Peculiarities of legal language in civil law contracts concluded via the Internet

Informatization of the society leads to the fact that more and more often civil contracts are concluded between contractors who are far away from each other and they communicate only via the Internet. Peculiarities of legal language in contracts are studied. Moreover, contracts concluded by acceptin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marina Kozlova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:SHS Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2019/10/shsconf_cildiah2019_00067.pdf
id doaj-7e7137ff1cc34168bfaf6c279fd80815
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7e7137ff1cc34168bfaf6c279fd808152021-04-02T11:36:27ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242019-01-01690006710.1051/shsconf/20196900067shsconf_cildiah2019_00067Peculiarities of legal language in civil law contracts concluded via the InternetMarina KozlovaInformatization of the society leads to the fact that more and more often civil contracts are concluded between contractors who are far away from each other and they communicate only via the Internet. Peculiarities of legal language in contracts are studied. Moreover, contracts concluded by accepting public offers, exchanging messages, contracts concluded while purchasing goods and services in internet shops and using internet applications are studied. It is determined that the contracts concluded via the Internet do not have a unified text, signed by the sides, they contain links to other documents and sources, contain linguistic structures, excluding the possibility to agree on the contract’s terms. The contractor offering to conclude the contract usually includes terms profitable for him - on restraining responsibility, on applicable law, on jurisdiction of disputes. Such contracts always imply that the joining side will learn the agreement’s terms, though in most cases it does not happen, and the joining side can be deceived about the agreement’s content and the contractor’s identity.https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2019/10/shsconf_cildiah2019_00067.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marina Kozlova
spellingShingle Marina Kozlova
Peculiarities of legal language in civil law contracts concluded via the Internet
SHS Web of Conferences
author_facet Marina Kozlova
author_sort Marina Kozlova
title Peculiarities of legal language in civil law contracts concluded via the Internet
title_short Peculiarities of legal language in civil law contracts concluded via the Internet
title_full Peculiarities of legal language in civil law contracts concluded via the Internet
title_fullStr Peculiarities of legal language in civil law contracts concluded via the Internet
title_full_unstemmed Peculiarities of legal language in civil law contracts concluded via the Internet
title_sort peculiarities of legal language in civil law contracts concluded via the internet
publisher EDP Sciences
series SHS Web of Conferences
issn 2261-2424
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Informatization of the society leads to the fact that more and more often civil contracts are concluded between contractors who are far away from each other and they communicate only via the Internet. Peculiarities of legal language in contracts are studied. Moreover, contracts concluded by accepting public offers, exchanging messages, contracts concluded while purchasing goods and services in internet shops and using internet applications are studied. It is determined that the contracts concluded via the Internet do not have a unified text, signed by the sides, they contain links to other documents and sources, contain linguistic structures, excluding the possibility to agree on the contract’s terms. The contractor offering to conclude the contract usually includes terms profitable for him - on restraining responsibility, on applicable law, on jurisdiction of disputes. Such contracts always imply that the joining side will learn the agreement’s terms, though in most cases it does not happen, and the joining side can be deceived about the agreement’s content and the contractor’s identity.
url https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2019/10/shsconf_cildiah2019_00067.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT marinakozlova peculiaritiesoflegallanguageincivillawcontractsconcludedviatheinternet
_version_ 1724164266226876416