831 of an expected 1442 patients (58%) aged 55–74 years were enrolled; 573/690 (83%) patients in the e-form group and 258/752 (34%) in the p-form group. Of the 573 participants in the e-form group, 335 (58%) completed forms via the web; 238 (29%) did so via tablet. Twenty-four interviews were conducted with 15 patients, 5 administrative staff and 4 PCPs. Patients were willing to discuss lung cancer screening eligibility with their PCP. Staff members expressed low administrative burden except for an extra step to link appointment information to patient demographics to identify eligible patients. PCPs indicated that forms were reminders to discuss smoking cessation. PCPs in the e-form group reported that patients asked questions about screening. Conclusion There was fairly low uptake by primary care practices. For e-forms to be feasible in practice workflow, electronic medical record software needs to link appointment information with patient eligibility requirements. The use of brief pre-consultation electronic screening forms for LDCT eligibility encouraged PCPs to discuss smoking cessation with patients. |
topic |
Lung cancer screening Primary care Health services research Low dose computed tomography (LDCT) |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12875-017-0666-5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT maryannobrien pilotingelectronicscreeningformsinprimarycarefindingsfromamixedmethodsstudytoidentifypatientseligibleforlowdosectlungcancerscreening AT franksullivan pilotingelectronicscreeningformsinprimarycarefindingsfromamixedmethodsstudytoidentifypatientseligibleforlowdosectlungcancerscreening AT andreacarson pilotingelectronicscreeningformsinprimarycarefindingsfromamixedmethodsstudytoidentifypatientseligibleforlowdosectlungcancerscreening AT rabiyasiddiqui pilotingelectronicscreeningformsinprimarycarefindingsfromamixedmethodsstudytoidentifypatientseligibleforlowdosectlungcancerscreening AT saddafsyed pilotingelectronicscreeningformsinprimarycarefindingsfromamixedmethodsstudytoidentifypatientseligibleforlowdosectlungcancerscreening AT lawrencepaszat pilotingelectronicscreeningformsinprimarycarefindingsfromamixedmethodsstudytoidentifypatientseligibleforlowdosectlungcancerscreening |
_version_ |
1725052398894841856 |